Bailey Aleah, Payton Alexis, Fleming Jonathon, Rager Julia E, Jaspers Ilona
Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma, and Lung Biology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(5):e0323788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323788. eCollection 2025.
The psychosocial and environmental stressors resulting from adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) can result in allostatic load, or 'wear and tear' on the body due to prolonged stress. Allostatic load serves as a useful tool to measure stress- related biological responses that can be integrated into risk assessments. In this study a novel allostatic load measure was used to investigate the relationship between acute stress, stress-related physiological dysregulation and allostatic load (AL) and various demographic variables. Using a small volume of serum collected from 63 participants, we assessed stress biomarkers through ELISA assays and developed a one-sample, semi-automated method for calculating AL scores derived from the Toxicological Prioritization Index (ToxPi) framework. Our analysis employed ordinal regression models to identify the contributions of primary mediators to predicting blood pressure classification, revealing that epinephrine was the most significant predictor of blood pressure, followed by cortisol. Primarily, our results highlight racial disparities in stress loads, in which Black participants had greater secondary mediator scores, and higher AL compared to White participants. Black females and Black non-smokers had higher physiological dysregulation and allostatic load than White participants. Overall, our study presents a novel scoring approach that facilitates the integration of allostatic load measures from a single clinical sample into environmental health research. It also demonstrates the utility of allostatic load in capturing race and sex differences in stress burdens, with important implications for understanding health disparities and improving risk assessments.
由不良健康社会决定因素(SDOH)导致的心理社会和环境应激源会引发体内平衡负荷,即由于长期压力导致身体的“磨损”。体内平衡负荷是一种有用的工具,可用于衡量与压力相关的生物反应,这些反应可纳入风险评估。在本研究中,我们使用了一种新型的体内平衡负荷测量方法来研究急性应激、与压力相关的生理失调和体内平衡负荷(AL)与各种人口统计学变量之间的关系。我们从63名参与者中采集了少量血清,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法评估了应激生物标志物,并开发了一种单样本半自动方法来计算源自毒理学优先排序指数(ToxPi)框架的AL分数。我们的分析采用序数回归模型来确定主要介导因素对预测血压分类的贡献,结果显示肾上腺素是血压的最显著预测因子,其次是皮质醇。主要而言,我们的研究结果凸显了压力负荷方面的种族差异,其中黑人参与者的次要介导因素得分更高,且与白人参与者相比,其体内平衡负荷更高。黑人女性和黑人非吸烟者的生理失调和体内平衡负荷高于白人参与者。总体而言,我们的研究提出了一种新颖的评分方法,有助于将来自单个临床样本的体内平衡负荷测量结果整合到环境卫生研究中。它还证明了体内平衡负荷在捕捉压力负担方面的种族和性别差异方面的效用,这对于理解健康差异和改进风险评估具有重要意义。