Cassidy Rachel, Semwanga Agnes Rwashana, Binyaruka Peter, Blanchet Karl, Singh Neha S, Maiba John, Borghi Josephine
Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
SSM Health Syst. 2025 Jun;4:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100040.
Payment for performance (P4P) is not a uniform intervention, with programme effect dependent on several interconnected factors. In this study, a system dynamics model was developed to explore the pathways to improved outcomes and how changes in the design, implementation and context of a P4P programme affected maternal and child health (MCH) service delivery outcomes in Tanzania. A previously developed causal loop diagram of the programme effects was used to inform model development, with further data sources (including an impact evaluation of programme, health surveys, stakeholder feedback and relevant literature) used to build the model. A number of pathways were identified to improved services under P4P, with increased availability of drugs underpinning the content of care outcome (intermittent preventative treatment during ANC), which together with increased supervision, enhanced health worker motivation. This in turn increased perceived quality of care at the facility which improved the coverage of services outcome (facility-based deliveries), and with increased outreach, increased awareness of services also boosted demand. Minor delays in payment reduced provider purchasing power for medicines, with severe delays driving erosion of provider trust and motivation for programme participation. Allocating a larger share of funds for facility operations can enhance performance effects, particularly for those services that rely on efficient drug administration. Contextual factors including limited baseline provision of essential medications, lower community awareness of facility services and dispersed/distant populations reduced programme effect. This paper demonstrates the feasibility and the potential of such models to inform the design of effective health system interventions.
按绩效付费(P4P)并非一种统一的干预措施,其项目效果取决于若干相互关联的因素。在本研究中,开发了一个系统动力学模型,以探索改善结果的途径,以及P4P项目在设计、实施和背景方面的变化如何影响坦桑尼亚的母婴健康(MCH)服务提供结果。先前开发的项目效果因果循环图为模型开发提供了参考,同时使用了更多数据源(包括项目影响评估、健康调查、利益相关者反馈和相关文献)来构建模型。确定了一些在P4P下改善服务的途径,药品供应增加支撑了护理结果的内容(孕期保健期间的间歇性预防治疗),这与监督增加一起,增强了卫生工作者的积极性。这反过来又提高了医疗机构的护理感知质量,改善了服务结果的覆盖率(机构分娩),并且随着外展工作的增加,服务意识的提高也促进了需求。支付方面的轻微延迟降低了提供者购买药品的能力,严重延迟则导致提供者对项目参与的信任和积极性受到侵蚀。为机构运营分配更大份额的资金可以增强绩效效果,特别是对于那些依赖高效药物管理的服务。包括基本药物基线供应有限、社区对机构服务的认知度较低以及人口分散/偏远等背景因素降低了项目效果。本文展示了此类模型为有效卫生系统干预措施设计提供信息的可行性和潜力。