Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
作者信息
Henley C
出版信息
Fed Proc. 1977 Aug;36(9):2186-90.
PMID:885260
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
3
Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
Fed Proc. 1977 Sep;36(10):2335-8.
4
Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.关于改进美国国立卫生研究院同行评审系统的提案。
Clin Res. 1977 Dec;25(5):295-6.
5
Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team.
Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y). 1976 Summer;4(2):201-3.
6
Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?美国国立卫生研究院的同行评审需要修改吗？
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Feb;16(2):238.
7
Remembering the peer in peer review.
Nurs Res. 1987 Nov-Dec;36(6):379-80.
8
Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
Cancer Res. 1973 Apr;33(4):919.
9
Moron peer review.白痴同行评审。
Curr Biol. 1999 Oct 21;9(20):R755. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80001-9.
10
Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.社论：同行评审系统与美国国立卫生研究院
Surg Neurol. 1976 May;5(5):319-20.
引用本文的文献
1
NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact.美国国立卫生研究院同行评审：评分评审标准及总体影响。
Am J Eval. 2016 Jun;37(2):238-249. doi: 10.1177/1098214015582049. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Quantitative evaluation of peer review of program project and center applications in allergy and immunology.过敏与免疫学领域项目计划和中心申请同行评审的定量评估
J Clin Immunol. 1985 Jul;5(4):220-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00929456.
Zotero 插件