Nakashima Saki, Sato Kenichiro, Niimi Yoshiki, Ihara Ryoko, Suzuki Kazushi, Iwata Atsushi, Toda Tatsushi, Iwatsubo Takeshi
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Department of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 29;11(2):e70102. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70102. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
Recently approved disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for early Alzheimer's disease (AD), including lecanemab and donanemab, require patients to meet specific eligibility criteria for treatment. These criteria define a limited "therapeutic time window," after which patients become ineligible as the disease advances. Understanding factors influencing this window may help clinicians optimize patient management and reduce lost treatment opportunities.
We analyzed longitudinal data from two observational cohorts, the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). At each visit, individuals were deemed eligible if they were amyloid-positive and had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 22-30 (lecanemab) or 20-30 (donanemab), plus a Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1. We then applied survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate time-to-ineligibility based on baseline cognitive status.
Across both datasets, higher baseline CDR-GS and MMSE were associated with a lower risk of becoming ineligible (pooled hazard ratio of 1.601 for CDR-GS of 1 vs. 0.5, and pooled hazard ratio of 0.660 per 1-point increase in MMSE score above the lower limit of eligibility). The estimated 75% survival time for patients with baseline CDR-GS 0.5 was over 12 months, suggesting only 25% would become ineligible within 12 months. For those with CDR-GS 1, the estimated 50% survival time was approximately 12 months, depending on the data, indicating that half might become ineligible within 1 year.
We quantitatively outlined the duration of the therapeutic time window for early AD patients who qualify for lecanemab or donanemab, which is significantly influenced by baseline CDR-GS and MMSE scores. These findings will support more proactive patient management, ensuring timely evaluations and prioritization of patients at higher risk of ineligibility, particularly where DMT access is limited.
We examined the "therapeutic time window" eligibility for disease-modifying therapy.Longitudinal data from National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were used to quantify eligibility duration.Higher Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) or lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline were associated with shorter window length.Our results will help optimize the management of the wait time for disease-modifying therapies (DMT) treatment.
最近获批用于早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)的疾病修饰疗法(DMT),包括乐卡奈单抗和多奈单抗,要求患者符合特定的治疗资格标准。这些标准定义了一个有限的“治疗时间窗”,疾病进展后患者将不再符合条件。了解影响这个时间窗的因素可能有助于临床医生优化患者管理并减少失去的治疗机会。
我们分析了来自两个观察性队列——国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(NACC)和阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)的纵向数据。每次就诊时,如果个体淀粉样蛋白呈阳性且简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分为22 - 30(乐卡奈单抗)或20 - 30(多奈单抗),加上临床痴呆评定量表 - 总体评分(CDR - GS)为0.5或1,则被视为符合条件。然后我们应用生存分析和Cox比例风险模型,根据基线认知状态估计失去资格的时间。
在两个数据集中,较高的基线CDR - GS和MMSE与失去资格的风险较低相关(CDR - GS为1时与0.5时的合并风险比为1.601,MMSE得分每高于资格下限1分,合并风险比为0.660)。基线CDR - GS为0.5的患者的估计75%生存时间超过12个月,这表明只有25%的患者会在12个月内失去资格。对于CDR - GS为1的患者,根据数据,估计50%生存时间约为12个月,这表明一半患者可能在1年内失去资格。
我们定量概述了符合乐卡奈单抗或多奈单抗治疗条件的早期AD患者的治疗时间窗持续时间,该时间窗受基线CDR - GS和MMSE得分的显著影响。这些发现将支持更积极主动的患者管理,确保对失去资格风险较高的患者进行及时评估和优先排序,特别是在DMT获取有限的情况下。
我们研究了疾病修饰疗法的“治疗时间窗”资格。使用来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(NACC)和阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)的纵向数据来量化资格持续时间。基线时较高的临床痴呆评定量表 - 总体评分(CDR - GS)或较低的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)与较短的时间窗长度相关。我们的结果将有助于优化疾病修饰疗法(DMT)治疗等待时间的管理。