Barvelink B, Kok M J, Smidt S, Lakwijk K F C, Verhaar J A N, Reijman M, Colaris J W
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 31;145(1):326. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05910-z.
Successfully reduced distal radius fractures (DRFs) often redisplace while casted. Poor cast moulding might be a risk factor for redisplacement of DRFs. This study aims to assess whether cast moulding quality, as determined by casting indices, impact the risk of redisplacement. Also, we assessed the influence of the cast applicant and the material used on the redisplacement risk.
We retrospectively reviewed cases from a prospective cohort (trial registration NL8311). We included 172 adequately reduced and circumferentially casted DRFs with a complete two-week radiographic follow-up. Fracture alignment was measured on all radiographs (trauma, post-reduction and follow-up) in accordance with the Dutch guideline for DRFs. When unacceptably aligned after 2 weeks, the DRF was labelled as redisplaced. Cast moulding quality was measured using the Three Point Index (TPI), Cast Index (CI) and Gap Index (GI). A TPI > 0.8, CI > 0.7 and GI > 0.15 implicates poor cast moulding. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the influence of cast moulding quality, cast applicant and casting material on the redisplacement risk. We corrected for patient age, intra-articular involvement, the degree of radial inclination and radial shortening.
Redisplacement occurred in 40% of DRFs. The mean index scores were poor (TPI 0.94, CI 0.85, GI 0.22), indicating generally suboptimal cast moulding quality. None of the cast indices were significantly associated to redisplacement (OR [95% CI]: TPI 1.2 [0.6 to 2.5], CI 2.4 [0.7 to 15.7], GI 1.6 [0.7 to 4.0]). DRFs casted by nurse practitioners had significantly lower odds of redisplacement compared to those casted by emergency room nurses. Type of casting (synthetic versus plaster of Paris) was not associated with redisplacement.
Cast moulding quality, measured using cast indices, is not associated with redisplacement of reduced DRFs. Casts applied by nurse practitioners redisplaced significantly less often.
Therapeutic Studies level III.
成功复位的桡骨远端骨折(DRF)在石膏固定期间常出现再移位。石膏塑形不佳可能是DRF再移位的一个危险因素。本研究旨在评估由石膏指数确定的石膏塑形质量是否会影响再移位风险。此外,我们还评估了打石膏人员和所用材料对再移位风险的影响。
我们回顾性分析了一个前瞻性队列中的病例(试验注册号NL8311)。我们纳入了172例复位良好且进行了环形石膏固定的DRF,并进行了为期两周的完整影像学随访。根据荷兰DRF指南,在所有X线片(创伤时、复位后和随访时)上测量骨折对线情况。如果在2周后对线情况不理想,则将DRF标记为再移位。使用三点指数(TPI)、石膏指数(CI)和间隙指数(GI)来测量石膏塑形质量。TPI>0.8、CI>0.7和GI>0.15表明石膏塑形不佳。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来研究石膏塑形质量、打石膏人员和石膏材料对再移位风险的影响。我们对患者年龄、关节内受累情况、桡骨倾斜度和桡骨缩短程度进行了校正。
40%的DRF出现了再移位。平均指数评分较差(TPI为0.94,CI为0.85,GI为0.22),表明总体石膏塑形质量欠佳。没有一个石膏指数与再移位显著相关(OR[95%CI]:TPI为1.2[0.6至2.5],CI为2.4[0.7至15.7],GI为1.6[0.7至4.0])。与由急诊室护士打石膏的DRF相比,由执业护士打石膏的DRF再移位的几率显著更低。石膏类型(合成材料与巴黎石膏)与再移位无关。
使用石膏指数测量的石膏塑形质量与复位后的DRF再移位无关。由执业护士应用的石膏再移位的情况明显较少。
治疗性研究III级。