• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方案:与社区组织采用共同生产和同伴研究方法,为共同生产与同伴研究中心(CoPPeR)网络制定蓝图。

Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.

作者信息

Mahmood Nazish, McEachan Rosemary R C, Lockyer Bridget, Parekh Chloe, Cartwright Chris, Balaz Daniel, Akhtar Gulsoom, Hall Jennifer, Batty Lauren, Amin Tahira, Huma Dogra Zille, Islam Shahid

机构信息

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.

University of Bradford, Bradford, England, UK.

出版信息

NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 2;5:27. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1
PMID:40453367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12123296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community inclusive approaches in research contribute to the quality and impact of health outcomes, yet communities often lack considerable influence over research processes. The Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network aims to redress this gap by fostering equitable partnerships between communities, researchers, and policymakers. This paper outlines the protocol for establishing the CoPPeR network in Bradford, UK, where community-driven research initiatives are crucial for addressing local health disparities.

METHODS

We will implement four work-packages using participatory research methods and citizen science approaches. We will collaborate with four community organisations, each located in geographically distinct neighbourhoods serving diverse communities. Together we will co-produce citizen science projects to explore the impact of local environments on residents' health and wellbeing. We will build capacity through providing funding and training to community organisations who will recruit 20 peer researchers across the four areas to design, implement, and analyse their individual research projects. We will co-evaluate the co-production processes in a concomitant way through stakeholder workshops. Finally, we will explore the readiness and opportunities for statutory health and research partners to embed the CoPPeR network.

RESULTS

Anticipated results include comprehensive case studies revealing the factors which affect health and wellbeing in each of the case study sites along with the mechanisms of co-production strategies for enhancing community influence in research. The evaluation will provide us with evidence on what works for which communities; this will be crucial to support our plans for developing a network to augment efforts to advance community inclusive approaches.

CONCLUSION

The CoPPeR network aims to enable long-term sustainable partnership between researchers, decision makers and seldom heard communities which will enable effective co-production of research and policy. By detailing our experiences and outcomes we hope that others, both in the UK and internationally, can learn from and replicate our approach.

摘要

背景

研究中的社区包容性方法有助于提高健康结果的质量和影响力,但社区在研究过程中往往缺乏足够的影响力。共同生产与同伴研究(CoPPeR)网络旨在通过促进社区、研究人员和政策制定者之间的公平伙伴关系来弥补这一差距。本文概述了在英国布拉德福德建立CoPPeR网络的方案,在那里,社区驱动的研究倡议对于解决当地的健康差距至关重要。

方法

我们将采用参与式研究方法和公民科学方法实施四个工作包。我们将与四个社区组织合作,每个组织位于地理位置不同、服务不同社区的街区。我们将共同开展公民科学项目,以探索当地环境对居民健康和福祉的影响。我们将通过向社区组织提供资金和培训来建设能力,这些组织将在四个地区招募20名同伴研究人员,以设计、实施和分析他们各自的研究项目。我们将通过利益相关者研讨会以同步的方式共同评估共同生产过程。最后,我们将探索法定健康和研究伙伴建立CoPPeR网络的准备情况和机会。

结果

预期结果包括全面的案例研究,揭示影响每个案例研究地点健康和福祉的因素,以及增强社区在研究中影响力的共同生产策略机制。评估将为我们提供关于哪些方法对哪些社区有效的证据;这对于支持我们发展一个网络以加强推进社区包容性方法的努力的计划至关重要。

结论

CoPPeR网络旨在促成研究人员、决策者和很少被倾听的社区之间的长期可持续伙伴关系,从而实现研究与政策的有效共同生产。通过详细介绍我们的经验和成果,我们希望英国和国际上的其他人能够借鉴并复制我们的方法。

相似文献

1
Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.方案:与社区组织采用共同生产和同伴研究方法,为共同生产与同伴研究中心(CoPPeR)网络制定蓝图。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 2;5:27. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Create to Collaborate: using creative activity and participatory performance in online workshops to build collaborative research relationships.为合作而创作:在在线工作坊中运用创意活动和参与式表演来建立合作研究关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00512-8.
3
Ready, set, co(produce): a co-operative inquiry into co-producing research to explore adolescent health and wellbeing in the Born in Bradford Age of Wonder project.准备,开始,共同(产出):在布拉德福德奇迹时代项目中,对共同开展研究以探索青少年健康与幸福进行的合作性探究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00578-y.
4
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
5
Exploratory study from an end-of-life research partnership network to improve access for ethnically diverse communities in one region.一项来自临终关怀研究合作网络的探索性研究,旨在改善某一地区不同种族社区的医疗服务可及性。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 11:1-23. doi: 10.3310/MWHY5612.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
8
Qualitative Study定性研究
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
"We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust" …. Involving and engaging 'seldom listened to' community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach.“我们并非难以接触,但我们可能发现难以信任”……让“很少被倾听”的社区声音参与到临床转化健康研究中:一种社会创新方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 26;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Ready, set, co(produce): a co-operative inquiry into co-producing research to explore adolescent health and wellbeing in the Born in Bradford Age of Wonder project.准备,开始,共同(产出):在布拉德福德奇迹时代项目中,对共同开展研究以探索青少年健康与幸福进行的合作性探究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00578-y.
2
The effects of exposure to NO, PM and PM on health service attendances with respiratory illnesses: A time-series analysis.NO、PM 和 PM 暴露对呼吸系统疾病就诊的影响:时间序列分析。
Environ Pollut. 2023 Sep 15;333:122123. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122123. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
People powered research: what do communities identify as important for happy and healthy children and young people? A multi-disciplinary community research priority setting exercise in the City of Bradford, United Kingdom (UK).民众推动的研究:社区认为哪些因素对儿童和青少年的快乐和健康重要?英国布拉德福德市的一项多学科社区研究重点制定工作。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 25;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01881-y.
4
Nothing about us without us: A co-production strategy for communities, researchers and stakeholders to identify ways of improving health and reducing inequalities.没有我们(被服务对象)的参与,就没有我们(服务提供方)的一切:一种社区、研究人员和利益攸关方共同制定的生产策略,旨在确定改善健康和减少不平等的方法。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):836-846. doi: 10.1111/hex.13709. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
5
Exploring the Interactions between Housing and Neighbourhood Environments for Enhanced Child Wellbeing: The Lived Experience of Parents Living in Areas of High Child Poverty in England, UK.探索住房和邻里环境的相互作用,以增强儿童福祉:英国高儿童贫困地区父母的生活体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 1;19(19):12563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912563.
6
Shaping Pathways to Child Health: A Systematic Review of Street-Scale Interventions in City Streets.塑造儿童健康之路:城市街道中街头尺度干预的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;19(9):5227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095227.
7
Ripple effects mapping: capturing the wider impacts of systems change efforts in public health.涟漪效应映射:捕捉公共卫生系统变革努力的更广泛影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01570-4.
8
Measuring the Built Environment in Studies of Child Health-A Meta-Narrative Review of Associations.测量儿童健康研究中的建成环境——关联的元叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10741. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010741.
9
Urban environment and cognitive and motor function in children from four European birth cohorts.城市环境与四个欧洲出生队列儿童的认知和运动功能。
Environ Int. 2022 Jan;158:106933. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106933. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
Taking a deep breath: a qualitative study exploring acceptability and perceived unintended consequences of charging clean air zones and air quality improvement initiatives amongst low-income, multi-ethnic communities in Bradford, UK.深呼吸:一项定性研究,探索在英国布拉德福德的低收入、多族裔社区中,收取清洁空气区和改善空气质量举措的可接受性和感知到的意外后果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11337-z.