Bergenfeld Irina, Clark Cari Jo, Bengtson Angela M, Haardörfer Regine
Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Assessment. 2025 May 30:10731911251340847. doi: 10.1177/10731911251340847.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pressing international issue affecting more than a third of women in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, accurate global assessment of IPV prevalence among women in LMICs is limited by a lack of consensus around the domains of IPV and sparse evidence on cross-country comparability. We assessed the measurement structure and regional invariance of scales used in population-based surveys to measure IPV (physical, sexual, and emotional) and controlling behaviors. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we tested unidimensional, multifactorial, hierarchical, bifactor, and bifactor S-1 models for lifetime and past-year IPV across 46 LMICs. We then assessed the invariance of the best-fitting models across countries within world regions using multiple-group CFA. Although other models also showed good fit in most countries, bifactor/bifactor S-1 models had the best fit across all countries and were invariant within most regions. Most bifactor models, especially without controlling behaviors, were primarily unidimensional; IPV can therefore be conceptualized as a single construct with nuanced facets. Researchers seeking to model IPV should consider the bifactor/bifactor S-1 model, unidimensional model, or simple summative measures incorporating physical, sexual, and emotional domains.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个紧迫的国际问题,影响着低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)超过三分之一的女性。然而,由于围绕IPV领域缺乏共识以及跨国可比性的证据稀少,对LMICs中女性IPV患病率的准确全球评估受到限制。我们评估了在基于人群的调查中用于测量IPV(身体、性和情感方面)及控制行为的量表的测量结构和区域不变性。使用验证性因素分析(CFA),我们针对46个LMICs中一生中和过去一年的IPV测试了单维、多因素、层次、双因素和双因素S-1模型。然后,我们使用多组CFA评估了世界各区域内各国最佳拟合模型的不变性。尽管其他模型在大多数国家也显示出良好的拟合,但双因素/双因素S-1模型在所有国家中拟合最佳,并且在大多数区域内具有不变性。大多数双因素模型,尤其是不包括控制行为的模型,主要是单维的;因此,IPV可以被概念化为一个具有细微差别的单一结构。寻求对IPV进行建模的研究人员应考虑双因素/双因素S-1模型、单维模型或纳入身体、性和情感领域的简单汇总测量方法。