McKeown Robert E
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, Director, Health Sciences Research Core, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208,
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009 Jul 1;3(1 Suppl):19S-26S. doi: 10.1177/1559827609335350.
The epidemiologic transition describes changing patterns of population age distributions, mortality, fertility, life expectancy, and causes of death. A number of critiques of the theory have revealed limitations, including an insufficient account of the role of poverty in determining disease risk and mortality, a failure to distinguish adequately the risk of dying from a given cause or set of causes from the relative contributions of various causes of death to overall mortality, and oversimplification of the transition patterns, which do not fit neatly into either historical periods or geographic locations. Recent developments in epidemiologic methods reveal other limitations. A life course perspective prompts examination of changes in causal pathways across the life span when considering shifts in the age distribution of a population as described by the epidemiologic transition theory. The ecological model assumes multiple levels of determinants acting in complex and interrelated ways, with higher level determinants exhibiting emergent properties. Development, testing, and implementation of innovative approaches to reduce the risks associated with the sedentary lifestyle and hyper nutrition in developed countries should not overshadow the continuing threat from infectious diseases, especially resistant strains or newly encountered agents. Interventions must fit populations and the threats to health they experience, while anticipating changes that will emerge with success in some areas. This will require new ways of thinking that go beyond the epidemiologic transition theory.
流行病学转变描述了人口年龄分布、死亡率、生育率、预期寿命和死亡原因的变化模式。对该理论的一些批评揭示了其局限性,包括对贫困在确定疾病风险和死亡率方面的作用阐述不足,未能充分区分因特定病因或一组病因死亡的风险与各种死因对总体死亡率的相对贡献,以及对转变模式的过度简化,这些模式并不完全符合历史时期或地理位置。流行病学方法的最新发展揭示了其他局限性。生命历程视角促使在考虑流行病学转变理论所描述的人口年龄分布变化时,审视整个生命跨度因果路径的变化。生态模型假定多个层面的决定因素以复杂且相互关联的方式起作用,更高层面的决定因素呈现出涌现特性。在发达国家,开发、测试和实施创新方法以降低与久坐不动的生活方式和营养过剩相关的风险,不应掩盖传染病持续构成的威胁,尤其是耐药菌株或新出现的病原体。干预措施必须适合人群及其所面临的健康威胁,同时要预见某些领域取得成功后将会出现的变化。这将需要超越流行病学转变理论的新思维方式。