Suppr超能文献

过敏与免疫学领域项目计划和中心申请同行评审的定量评估

Quantitative evaluation of peer review of program project and center applications in allergy and immunology.

作者信息

Das N K, Froehlich L A

出版信息

J Clin Immunol. 1985 Jul;5(4):220-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00929456.

Abstract

We compared the review patterns of applications for program projects and centers in allergy and immunology, reviewed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases review committee, with those of individual research projects in immunology, reviewed by three Division of Research Grants study sections. A high concordance between these review groups was obtained with respect to the application approval rate, mean score, and distribution of applications in various priority score ranges. Furthermore, we observed a high degree of consensus among reviewers on the quality of many program project and center applications, especially those with priority scores between 100 and 200.

摘要

我们将美国国立过敏与传染病研究所评审委员会评审的过敏与免疫学领域项目计划和中心的申请评审模式,与由研究资助司的三个研究小组评审的免疫学领域单个研究项目的评审模式进行了比较。在申请批准率、平均得分以及不同优先得分范围内申请的分布方面,这些评审小组之间具有高度的一致性。此外,我们观察到评审人员对许多项目计划和中心申请的质量,尤其是那些优先得分在100至200之间的申请,达成了高度共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验