Suppr超能文献

惊厥作为婴儿死亡原因:基于四个欧洲城市(1800 - 1955年)证据的新见解

Convulsions as a cause of infant death: New insights into its meaning based on evidence from four European cities (1800-1955).

作者信息

Wienholts Karin, Murkens Mayra, Raftakis Michail, Mühlichen Michael

机构信息

Department of History, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Hist. 2025 Jun 2;69(2):1-22. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2025.7.

Abstract

In recent years, the digitisation of historical data containing cause-of-death information has significantly increased. However, these data show considerable variations in diagnostic practices and nosology over time and place. Examining vague historical causes of death, often denoting symptoms rather than specific diseases, is a particular challenge. Infantile convulsions are an example of a common yet problematic cause of death. To improve our understanding of infantile convulsions, we propose an innovative mixed-methods, comparative approach. This study combines qualitative analyses of historical medical thinking on infantile convulsions with quantitative analyses of individual-level death records from four European cities: Amsterdam, Hermoupolis, Maastricht, and Rostock, covering different periods between 1800 and 1955. Our findings reveal that infant deaths attributed to convulsions encompass a multitude of causes from different disease categories. Significant differences emerged in the patterns of convulsions across time, age groups, and locations, even within the same country. The decline in convulsions mortality seems to be more related to the introduction of uniform registration regulations and systems, and advancements in medical knowledge than to the decline in overall infant mortality. This study's outcome serves as a cautionary note that challenges the prevailing attitude towards convulsions and emphasises the complexity of interpreting deaths from convulsions. These were highly dependent on historical context, especially local medical culture and the variable accuracy of cause-of-death registration. These findings have implications for studies on infant mortality even when the main interest of such studies is not convulsions mortality.

摘要

近年来,包含死因信息的历史数据数字化程度显著提高。然而,这些数据显示,诊断方法和疾病分类在时间和地点上存在相当大的差异。研究模糊的历史死因(通常指症状而非特定疾病)是一项特殊挑战。婴儿惊厥就是一个常见但有问题的死因实例。为增进我们对婴儿惊厥的理解,我们提出一种创新的混合方法、比较性方法。本研究将对婴儿惊厥的历史医学思维进行定性分析,与对来自四个欧洲城市(阿姆斯特丹、埃尔穆波利、马斯特里赫特和罗斯托克)的个体层面死亡记录进行定量分析相结合,涵盖1800年至1955年的不同时期。我们的研究结果表明,归因于惊厥的婴儿死亡包含来自不同疾病类别的多种原因。即使在同一个国家内,惊厥模式在时间、年龄组和地点方面也出现了显著差异。惊厥死亡率的下降似乎更多地与统一登记法规和系统的引入以及医学知识的进步有关,而不是与总体婴儿死亡率的下降有关。本研究结果敲响了警钟,挑战了对惊厥的普遍态度,并强调了解读惊厥死亡的复杂性。这些高度依赖于历史背景,尤其是当地医学文化和死因登记的可变准确性。这些发现对婴儿死亡率研究具有启示意义,即使此类研究的主要兴趣并非惊厥死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/12170937/c27068d4b756/S0025727325000079_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验