Baek Gyeong Ho, Kim Bo Ri, Shin Jung-Won, Huh Chang Hun, Hwang Jungjoong, Ko Sungmin, Kim Siwon, Ho Pil-Su, Kim Kyu-Han, Park Chun Wook, Seo Seong Jun, Park Chang-Ook, Shin Dongyoon, Kim Yeongshin, Kim Youngsoo, Seong Seung-Yong, Na Jung-Im
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Immunol. 2025 May 19;16:1560447. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560447. eCollection 2025.
Current guidelines to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) overlook disease heterogeneity, limiting personalized care. This study assessed NuGel, a topical GPCR19 agonist, for efficacy, safety, and predictive baseline biomarkers in AD patients.
In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a trial (August 2020-September 2021, five hospitals, 80 participants), patients received placebo, 0.3% NuGel, or 0.5% NuGel twice daily for four weeks.
NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). Treatment with Nu0.5 resulted in a numerically decreased EASI score (-11.9%, [-34.9%, 11.1%], p > 0.05), which is comparable with placebo group (-2.9%, [-21.5%, 15.6%], p > 0.05). No significant difference was observed between groups (p>0.05). Plasma proteomic analysis identified biomarkers associated with blood coagulation, complement activation, and cell adhesion as predictors of response to Nu0.5. Patients with baseline profiles characterized by K2C5, ENTP6, or CRK demonstrated significant clinical improvement when treated with Nu0.5 compared to the placebo group. Among these, the CRK subgroup, comprising 54.3% of the biomarker analysis set, showed a ΔEASI of -61.3% [-99.9, -22.8; p = 0.003] and a ΔIGA of -35.2% [-58.2, -12.1; p = 0.004] compared to the placebo group. The biomarker signature demonstrated high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.92, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the threshold of predicted probability derived from the baseline plasma level of K2C5 and ENTP6 successfully stratified 100% of participants who responded to Nu0.5 (ΔEASI from baseline ≤ -50%), whereas none (0%) in the placebo group responded (p = 0.035).
Baseline biomarkers, such as K2C5, ENTP6, and CRK, may serve as predictors of clinical improvement in AD patients treated with Nu0.5, highlighting the potential for personalized treatment strategies. Further research is required to validate these findings in larger patient cohorts.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04530643.
目前治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的指南忽视了疾病的异质性,限制了个性化治疗。本研究评估了局部用GPCR19激动剂NuGel在AD患者中的疗效、安全性及预测性基线生物标志物。
在一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的2a期试验(2020年8月至2021年9月,五家医院,80名参与者)中,患者每日两次接受安慰剂、0.3% NuGel或0.5% NuGel治疗,为期四周。
NuGel(0.3%[Nu0.3]和0.5%[Nu0.5])耐受性良好,未出现药物不良反应或严重不良事件。Nu0.3的湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分较基线显著降低(-12.2%,[-30.3%,5.9%],p = 0.04)。Nu0.5治疗使EASI评分在数值上有所降低(-11.9%,[-34.9%,11.1%],p>0.05),与安慰剂组(-2.9%,[-21.5%,15.6%],p>0.05)相当。组间未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。血浆蛋白质组学分析确定与凝血、补体激活和细胞黏附相关的生物标志物可作为对Nu0.5反应的预测指标。与安慰剂组相比,基线特征为K2C5、ENTP6或CRK的患者在接受Nu0.5治疗后临床改善显著。其中,占生物标志物分析集54.3%的CRK亚组与安慰剂组相比,EASI变化值为-61.3%[-99.9,-22.8;p = 0.003],免疫球蛋白A(IGA)变化值为-35.2%[-58.2,-12.1;p = 0.004]。生物标志物特征显示出较高的预测准确性(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.92,p = 0.002)。逻辑回归分析显示,根据K2C5和ENTP6的基线血浆水平得出的预测概率阈值成功地将所有对Nu0.5有反应(EASI较基线变化值≤-50%)的参与者进行了分层,而安慰剂组中无一人有反应(0%)(p = 0.035)。
K2C5、ENTP6和CRK等基线生物标志物可作为接受Nu0.5治疗的AD患者临床改善的预测指标,凸显了个性化治疗策略的潜力。需要进一步研究以在更大的患者队列中验证这些发现。