• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放疗或主动监测的选择与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1652.
2
Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years.局限性前列腺癌的放射治疗、手术或观察与3年后患者报告结局之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-1140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1704.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局部前列腺癌主动监测、手术、近距离放疗或外照射放疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺治疗 5 年的患者报告结局。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675.
4
Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment.局限性前列腺癌治疗后的功能结局。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 23;331(4):302-317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491.
5
Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiotherapy Compared with Active Surveillance Among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.比较局部前列腺癌男性患者接受立体定向体部放射治疗和常规分割外照射放射治疗与主动监测后的患者报告生活质量。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.026. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
6
Quality of life impact of treatments for localized prostate cancer: cohort study with a 5 year follow-up.局限性前列腺癌治疗对生活质量的影响:一项为期5年随访的队列研究
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
7
Patient-reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: Analysis of a population-based prospective cohort.患者报告的不同类型根治性前列腺切除术和放疗后的性生活质量:基于人群的前瞻性队列分析。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3657-3665. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32288. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
8
Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiotherapy With Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost vs Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Five-year Results From a Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Study.局部前列腺癌外照射放疗联合低剂量率近距离放疗与根治性前列腺切除术的患者报告结局:一项前瞻性比较有效性研究的 5 年结果。
J Urol. 2022 Dec;208(6):1226-1239. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002902. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
Prospective assessment of voiding and sexual function after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma: comparison of radical prostatectomy to hormonobrachytherapy with and without external beam radiotherapy.局限性前列腺癌治疗后排尿和性功能的前瞻性评估:根治性前列腺切除术与有或无体外放疗的激素近距离放疗的比较。
Cancer. 2001 Jun 1;91(11):2046-55. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<2046::aid-cncr1231>3.0.co;2-w.
10
Health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy, prostate brachytherapy and reference population: a cross-sectional study.接受主动监测与根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、前列腺近距离放疗以及参照人群的前列腺癌男性患者的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1082-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-prostatectomy rehospitalisation rates and risk factors in South Australian men with prostate cancer: evidence from linked data.南澳大利亚州前列腺癌男性患者前列腺切除术后再入院率及危险因素:来自关联数据的证据
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04691-z.
2
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
3
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting Gleason score upgrade in prostate cancer.用于预测前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-178. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
4
Postoperative functional complications and quality of life following robot-assisted prostatectomy and radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.局限性前列腺癌患者接受机器人辅助前列腺切除术和放射治疗后的术后功能并发症及生活质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析的证据
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 22;19(1):314. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02496-x.
5
Patient Reported Outcomes and Treatment-Associated Complications as a Consideration in Selecting Localized Prostate Cancer Management.患者报告的结局和治疗相关并发症作为选择局限性前列腺癌治疗方案时的考虑因素。
Res Rep Urol. 2025 Jun 12;17:195-210. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S386383. eCollection 2025.
6
Referral Network Increases Physicians' Adoption of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Using SEER-Medicare.转诊网络增加了医生对局限性前列腺癌采用主动监测的比例:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库-医疗保险数据的横断面研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251342466. doi: 10.1177/00469580251342466. Epub 2025 May 31.
7
Biochemical Recurrence in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and External Radiotherapy.高危局限性前列腺癌的生化复发:腹腔镜前列腺切除术与体外放疗的比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 20;61(5):928. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050928.
8
Fatigue Level Associated with Quality of Life for Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from the All of Us Research Program.前列腺癌患者的疲劳程度与生活质量的关系:来自“我们所有人”研究项目的结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1531. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091531.
9
External validation of inter-reader reliability of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system following focal cryoablation and focal high-intensity focused ultrasound.聚焦冷冻消融和聚焦高强度聚焦超声后前列腺局灶消融成像(PI-FAB)评分系统阅片者间可靠性的外部验证
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11513-4.
10
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Decision Regret After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radiotherapy or Focal Therapy.放疗或聚焦治疗后复发性前列腺癌挽救性根治性前列腺切除术后的患者报告结局指标与决策后悔
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 25;17(3):396. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030396.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of prostate brachytherapy for low risk prostate cancer: Is the decline overstated?低危前列腺癌前列腺近距离放射治疗的应用:其使用量的下降是否被夸大了?
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016 Aug;8(4):289-93. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61942. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗后的患者报告结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
Relief of Urinary Symptom Burden after Primary Prostate Cancer Treatment.原发性前列腺癌治疗后尿路症状负担的缓解。
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.101. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
4
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.癌症治疗和生存统计,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
6
The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.微创前列腺切除术对美国泌尿外科医生执业模式的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
7
Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement.主动监测在局限性前列腺癌管理中的应用(安大略癌症护理指南):美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2182-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Design of the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study (NC ProCESS).北卡罗来纳州前列腺癌比较疗效与生存研究(NC ProCESS)的设计
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Jan;4(1):3-9. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.67.
10
Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer.定义一组以患者为中心的局部前列腺癌男性患者结局的标准。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放疗或主动监测的选择与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。

Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Chen Ronald C, Basak Ramsankar, Meyer Anne-Marie, Kuo Tzy-Mey, Carpenter William R, Agans Robert P, Broughman James R, Reeve Bryce B, Nielsen Matthew E, Usinger Deborah S, Spearman Kiayni C, Walden Sarah, Kaleel Dianne, Anderson Mary, Stürmer Til, Godley Paul A

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill2Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill3Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1652.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.1652
PMID:28324092
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6284802/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have to decide among treatment strategies that may differ in their likelihood of adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life (QOL) after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy vs active surveillance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based prospective cohort of 1141 men (57% participation among eligible men) with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were enrolled from January 2011 through June 2013 in collaboration with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 weeks, and all men were enrolled with written informed consent prior to treatment. Final follow-up date for current analysis was September 9, 2015.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality of life using the validated instrument Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices was assessed at baseline (pretreatment) and 3, 12, and 24 months after treatment. The instrument contains 4 domains-sexual dysfunction, urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems-each scored from 0 (no dysfunction) to 100 (maximum dysfunction). Propensity-weighted mean domain scores were compared between each treatment group vs active surveillance at each time point.

RESULTS

Of 1141 enrolled men, 314 pursued active surveillance (27.5%), 469 radical prostatectomy (41.1%), 249 external beam radiotherapy (21.8%), and 109 brachytherapy (9.6%). After propensity weighting, median age was 66 to 67 years across groups, and 77% to 80% of participants were white. Across groups, propensity-weighted mean baseline scores were 41.8 to 46.4 for sexual dysfunction, 20.8 to 22.8 for urinary obstruction and irritation, 9.7 to 10.5 for urinary incontinence, and 5.7 to 6.1 for bowel problems. Compared with active surveillance, mean sexual dysfunction scores worsened by 3 months for patients who received radical prostatectomy (36.2 [95% CI, 30.4-42.0]), external beam radiotherapy (13.9 [95% CI, 6.7-21.2]), and brachytherapy (17.1 [95% CI, 7.8-26.6]). Compared with active surveillance at 3 months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostatectomy (33.6 [95% CI, 27.8-39.2]); acute worsening of urinary obstruction and irritation with external beam radiotherapy (11.7 [95% CI, 8.7-14.8]) and brachytherapy (20.5 [95% CI, 15.1-25.9]); and worsened bowel symptoms with external beam radiotherapy (4.9 [95% CI, 2.4-7.4]). By 24 months, mean scores between treatment groups vs active surveillance were not significantly different in most domains.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, each treatment strategy was associated with distinct patterns of adverse effects over 2 years. These findings can be used to promote treatment decisions that incorporate individual preferences.

摘要

重要性

被诊断为局限性前列腺癌的患者必须在可能具有不同不良反应可能性的治疗策略之间做出抉择。

目的

比较根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放射治疗与主动监测后的生活质量(QOL)。

设计、地点和参与者:2011年1月至2013年6月,与北卡罗来纳州中央癌症登记处合作,纳入了1141名新诊断前列腺癌男性的基于人群的前瞻性队列(符合条件男性的参与率为57%)。从诊断到入组的中位时间为5周,所有男性在治疗前均签署书面知情同意书入组。当前分析的最终随访日期为2015年9月9日。

暴露因素

接受根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放射治疗或主动监测。

主要结局和测量指标

使用经过验证的工具前列腺癌症状指数在基线(治疗前)以及治疗后3、12和24个月评估生活质量。该工具包含4个领域——性功能障碍、尿路梗阻和刺激、尿失禁以及肠道问题——每个领域的评分从0(无功能障碍)到100(最大功能障碍)。在每个时间点比较每个治疗组与主动监测之间的倾向加权平均领域得分。

结果

在1141名入组男性中,314人进行主动监测(27.5%),469人接受根治性前列腺切除术(41.1%),249人接受外照射放疗(21.8%),109人接受近距离放射治疗(9.6%)。经过倾向加权后,各组的中位年龄为66至67岁,77%至80%的参与者为白人。在各组中,性功能障碍的倾向加权平均基线得分为41.8至46.4,尿路梗阻和刺激为20.8至22.8,尿失禁为9.7至10.5,肠道问题为5.7至6.1。与主动监测相比,接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者(36.2 [95% CI,30.4 - 42.0])、外照射放疗的患者(13.9 [95% CI,6.7 - 21.2])和近距离放射治疗的患者(17.1 [95% CI,7.8 - 26.6])在3个月时性功能障碍平均得分恶化。与主动监测在3个月时相比,根治性前列腺切除术与尿失禁恶化相关(33.6 [95% CI,27.8 - 39.2]);外照射放疗(11.7 [95% CI,8.7 - 14.8])和近距离放射治疗(20.5 [95% CI,15.1 - 25.9])与尿路梗阻和刺激急性恶化相关;外照射放疗与肠道症状恶化相关(4.9 [95% CI,2.4 - 7.4])。到24个月时,大多数领域中治疗组与主动监测之间的平均得分无显著差异。

结论与相关性

在这个局限性前列腺癌男性队列中,每种治疗策略在2年内都与不同的不良反应模式相关。这些发现可用于促进纳入个人偏好的治疗决策。