• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转诊网络增加了医生对局限性前列腺癌采用主动监测的比例:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库-医疗保险数据的横断面研究

Referral Network Increases Physicians' Adoption of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Using SEER-Medicare.

作者信息

Liu Yu, Howard David, Shih Ya-Chen Tina

机构信息

Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251342466. doi: 10.1177/00469580251342466. Epub 2025 May 31.

DOI:10.1177/00469580251342466
PMID:40448564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12126674/
Abstract

Physicians' referral networks influence the information they obtain from peers and how fast they adopt new treatment modality. This study employs a cross-sectional design. We examined how urologists' referral network connections via primary care physicians influence the adoption of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer, using SEER-Medicare data (2001-2015). We developed a referral network index to measure urologists' connections outside their practice. Multinomial logistic regression estimated the likelihood of active surveillance adoption, adjusting for patient, urologist, and market factors. Findings revealed that each standard deviation increase in a urologist's referral network index was associated with a 1.90 percentage point rise in the likelihood of adopting active surveillance, with a more pronounced effect observed post-2010. The study concludes that primary care physicians may function as critical "information hubs," accelerating the diffusion of new treatment modalities among urologists, particularly following clinical guideline updates.

摘要

医生的转诊网络会影响他们从同行那里获取的信息,以及他们采用新治疗方式的速度。本研究采用横断面设计。我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保数据(2001 - 2015年),研究了泌尿科医生通过初级保健医生建立的转诊网络联系如何影响对局限性前列腺癌采用主动监测的情况。我们开发了一个转诊网络指数来衡量泌尿科医生在其执业范围之外的联系。多项逻辑回归估计了采用主动监测的可能性,并对患者、泌尿科医生和市场因素进行了调整。研究结果显示,泌尿科医生的转诊网络指数每增加一个标准差,采用主动监测的可能性就会提高1.90个百分点,2010年之后这种影响更为明显。该研究得出结论,初级保健医生可能起到关键的“信息枢纽”作用,加速新治疗方式在泌尿科医生中的传播,尤其是在临床指南更新之后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/5379d2685a25/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/393467c898f1/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/a08cad383a82/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/5379d2685a25/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/393467c898f1/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/a08cad383a82/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e019/12126674/5379d2685a25/10.1177_00469580251342466-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Referral Network Increases Physicians' Adoption of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Using SEER-Medicare.转诊网络增加了医生对局限性前列腺癌采用主动监测的比例:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库-医疗保险数据的横断面研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251342466. doi: 10.1177/00469580251342466. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Urologist-Level Correlation in the Use of Observation for Low- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.泌尿科医生在低危和高危前列腺癌观察中的应用的相关性。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jan 1;152(1):27-34. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2907.
3
Variation in use of active surveillance among men undergoing expectant treatment for early stage prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌接受期待治疗的男性中主动监测使用的变化。
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.105. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
4
Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌治疗前的医生问诊。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):440-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.1.
5
Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists.低风险前列腺癌采用主动监测的认知障碍:社区和学术泌尿外科医生的定性分析
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 31;21(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08386-3.
6
Regional Variation in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the US.美国低危前列腺癌主动监测的区域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031349. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31349.
7
Referral and treatment patterns among patients with stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.III 期和 IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者的转诊和治疗模式。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jan;9(1):42-50. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000640.
8
Population-Based Assessment of Determining Treatments for Prostate Cancer.基于人群的前列腺癌治疗方法评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):60-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.192.
9
Patient preferences and urologist recommendations among local-stage prostate cancer patients who present for initial consultation and second opinions.局部前列腺癌患者在初次就诊和寻求第二诊疗意见时的患者偏好和泌尿科医生建议。
World J Urol. 2011 Feb;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0602-y. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
The Development and Validation of Prostate Cancer-specific Physician-Hospital Networks.前列腺癌特异性医师-医院网络的开发与验证。
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.049. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the use of active surveillance and treatments in Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.医疗保险受益人群中局限性前列腺癌患者中主动监测和治疗应用的趋势。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):432.e1-432.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局部前列腺癌主动监测、手术、近距离放疗或外照射放疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺治疗 5 年的患者报告结局。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675.
3
Will Increasing Primary Care Spending Alone Save Money?
仅增加初级保健支出就能省钱吗?
JAMA. 2019 Oct 8;322(14):1349-1350. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12016.
4
Comparing Shared Patient Networks Across Payers.比较不同支付方的共享患者网络。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2014-2020. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04978-9. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs.同伴网络对医生采用新药的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):e0204826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204826. eCollection 2018.
6
National Trends in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Validation of Medicare Claims-based Algorithms.前列腺癌主动监测的全国趋势:基于医疗保险理赔算法的验证
Urology. 2018 Oct;120:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
7
Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放疗或主动监测的选择与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1652.
8
Urologist-Level Correlation in the Use of Observation for Low- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.泌尿科医生在低危和高危前列腺癌观察中的应用的相关性。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jan 1;152(1):27-34. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2907.
9
Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.关于理解低价值临床实践的弃用:一项范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 6;13:255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0488-z.
10
Social networks of professionals in health care organizations: a review.医疗保健组织中专业人员的社交网络:一项综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Dec;71(6):619-60. doi: 10.1177/1077558714557079. Epub 2014 Nov 6.