Cantor D S, Andreassen C, Waters H S
J Exp Child Psychol. 1985 Oct;40(2):218-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(85)90086-4.
Relationships between verbalized knowledge (metamemory), strategy use, and performance were examined in a memory task for visually presented episodes. Kindergarten, second-grade, and fifth-grade students were asked to reconstruct a sequence of pictures forming an episode from an array of original pictures and foils. The episodes varied on two dimensions; materials type and the logic of the sequence. Materials were either typical (familiar animal characters and scenes) or atypical (geometric figures) story materials. Sequences either readily conveyed a story (logical) or were rearranged to present a random ordering of pictures (illogical). Children were questioned about their use of a story line to help remember the picture sequences (general questioning) and were asked more specific questions concerning the reasons for their picture selection during the task (specific questioning). Children at all ages recalled logical sequences better than illogical ones. Second- and fifth-grade children recalled animal episodes better than geometric form episodes. Children at all ages showed a correspondence between strategy use and metamemory as assessed by verbalization of relationships among pictures during the specific questioning. However, when the more typical general question format was used to assess metamemory, strategy use preceded verbalized knowledge of strategy use.
在一项针对视觉呈现情节的记忆任务中,研究了言语化知识(元记忆)、策略运用与表现之间的关系。研究要求幼儿园、二年级和五年级的学生从一系列原始图片和陪衬图片中重构构成一个情节的图片序列。情节在两个维度上有所不同:材料类型和序列的逻辑性。材料要么是典型的(熟悉的动物角色和场景),要么是非典型的(几何图形)故事材料。序列要么易于传达一个故事(合乎逻辑),要么被重新排列以呈现图片的随机顺序(不合逻辑)。研究人员询问孩子们是否使用故事情节来帮助记忆图片序列(一般性提问),并就他们在任务中选择图片的原因提出更具体的问题(具体提问)。所有年龄段的孩子回忆合乎逻辑的序列都比不合逻辑的序列更好。二年级和五年级的孩子回忆动物情节比几何图形情节更好。在具体提问过程中,通过对图片之间关系的言语化来评估,所有年龄段的孩子在策略运用和元记忆之间都表现出对应关系。然而,当使用更典型的一般性问题格式来评估元记忆时,策略运用先于策略运用的言语化知识。