• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨膜下种植体的翼状固位:综述与病例报告

Pterygoid Anchorage of Subperiosteal Implants: An Overview and Case Report.

作者信息

Diss Antoine, Lerebours Augustin, Grébonval Cyrille, Birault Laurine

机构信息

Dentistry, Institut du Sous-Périosté, Nice, FRA.

Dentistry, Biotech Dental, Nice, FRA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85175. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.85175
PMID:40458381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127016/
Abstract

Severely atrophic maxillae (Cawood and Howell Class V-VI) often prevent conventional implant placement in the absence of extensive bone grafting, which carries risks, especially in elderly patients. Modern subperiosteal implants, digitally designed and manufactured in titanium using additive technologies, offer a graftless solution by anchoring the implant to basal bone structures such as the canine pillars and the zygomatic buttress. This case report explores the clinical feasibility of adding pterygoid anchorage to increase subperiosteal implant stability. A 71-year-old edentulous female with extreme maxillary atrophy received two custom subperiosteal implants designed with fixation points in the canine, zygomatic, and pterygoid regions. The digital workflow included cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, digital smile design, and implant modeling with a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS)-gyroid structure to promote osseointegration. The implants were manufactured using Direct Metal Laser Sintering in Ti-6Al-4V ELI titanium and loaded immediately with a provisional titanium-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bridge. Surgical placement included the insertion of bicortical pterygoid screws that penetrated the pterygomaxillary suture, so increasing posterior support and countering the occlusal forces associated with anterior cantilevers. Postoperative results showed excellent implant stability and patient satisfaction. This report confirms that pterygoid anchorage is a viable addition to subperiosteal implant design. It offers improved mechanical stability and expands treatment options for patients with extreme bone loss, without requiring bone grafting. Further biomechanical and long-term studies are recommended to validate these promising findings.

摘要

严重萎缩的上颌骨(Cawood和Howell V - VI级)在没有进行广泛骨移植的情况下通常会妨碍传统种植体的植入,而骨移植存在风险,尤其是在老年患者中。现代骨膜下种植体采用增材技术以钛进行数字化设计和制造,通过将种植体锚固于诸如尖牙支柱和颧突等基骨结构,提供了一种无需植骨的解决方案。本病例报告探讨了增加翼突锚固以提高骨膜下种植体稳定性的临床可行性。一名71岁的无牙女性,上颌极度萎缩,接受了两枚定制的骨膜下种植体,其设计在尖牙、颧骨和翼突区域设有固定点。数字化流程包括锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像、数字化微笑设计以及采用三重周期极小曲面(TPMS)-类甲状腺结构进行种植体建模以促进骨结合。种植体采用直接金属激光烧结技术在Ti-6Al-4V ELI钛中制造,并立即用临时钛增强聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)桥体加载。手术植入包括插入穿透翼上颌缝的双侧皮质翼突螺钉,从而增加后部支撑并抵消与前部悬臂相关的咬合力。术后结果显示种植体稳定性极佳,患者满意度高。本报告证实翼突锚固是骨膜下种植体设计中一种可行的补充。它提供了更好的机械稳定性,并为骨量严重流失的患者扩展了治疗选择,而无需进行骨移植。建议进行进一步的生物力学和长期研究以验证这些有前景的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/889563ce22aa/cureus-0017-00000085175-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/50a7173f8265/cureus-0017-00000085175-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/04358e3dca64/cureus-0017-00000085175-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/9cc74f4f928a/cureus-0017-00000085175-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/7930f863656e/cureus-0017-00000085175-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/dbffab19175d/cureus-0017-00000085175-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/74a44d77a580/cureus-0017-00000085175-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/d795c791a240/cureus-0017-00000085175-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/179842260d5d/cureus-0017-00000085175-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/90dd2e0c4b21/cureus-0017-00000085175-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/10c9994e4617/cureus-0017-00000085175-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/beba5c768a5f/cureus-0017-00000085175-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/0ce3ba3bc0e0/cureus-0017-00000085175-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/ba4d24dc2943/cureus-0017-00000085175-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/5044d24d30a7/cureus-0017-00000085175-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/dd79be188789/cureus-0017-00000085175-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/c9f98f3123c8/cureus-0017-00000085175-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/889563ce22aa/cureus-0017-00000085175-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/50a7173f8265/cureus-0017-00000085175-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/04358e3dca64/cureus-0017-00000085175-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/9cc74f4f928a/cureus-0017-00000085175-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/7930f863656e/cureus-0017-00000085175-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/dbffab19175d/cureus-0017-00000085175-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/74a44d77a580/cureus-0017-00000085175-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/d795c791a240/cureus-0017-00000085175-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/179842260d5d/cureus-0017-00000085175-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/90dd2e0c4b21/cureus-0017-00000085175-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/10c9994e4617/cureus-0017-00000085175-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/beba5c768a5f/cureus-0017-00000085175-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/0ce3ba3bc0e0/cureus-0017-00000085175-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/ba4d24dc2943/cureus-0017-00000085175-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/5044d24d30a7/cureus-0017-00000085175-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/dd79be188789/cureus-0017-00000085175-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/c9f98f3123c8/cureus-0017-00000085175-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/12127016/889563ce22aa/cureus-0017-00000085175-i17.jpg

相似文献

1
Pterygoid Anchorage of Subperiosteal Implants: An Overview and Case Report.骨膜下种植体的翼状固位:综述与病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85175. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Long-term clinical results of additively manufactured subperiosteal implants for the treatment of the severely atrophic maxilla.增材制造的骨膜下植入物治疗严重萎缩上颌骨的长期临床结果。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.04.021.
3
Additively manufactured custom-made subperiosteal implant rehabilitation for severely atrophic maxillary molar area: A technical note.增材制造的定制化骨膜下植入物修复严重萎缩的上颌磨牙区:技术说明。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;125(5S1):101917. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101917. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后4个月结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):11-28.
5
Additively Manufactured Lattice-like Subperiosteal Implants for Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Ridge.增材制造的类骨小梁状骨膜下植入物用于严重萎缩牙槽嵴的修复。
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022 Feb 14;8(2):912-920. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00962. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
6
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):145-161.
7
Computer-assisted implant placement and full-arch immediate loading with digitally prefabricated provisional prostheses without cast: a prospective pilot cohort study.计算机辅助种植体植入和全口即刻负重,采用数字化预制临时义齿,无模型:前瞻性试点队列研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 6;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00369-0.
8
Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.在牙槽骨萎缩的无牙上颌中,标准牙种植体、颧骨种植体和骨膜下种植体的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):347-356. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9987.
9
Mandibular Fixed Prosthesis With a 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Implant: A Case Report.下颌骨固定式修复体与 3D 打印骨膜下植入物:病例报告。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Aug 1;50(4):391-396. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00045.
10
Biomechanical Behavior of Different Distributions of Zygoma and Pterygoid Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.颧骨和翼突种植体不同分布在严重萎缩性上颌后牙区修复中的生物力学行为:三维有限元分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011507.

本文引用的文献

1
Subperiosteal Implants: A Lost Art Worth Revisiting?骨膜下种植体:一门值得重温的失传技艺?
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70025. doi: 10.1111/cid.70025.
2
Five-Year Comparative Study of Zygomatic and Subperiosteal Implants: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Treatment Strategies for Severe Maxillary Atrophy.颧骨种植体与骨膜下种植体的五年对比研究:严重上颌骨萎缩的临床结果、并发症及治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 21;14(3):661. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030661.
3
TPMS-Gyroid Scaffold-Mediated Up-Regulation of ITGB1 for Enhanced Cell Adhesion and Immune-Modulatory Osteogenesis.
TPMS-甲状腺支架介导ITGB1上调以增强细胞黏附及免疫调节性骨生成
Adv Healthc Mater. 2025 Jan 24:e2404768. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202404768.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Pterygoid and Maxillary Tuberosity Implants: A Systematic Review.翼突和上颌结节种植体的临床疗效:一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 3;13(15):4544. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154544.
5
Biocompatibility of Subperiosteal Dental Implants: Changes in the Expression of Osteogenesis-Related Genes in Osteoblasts Exposed to Differently Treated Titanium Surfaces.骨膜下牙种植体的生物相容性:暴露于不同处理钛表面的成骨细胞中骨生成相关基因表达的变化
J Funct Biomater. 2024 May 27;15(6):146. doi: 10.3390/jfb15060146.
6
Additively custom-made 3D-printed subperiosteal implants for the rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla (a case report).用于严重萎缩上颌骨修复的增材定制3D打印骨膜下植入物(病例报告)
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Nov 6;11(11):e8135. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8135. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants.萎缩性无牙牙槽嵴。新一代骨膜下种植体的初步研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;27(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01044-3. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Comparative Bone Graft Evaluation for Dental Implant Success: An Evidence-Based Review.比较用于种植牙成功的骨移植评估:基于证据的综述。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(3):33-44. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021038292.
9
Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes for the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a prospective multicentre one-year follow-up study.上颌骨增材制造的骨膜下颌骨植入物(AMSJI)的患者和临床医生报告的结果:一项前瞻性多中心一年随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;51(2):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis.基于有限元分析的患者特异性骨膜下下颌植入物(AMSJI)的机械评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;51(3):405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 28.