Suppr超能文献

过敏与免疫学领域项目计划和中心申请同行评审的定量评估

Quantitative evaluation of peer review of program project and center applications in allergy and immunology.

作者信息

Das N K, Froehlich L A

出版信息

J Clin Immunol. 1985 Jul;5(4):220-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00929456.

Abstract

We compared the review patterns of applications for program projects and centers in allergy and immunology, reviewed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases review committee, with those of individual research projects in immunology, reviewed by three Division of Research Grants study sections. A high concordance between these review groups was obtained with respect to the application approval rate, mean score, and distribution of applications in various priority score ranges. Furthermore, we observed a high degree of consensus among reviewers on the quality of many program project and center applications, especially those with priority scores between 100 and 200.

摘要

我们将美国国立过敏与传染病研究所评审委员会评审的过敏与免疫学领域项目计划和中心的申请评审模式,与由研究资助司的三个研究小组评审的免疫学领域单个研究项目的评审模式进行了比较。在申请批准率、平均得分以及不同优先得分范围内申请的分布方面,这些评审小组之间具有高度的一致性。此外,我们观察到评审人员对许多项目计划和中心申请的质量,尤其是那些优先得分在100至200之间的申请,达成了高度共识。

相似文献

5
Rating intervals: an experiment in peer review.评级间隔:同行评审实验
FASEB J. 1989 Jun;3(8):1987-92. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.3.8.2721858.
6
Careers in immunology: the new reality.免疫学领域的职业:新现实
Nat Immunol. 2001 Jan;2(1):5-8. doi: 10.1038/83165.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验