Suppr超能文献

我们的本地实践指南在院外心脏骤停难治性室颤患者复苏后期应用的初步结果

First Results of Our Local Practice Guide Used During the Late Phase of Resuscitation in Patients with Refractory VF in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

作者信息

Slagt Cornelis, Van Kuijk Sander M J, Bruhn Jörgen, Van Geffen Geert Jan, Mommers Lars

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2025 May 28;17:203-213. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S510483. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation (rVF) is a clinical challenge. If rVF is still present after standard advanced life support (ALS) guideline care, including amiodaron administration, other therapeutic options might be necessary. Based on the available evidence and expertise, our Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) team developed a local practice guide for the prolonged resuscitation of patients in rVF and implemented this as standard HEMS care in March 2022.

METHODS

This database study contains all patients treated with our local practice guide during out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with rVF beyond the fifth regular ALS shock-block. This local practice HEMS treatment algorithm consisted of, among others, cessation of epinephrine and alternating administration of esmolol and norepinephrine combined with enoximone. Data were derived from the HEMS database and the treating hospitals. Primary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation. Secondary outcome was defined as survival to hospital discharge and cerebral performance. This outcome was compared to the literature to analyze for inferiority of treatment.

RESULTS

In a 21-month period, HEMS was 761 times deployed for OHCA. Nineteen patients were treated with the local practice guide, nine patients (47%) were admitted to hospital with return of spontaneous circulation. Median resuscitation time was 22min. Hospital survival with good neurology was achieved in 42% vs 17% as expected. Exact Clopper-Pearson and logistic regression analysis revealed non-inferiority of the local practice guide. Withholding epinephrine was achieved in 84% of patients. A total of 79% and 90% of patients received esmolol and norepinephrine/enoximone mixture, respectively. Alternative defibrillation positions were indicated in 18 patients but applied in only 6 (33%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with persisting VF despite prolonged advanced life support care, a multifaceted bundle of care approach shows promising results and warrants further research. Alternative drug administrations were found to be substantially easier to achieve compared to alternative defibrillation positions.

摘要

目的

难治性室颤(rVF)的治疗是一项临床挑战。如果在包括使用胺碘酮在内的标准高级生命支持(ALS)指南治疗后仍存在rVF,则可能需要其他治疗选择。基于现有证据和专业知识,我们的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)团队制定了一份针对rVF患者延长复苏的本地实践指南,并于2022年3月将其作为HEMS的标准治疗措施实施。

方法

这项数据库研究纳入了所有在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)且rVF超出第五次常规ALS电击阻断后接受我们本地实践指南治疗的患者。该本地实践HEMS治疗算法包括,除其他外,停用肾上腺素以及交替使用艾司洛尔和去甲肾上腺素并联合依诺昔酮。数据来自HEMS数据库和治疗医院。主要结局是自主循环恢复。次要结局定义为存活至出院以及脑功能。将该结局与文献进行比较以分析治疗的劣势。

结果

在21个月的时间里,HEMS因OHCA出动了761次。19名患者接受了本地实践指南治疗,9名患者(47%)自主循环恢复后入院。复苏时间中位数为22分钟。实现良好神经功能的医院存活率为42%,而预期为17%。确切的克洛普 - 皮尔逊检验和逻辑回归分析显示本地实践指南无劣势。84%的患者停用了肾上腺素。分别有79%和90%的患者接受了艾司洛尔和去甲肾上腺素/依诺昔酮混合物。18名患者被指示采用替代除颤位置,但仅实施了6例(33%)。

结论

对于尽管接受了延长的高级生命支持治疗仍持续存在室颤的患者,多方面的综合护理方法显示出有前景的结果,值得进一步研究。与替代除颤位置相比,发现替代药物给药实施起来要容易得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9881/12126989/4128814adf62/OAEM-17-203-g0003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验