Hojabri H, Glennon J D
J Chromatogr. 1985 Jul 12;342(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)84492-8.
New high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) and gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) methods for the measurement of the antidepressant cianopramine in human plasma are compared for precision, accuracy, selectivity, sensitivity and convenience. Important differences were found with regard to precision, selectivity and sensitivity when ultraviolet, fluorescence and electron-capture detection were used. The mean coefficients of variation for intra-assay variability of cianopramine were 1.0% (HPLC-UV), 1.5% (HPLC-fluorescence) and 5.3% (GLC) over the concentration range studied. The results obtained support the selection of HPLC as the method of choice for the analysis of cianopramine in plasma, based mainly on its merits of sensitivity and convenience, despite the enhanced selectivity of the GLC method.
比较了用于测定人血浆中抗抑郁药氰丙咪嗪的新型高效液相色谱(HPLC)法和气液色谱(GLC)法在精密度、准确度、选择性、灵敏度和便利性方面的差异。当使用紫外、荧光和电子捕获检测时,在精密度、选择性和灵敏度方面发现了重要差异。在所研究的浓度范围内,氰丙咪嗪批内变异的平均变异系数分别为:高效液相色谱 - 紫外检测法为1.0%,高效液相色谱 - 荧光检测法为1.5%,气液色谱法为5.3%。尽管气液色谱法具有更高的选择性,但基于其灵敏度和便利性的优点,所得结果支持选择高效液相色谱法作为血浆中氰丙咪嗪分析的首选方法。