Sheng Siyuan, Silva Erin M, Ricke Steven C, Claus James R
Meat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery, Department of Animal & Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Poult Sci. 2025 May 28;104(8):105370. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105370.
Deli-style turkey breast products were cured with sodium nitrite (SN), pre-converted conventional grown celery (CEL), Swiss Chard (SC), organic grown celery (OCEL), and organic Swiss Chard (OSW) with an ingoing sodium nitrite equivalent of 150 ppm and salt content of 1.60 %. Cured and total meat pigments, total myoglobin content, and salt content were assessed on day 0; color, pH, and residual nitrite were evaluated on days 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60. A 24-h color depletion study was conducted on all treatments (TRTs) after storage (day 15). Consumer panelists were recruited to evaluate sensory attributes of all TRTs. During the storage and light display, SN exhibited the lightest color and the lowest (P < 0.05) levels of yellowness. At 0 h, Celery TRTs demonstrated lower (P < 0.05) hue angle compared to Swiss chard TRTs. This color difference gradually becomes unnoticeable by the conclusion of the test. Furthermore, the choice between organic and non-organic curing does not affect the color of the finished products. Sensory results indicated that OSW exhibited greater earthiness (P < 0.05) than all other TRTs, except for CEL, which showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Sensory evaluation results also indicated that OSW displayed the greatest non-meat aftertaste (P < 0.001) than all other TRTs and lower bitterness (P = 0.009) than SN. However, regardless of the different plant sources of nitrite (Celery or Swiss Chard) and growing practice of plant powder (conventional or organic), sensory evaluation found that these alternative cures were equivalent (P > 0.05) to SN in overall liking difference and relevant purchase intent. Volatile compounds (VOCs) analysis revealed a distinctively different distribution of VOCs among the different sources of nitrite. The presence of terpene alcohol and lower abundance of aldehydes in OSW could explain the findings identified in the sensory evaluation.
熟食风格的火鸡胸肉产品用亚硝酸钠(SN)、预转化的传统种植芹菜(CEL)、瑞士甜菜(SC)、有机种植芹菜(OCEL)和有机瑞士甜菜(OSW)进行腌制,亚硝酸钠当量为150 ppm,盐含量为1.60%。在第0天评估腌制肉和总肉色素、总肌红蛋白含量和盐含量;在第0、15、30、45和60天评估颜色、pH值和残留亚硝酸盐。储存(第15天)后对所有处理组(TRTs)进行了24小时的颜色损耗研究。招募消费者小组成员评估所有TRTs的感官特性。在储存和光照展示期间,SN呈现出最浅的颜色和最低(P<0.05)的黄度水平。在0小时时,芹菜TRTs的色调角低于(P<0.05)瑞士甜菜TRTs。到测试结束时,这种颜色差异逐渐变得不明显。此外,有机腌制和非有机腌制的选择不会影响成品的颜色。感官结果表明,除了CEL没有显著差异(P>0.05)外,OSW比所有其他TRTs表现出更大的土腥味(P<0.05)。感官评价结果还表明,OSW比所有其他TRTs表现出最大的非肉后味(P<0.001),且苦味低于SN(P=0.009)。然而,无论亚硝酸盐的植物来源(芹菜或瑞士甜菜)以及植物粉的种植方式(传统或有机)如何,感官评价发现这些替代腌制方法在总体喜好差异和相关购买意愿方面与SN相当(P>0.05)。挥发性化合物(VOCs)分析揭示了不同亚硝酸盐来源之间VOCs分布明显不同。OSW中萜烯醇的存在和醛类含量较低可以解释感官评价中发现的结果。