Conditioned versus innate effort-based tasks reveal divergence in antidepressant effect on motivational state in male mice.

Antidepressant-induced apathy syndrome is reported in a high number of patients. It is characterised by loss of motivation for daily activities and emotional blunting. It has a negative impact on quality of life and treatment outcome, yet the changes in underlying neurobiology driving this syndrome remain unclear. To begin to address this, a comprehensive understanding of how different classes of antidepressant treatment impact on behaviours relevant to apathy is critical. Rodent motivation for reward is commonly assessed using effort-based operant conditioning paradigms such as the Effort for Reward task. However, motivation to perform spontaneous/innate behaviours may provide additional insight into changes in behaviour reflective of daily activities. We tested the acute and chronic effects of antidepressants on the Effort for Reward task, and the spontaneous/innate Effort-Based Forage task. Acute treatment revealed important divergence in drug effect between tasks, where selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) treatment impaired foraging behaviour in the Effort Based Forage task, but enhanced high-effort, high-value reward responding in the Effort for Reward task. Treatment with a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NRI) or multimodal agent impaired foraging behaviour but did not affect high reward responding in the Effort for Reward task. Conversely, chronic treatment with an SSRI but not SNRI enhanced motivated foraging behaviour but led to a general impairment in Effort for Reward task output. Together, these data demonstrate that SSRI treatment induces opposing effects on conditioned versus innate motivation which may have significant translational relevance when interpreting drug effect. Further, these behavioural effects differ depending on whether antidepressants are acutely or chronically administered.