Özden Samet, Cicek Orhan
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, 44280, Türkiye.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, 67600, Türkiye.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06301-x.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the permanent maxillary first molar rotation (PMMR) angles in cases of maxillary transverse skeletal deficiency (MTSD) and to compare them with a control group.
In this study, which included a total of 88 patients (50 females, 38 males, with a mean age of 14.98 ± 2.14 years), consisting of 66 patients with MTSD and 22 patients in the control group, four groups were divided: Group 1 (MTSD without molar crossbite), Group 2 (MTSD with bilateral molar crossbite), Group 3 (MTSD with unilateral (right-sided) molar crossbite), and Group 4 (Control Group). Skeletal deficiencies were evaluated by measuring the interjugular, jugale right (JR), and jugale left (JL) distances on posteroanterior cephalograms (PACs), while occlusal relationships were assessed using 3-dimensional (3D) intraoral models. PMMR angles were measured using the 3D Slicer software on 3D intraoral models with the Ricketts Molar-Cusp Reference Line and the midsagittal reference plane. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The PMMR angles and JR and JL distances of Group 2 were significantly higher, while the interjugular distance was found to be the lowest (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the PMMR angles between the Control group and Group 1 (p > 0.05), while the JR and JL distances were significantly smaller in the Control group (p < 0.05). In Group 3, on the crossbite side, both the PMMR and the JR and JL distances were significantly higher than on the non-crossbite side (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between PMMR angles and JR and JL distances (p < 0.05).
It was concluded that (i) mesiopalatal PMMRs are observed in the MTSDs with molar crossbite, (ii) molars with normal molar occlusal relationships have normal PMMR angles even in the presence of MTSDs, and (iii) early detection of MTSD enables timely interventions, preventing treatment delays and improving occlusal outcomes, particularly in developing patients, thereby optimizing long-term orthodontic results.
Considering the differences in PMMR angles between MTSD patients with and without molar crossbite, these findings should be taken into account when designing expansion appliances to achieve molar derotation in these patients.
本研究旨在评估上颌横向骨骼发育不足(MTSD)病例中恒上颌第一磨牙旋转(PMMR)角度,并与对照组进行比较。
本研究共纳入88例患者(50例女性,38例男性,平均年龄14.98±2.14岁),其中66例为MTSD患者,22例为对照组。将患者分为四组:第1组(MTSD无磨牙反合)、第2组(MTSD双侧磨牙反合)、第3组(MTSD单侧(右侧)磨牙反合)和第4组(对照组)。通过在头颅后前位片(PACs)上测量颈静脉间、右侧颧突(JR)和左侧颧突(JL)距离来评估骨骼发育不足,同时使用三维(3D)口腔内模型评估咬合关系。使用3D Slicer软件在带有Ricketts磨牙尖参考线和正中矢状参考平面的3D口腔内模型上测量PMMR角度。设定统计学显著性水平为p<0.05。
第2组的PMMR角度以及JR和JL距离显著更高,而颈静脉间距离最低(p<0.05)。对照组和第1组的PMMR角度无显著差异(p>0.05),而对照组的JR和JL距离显著更小(p<0.05)。在第3组中,反合侧的PMMR以及JR和JL距离均显著高于非反合侧(p<0.05)。发现PMMR角度与JR和JL距离之间存在显著正相关(p<0.05)。
得出以下结论:(i)在伴有磨牙反合的MTSD中观察到近中腭向PMMR;(ii)即使存在MTSD,具有正常磨牙咬合关系的磨牙PMMR角度正常;(iii)早期发现MTSD能够及时干预,防止治疗延误并改善咬合结果,尤其是在发育中的患者中,从而优化长期正畸效果。
考虑到有和没有磨牙反合的MTSD患者在PMMR角度上的差异,在设计扩弓矫治器以实现这些患者的磨牙去旋转时应考虑这些发现。