Kudlek Laura, Mueller Julia, Eustachio Colombo Patricia, Sharp Stephen J, Boothby Clare E, Griffin Simon J, Butryn Meghan, Chwyl Christina, Forman Evan, Hagerman Charlotte, Hawkins Misty, Juarascio Adrienne, Knäuper Bärbel, Kolehmainen Marjukka, Levin Michael E, Lillis Jason, Maiz Edurne, Manasse Stephanie, Palmeira Lara, Pietiläinen Kirsi H, Sherwood Nancy E, Ahern Amy
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf039.
Identifying mechanisms of action can aid the refinement of weight management interventions. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based interventions may support long-term weight management by improving self-regulation of eating behavior traits (EBTs). However, it remains unclear if changing EBTs like emotional eating, external eating, internal disinhibition, and restraint during ACT causes improved weight management.
For this 1-stage Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis, we requested IPD from 9 trials identified through a systematic search of ACT-based interventions for adults with a body mass index >25 kg/m2 across 8 databases until June 20, 2022. We obtained, checked, and harmonized data from 8 of those trials (N = 1391) and conducted separate structural equation models with complex survey analysis to estimate short- and long-term mediating effects of changes in each EBT on percent weight change.
In the short-term (ie, follow-up closest to intervention end), we found indirect effects of the intervention on percent weight change through changes in emotional eating, external eating, internal disinhibition, and restraint. Each 1-unit change in these EBTs led to a 0.02% (95% CI, 0.05-0.001), 0.03% (95% CI, 0.06-0.001), 0.05% (95% CI, 0.11-0.02), and 0.09% (95% CI, 0.14-0.04) decrease in weight, respectively. In the long term (ie, 12 months after intervention end), we found both indirect and total effects for emotional eating, internal disinhibition, and restraint, with EBT changes explaining 23.78%, 23.12%, and 25.64% of total effects.
Findings suggest small partial mediating effects of ACT on weight through EBTs. Targeting EBTs may support improved weight management outcomes, particularly in the long term.
确定作用机制有助于完善体重管理干预措施。基于接受与承诺疗法(ACT)的干预措施可能通过改善饮食行为特征(EBT)的自我调节来支持长期体重管理。然而,在ACT过程中改变诸如情绪化饮食、外部饮食、内部去抑制和克制等EBT是否会改善体重管理仍不清楚。
对于这项单阶段个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,我们通过系统检索8个数据库中针对体重指数>25 kg/m²的成年人的基于ACT的干预措施,截至2022年6月20日,从9项试验中获取IPD。我们从其中8项试验(N = 1391)中获取、检查并统一数据,并进行单独的结构方程模型和复杂调查分析,以估计每种EBT变化对体重变化百分比的短期和长期中介效应。
在短期内(即最接近干预结束时的随访),我们发现干预通过情绪化饮食、外部饮食、内部去抑制和克制的变化对体重变化百分比有间接影响。这些EBT每变化1个单位,体重分别下降0.02%(95%CI,0.05 - 0.001)、0.03%(95%CI,0.06 - 0.001)、0.05%(95%CI,0.11 - 0.02)和0.09%(95%CI,0.14 - 0.04)。在长期内(即干预结束后12个月),我们发现情绪化饮食、内部去抑制和克制既有间接效应也有总效应,EBT变化分别解释了总效应的23.78%、23.12%和25.64%。
研究结果表明ACT通过EBT对体重有小的部分中介效应。针对EBT可能有助于改善体重管理结果,尤其是在长期。