Suppr超能文献

局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放疗或主动监测的选择与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。

Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Chen Ronald C, Basak Ramsankar, Meyer Anne-Marie, Kuo Tzy-Mey, Carpenter William R, Agans Robert P, Broughman James R, Reeve Bryce B, Nielsen Matthew E, Usinger Deborah S, Spearman Kiayni C, Walden Sarah, Kaleel Dianne, Anderson Mary, Stürmer Til, Godley Paul A

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill2Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill3Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1652.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have to decide among treatment strategies that may differ in their likelihood of adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life (QOL) after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy vs active surveillance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based prospective cohort of 1141 men (57% participation among eligible men) with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were enrolled from January 2011 through June 2013 in collaboration with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 weeks, and all men were enrolled with written informed consent prior to treatment. Final follow-up date for current analysis was September 9, 2015.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality of life using the validated instrument Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices was assessed at baseline (pretreatment) and 3, 12, and 24 months after treatment. The instrument contains 4 domains-sexual dysfunction, urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems-each scored from 0 (no dysfunction) to 100 (maximum dysfunction). Propensity-weighted mean domain scores were compared between each treatment group vs active surveillance at each time point.

RESULTS

Of 1141 enrolled men, 314 pursued active surveillance (27.5%), 469 radical prostatectomy (41.1%), 249 external beam radiotherapy (21.8%), and 109 brachytherapy (9.6%). After propensity weighting, median age was 66 to 67 years across groups, and 77% to 80% of participants were white. Across groups, propensity-weighted mean baseline scores were 41.8 to 46.4 for sexual dysfunction, 20.8 to 22.8 for urinary obstruction and irritation, 9.7 to 10.5 for urinary incontinence, and 5.7 to 6.1 for bowel problems. Compared with active surveillance, mean sexual dysfunction scores worsened by 3 months for patients who received radical prostatectomy (36.2 [95% CI, 30.4-42.0]), external beam radiotherapy (13.9 [95% CI, 6.7-21.2]), and brachytherapy (17.1 [95% CI, 7.8-26.6]). Compared with active surveillance at 3 months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostatectomy (33.6 [95% CI, 27.8-39.2]); acute worsening of urinary obstruction and irritation with external beam radiotherapy (11.7 [95% CI, 8.7-14.8]) and brachytherapy (20.5 [95% CI, 15.1-25.9]); and worsened bowel symptoms with external beam radiotherapy (4.9 [95% CI, 2.4-7.4]). By 24 months, mean scores between treatment groups vs active surveillance were not significantly different in most domains.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, each treatment strategy was associated with distinct patterns of adverse effects over 2 years. These findings can be used to promote treatment decisions that incorporate individual preferences.

摘要

重要性

被诊断为局限性前列腺癌的患者必须在可能具有不同不良反应可能性的治疗策略之间做出抉择。

目的

比较根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放射治疗与主动监测后的生活质量(QOL)。

设计、地点和参与者:2011年1月至2013年6月,与北卡罗来纳州中央癌症登记处合作,纳入了1141名新诊断前列腺癌男性的基于人群的前瞻性队列(符合条件男性的参与率为57%)。从诊断到入组的中位时间为5周,所有男性在治疗前均签署书面知情同意书入组。当前分析的最终随访日期为2015年9月9日。

暴露因素

接受根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、近距离放射治疗或主动监测。

主要结局和测量指标

使用经过验证的工具前列腺癌症状指数在基线(治疗前)以及治疗后3、12和24个月评估生活质量。该工具包含4个领域——性功能障碍、尿路梗阻和刺激、尿失禁以及肠道问题——每个领域的评分从0(无功能障碍)到100(最大功能障碍)。在每个时间点比较每个治疗组与主动监测之间的倾向加权平均领域得分。

结果

在1141名入组男性中,314人进行主动监测(27.5%),469人接受根治性前列腺切除术(41.1%),249人接受外照射放疗(21.8%),109人接受近距离放射治疗(9.6%)。经过倾向加权后,各组的中位年龄为66至67岁,77%至80%的参与者为白人。在各组中,性功能障碍的倾向加权平均基线得分为41.8至46.4,尿路梗阻和刺激为20.8至22.8,尿失禁为9.7至10.5,肠道问题为5.7至6.1。与主动监测相比,接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者(36.2 [95% CI,30.4 - 42.0])、外照射放疗的患者(13.9 [95% CI,6.7 - 21.2])和近距离放射治疗的患者(17.1 [95% CI,7.8 - 26.6])在3个月时性功能障碍平均得分恶化。与主动监测在3个月时相比,根治性前列腺切除术与尿失禁恶化相关(33.6 [95% CI,27.8 - 39.2]);外照射放疗(11.7 [95% CI,8.7 - 14.8])和近距离放射治疗(20.5 [95% CI,15.1 - 25.9])与尿路梗阻和刺激急性恶化相关;外照射放疗与肠道症状恶化相关(4.9 [95% CI,2.4 - 7.4])。到24个月时,大多数领域中治疗组与主动监测之间的平均得分无显著差异。

结论与相关性

在这个局限性前列腺癌男性队列中,每种治疗策略在2年内都与不同的不良反应模式相关。这些发现可用于促进纳入个人偏好的治疗决策。

相似文献

4
Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment.
JAMA. 2024 Jan 23;331(4):302-317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491.
6
Quality of life impact of treatments for localized prostate cancer: cohort study with a 5 year follow-up.
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

3
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting Gleason score upgrade in prostate cancer.
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-178. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of prostate brachytherapy for low risk prostate cancer: Is the decline overstated?
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016 Aug;8(4):289-93. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61942. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
Relief of Urinary Symptom Burden after Primary Prostate Cancer Treatment.
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.101. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
5
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
6
The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
10
Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验