• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数据驱动的2型糖尿病患者细分:德国急诊科就诊前医疗保健利用情况的观察性研究

Data-driven segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: an observational study on health care utilisation prior to an emergency department visit in Germany.

作者信息

Rupprecht Mirjam, Campione Alessandro, Wu Yves Noel, Fischer-Rosinský Antje, Slagman Anna, Riedlinger Dorothee, Möckel Martin, Keil Thomas, Reitzle Lukas, Henschke Cornelia

机构信息

Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Health Care Management, Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1509220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509220. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1509220
PMID:40454153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12122753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Potentially avoidable hospital admissions (PAHs) due to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) occur more frequently in Germany than in the rest of Europe. Emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in understanding cross-sectoral health care utilisation resulting in inpatient admissions. Segmenting T2DM patients in homogenous groups according to their health care utilisation may help to understand the population's needs and to allocate limited resources. The aim of this study was to describe ED use and subsequent inpatient admissions among T2DM patients, and to segment the study population into homogenous subgroups based on disease stage, health care utilisation and process quality of outpatient care prior to an ED visit.

METHODS

This study was conducted as part of the INDEED project, comprising data on 56,821 ED visits in 2016 attributable to 40,561 patients with T2DM from 13 German EDs, as well as statutory health insurance claims data from 2014 to 2016 retrospectively linked per patient. Descriptive analyses included patient characteristics, ED admission diagnoses and discharge diagnoses in the case of inpatient admission of T2DM patients to the ED. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify different subgroups of T2DM patients based on disease stage, number of physician contacts and medical examinations prior to the ED visit.

RESULTS

Almost half of the study population had severe comorbidities (44.3%). In addition to T2DM, multiple cardiovascular diagnoses were among the most frequently documented admission and discharge diagnoses. The proportion of hospitalised ED visits for T2DM patients was higher (59%) than that for the INDEED population (42.8%). We identified three latent classes that were characterised as " (36.5% of the study population), " (26.1%) and (37.4%).

CONCLUSION

A substantial share of T2DM patients had not received disease monitoring according to guideline recommendations prior to ED presentation. Improving guideline-adherence in the outpatient sector could help reduce potentially avoidable ED visits. Effective interventions that aim at improving continuity and quality of care as well as reducing the share of PAH need to be identified and evaluated per identified class.

摘要

背景

在德国,2型糖尿病(T2DM)导致的潜在可避免住院(PAHs)比欧洲其他地区更为频繁。急诊科(EDs)在理解导致住院的跨部门医疗保健利用方面发挥着重要作用。根据医疗保健利用情况将T2DM患者分为同质组,可能有助于了解人群需求并分配有限资源。本研究的目的是描述T2DM患者的急诊科使用情况及随后的住院情况,并根据疾病阶段、医疗保健利用情况以及急诊科就诊前门诊护理的过程质量,将研究人群分为同质亚组。

方法

本研究作为INDEED项目的一部分进行,包括2016年来自德国13个急诊科的40561例T2DM患者的56821次急诊科就诊数据,以及2014年至2016年每位患者的法定医疗保险理赔数据的回顾性关联。描述性分析包括患者特征、急诊科入院诊断以及T2DM患者在急诊科住院时的出院诊断。进行潜在类别分析以根据疾病阶段、急诊科就诊前的医生接触次数和医学检查确定T2DM患者的不同亚组。

结果

几乎一半的研究人群患有严重合并症(44.3%)。除了T2DM,多种心血管诊断是最常记录的入院和出院诊断之一。T2DM患者的住院急诊科就诊比例(59%)高于INDEED人群(42.8%)。我们确定了三个潜在类别,分别为“(占研究人群的36.5%)”、“(26.1%)”和“(37.4%)”。

结论

相当一部分T2DM患者在急诊科就诊前未按照指南建议接受疾病监测。提高门诊部门对指南的依从性有助于减少潜在可避免的急诊科就诊。需要针对每个确定的类别确定并评估旨在改善护理连续性和质量以及减少PAH比例的有效干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/5eb1d5e04636/fmed-12-1509220-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/17c20fab424b/fmed-12-1509220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/a7139a532d21/fmed-12-1509220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/9fe828bba4ce/fmed-12-1509220-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/5eb1d5e04636/fmed-12-1509220-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/17c20fab424b/fmed-12-1509220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/a7139a532d21/fmed-12-1509220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/9fe828bba4ce/fmed-12-1509220-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd8/12122753/5eb1d5e04636/fmed-12-1509220-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Data-driven segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: an observational study on health care utilisation prior to an emergency department visit in Germany.基于数据驱动的2型糖尿病患者细分:德国急诊科就诊前医疗保健利用情况的观察性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1509220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509220. eCollection 2025.
2
INDEED-Utilization and Cross-Sectoral Patterns of Care for Patients Admitted to Emergency Departments in Germany: Rationale and Study Design.德国急诊科收治患者的利用情况和跨部门护理模式:基本原理和研究设计。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;9:616857. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.616857. eCollection 2021.
3
Recording early deaths following emergency department visits in inpatient data: An observational study using data of 16 German hospitals.记录急诊就诊后的早期死亡:使用 16 家德国医院数据的观察性研究。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Apr;177:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.12.003. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Applying a data-driven population segmentation approach in German claims data.运用数据驱动的人群细分方法分析德国理赔数据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09620-3.
5
Hospitalization Risk Associated With Emergency Department Reasons for Visit and Patient Age: A Retrospective Evaluation of National Emergency Department Survey Data to Help Identify Potentially Avoidable Emergency Department Visits.与急诊科就诊原因及患者年龄相关的住院风险:对国家急诊科调查数据的回顾性评估,以帮助识别潜在可避免的急诊科就诊情况。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2023 Nov 20;10:23333928231214169. doi: 10.1177/23333928231214169. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Relationship between patient-perceived quality of primary care and self-reported hospital utilisation in China: A cross-sectional study.患者感知的初级保健质量与中国患者自我报告的住院利用之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2308740. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2308740. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
7
Impact Evaluation of a System-Wide Chronic Disease Management Program on Health Service Utilisation: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.一项全系统慢性病管理项目对卫生服务利用影响的评估:一项倾向匹配队列研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 7;13(6):e1002035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002035. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
Can cluster analyses of linked healthcare data identify unique population segments in a general practice-registered population?基于链接的医疗保健数据的聚类分析能否在一般实践注册人群中识别出独特的人群细分?
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08930-z.
9
Health care utilization of patients with acute abdominal pain before and after emergency department visits.急诊就诊前后急性腹痛患者的医疗保健利用情况。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 12;32(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01237-7.
10
Paediatric emergency department utilisation rates and maternal migration status in the Born in Bradford cohort: A cross-sectional study.英国布拉德福德出生队列研究:儿科急诊利用率与产妇移民身份的横断面研究
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 3;17(3):e1003043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003043. eCollection 2020 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases in Germany and Europe - results of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020).德国和欧洲的糖尿病、心血管疾病及慢性呼吸道疾病——欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS 3,2018 - 2020)结果
J Health Monit. 2024 Dec 4;9(4):e12920. doi: 10.25646/12920. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.德国2型糖尿病成年人的医疗保健与健康状况:GEDA 2021/2022糖尿病研究
J Health Monit. 2024 Jun 19;9(2):e12128. doi: 10.25646/12128. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Changing roles of health insurers in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: any lessons to learn from Bismarckian systems?
法国、德国和荷兰健康保险公司角色的转变:能从俾斯麦体系中学到什么经验教训?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2023 Oct;18(4):362-376. doi: 10.1017/S1744133123000191. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、地区和国家 1990 年至 2021 年糖尿病负担,以及对 2050 年患病率的预测:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):203-234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Applying a data-driven population segmentation approach in German claims data.运用数据驱动的人群细分方法分析德国理赔数据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09620-3.
6
[M2Q or Something else? The Impact of Varying Case Selection Criteria on the Prevalence Estimation of Chronic Diseases Based on Outpatient Diagnoses in German Claims Data].[M2Q 还是其他因素?不同病例选择标准对基于德国索赔数据门诊诊断的慢性病患病率估计的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul;86(S 03):S188-S195. doi: 10.1055/a-2052-6477. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
Changes in emergency department utilisation in Germany before and during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, using data from a national surveillance system up to June 2021.德国在 COVID-19 大流行的不同阶段之前和期间急诊科利用情况的变化,使用截至 2021 年 6 月的国家监测系统数据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 2;23(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15375-7.
8
Recording early deaths following emergency department visits in inpatient data: An observational study using data of 16 German hospitals.记录急诊就诊后的早期死亡:使用 16 家德国医院数据的观察性研究。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Apr;177:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.12.003. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
9
Interventions to Prevent Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.干预措施以预防潜在可避免的住院治疗:混合方法系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:898359. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898359. eCollection 2022.
10
Latent Class Cluster Analysis: Selecting the number of clusters.潜在类别聚类分析:选择聚类数量
MethodsX. 2022 May 29;9:101747. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101747. eCollection 2022.