Chai Yaxin, Niu Yongchao, Cheng Ruixue, Liang Pan, Gao Jianbo
Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 May 19;15:1403890. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1403890. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the application of amide proton transfer (APT)-weighted MRI, T1 mapping in evaluating the preoperative high-risk histopathologic phenotypes of rectal adenocarcinoma and their correlation with Ki-67 expression.
Retrospective collection of 178 confirmed cases of rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers (center 1: 97 cases, center 2: 81 cases). High-resolution T2WI, APT, T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and Ki-67 staining were performed in all patients. The measured parameters included APT signal intensity (APT SI), T1 relaxation time before (native T1) and after (post-contrast T1) enhancement, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic efficiency, and Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between parameters with Ki-67, respectively.
APT SI values were significantly different between the mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) group and the common adenocarcinoma (AC) group in two centers (center 1: [2.64 ± 0.33%] vs. [2.22 ± 0.78%], <0.05), (center 2: [3.27 ± 0.80%] vs. [2.59 ± 0.77%], <0.05). In the AC group, APT SI, native T1 and ADC values were significantly different between T1-2 and T3-4 groups (center 1: [2.58 ± 0.69%] vs. [1.61 ± 0.49%], [1540 ± 150 ms] vs. [1360 ± 130 ms], [0.85 ± 0.15×10 mm/s] vs. [0.99± 0.15×10 mm/s], respectively, all <0.05), the results were consistent with the findings of center 2. APT SI and native T1 values in the lymph node metastasis group were higher than those in the non-metastatic group (center 1: [2.49 ± 0.77%] vs. [2.07 ± 0.74%], [1540 ± 170 ms] vs. [1430 ± 160 ms], respectively, all <0.05), the result were consistent with the findings of center 2. APT SI were statistically significant in evaluating lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in two centers (<0.05). Ki-67 expression was correlated with APT SI (mild to medium), ADC (mild) and native T1 (mild to high) in two centers, respectively (<0.05), but there was no correlation between post-contrast T1 and Ki-67 (>0.05).
APT and T1 mapping can be used to evaluate the preoperative pathological classification, TN staging, and structural invasion of rectal adenocarcinoma, which has the potential to become an imaging marker for the evaluation of high-risk histopathologic phenotypes and Ki-67 expression of rectal adenocarcinoma.
探讨酰胺质子转移(APT)加权磁共振成像、T1 图谱在评估直肠腺癌术前高危组织病理学表型及其与 Ki-67 表达相关性中的应用。
回顾性收集来自两个中心的 178 例确诊直肠腺癌病例(中心 1:97 例,中心 2:81 例)。对所有患者进行高分辨率 T2WI、APT、T1 图谱、扩散加权成像(DWI)及 Ki-67 染色。测量参数包括 APT 信号强度(APT SI)、增强前(固有 T1)及增强后(增强后 T1)的 T1 弛豫时间和表观扩散系数(ADC)。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断效能,分别采用 Spearman 相关性分析评估各参数与 Ki-67 的相关性。
两个中心的黏液腺癌(MC)组与普通腺癌(AC)组的 APT SI 值差异有统计学意义(中心 1:[2.64±0.33%] 对 [2.22±0.78%],<0.05),(中心 2:[3.27±0.80%] 对 [2.59±0.77%],<0.05)。在 AC 组中,T1-2 组与 T3-4 组的 APT SI、固有 T1 和 ADC 值差异有统计学意义(中心 1:分别为 [2.58±0.69%] 对 [1.61±0.49%],[1540±150 ms] 对 [1360±130 ms],[0.85±0.15×10⁻³mm²/s] 对 [0.99±0.15×10⁻³mm²/s],均 <0.05),结果与中心 2 一致。淋巴结转移组的 APT SI 和固有 T1 值高于无转移组(中心 1:分别为 [2.49±0.77%] 对 [2.07±0.74%],[1540±170 ms] 对 [1430±160 ms],均 <0.05),结果与中心 2 一致。两个中心中 APT SI 在评估淋巴管侵犯(LVI)和壁外血管侵犯(EMVI)方面差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两个中心中 Ki-67 表达分别与 APT SI(轻度至中度)、ADC(轻度)和固有 T1(轻度至高度)相关(<0.05),但增强后 T1 与 Ki-67 无相关性(>0.05)。
APT 和 T1 图谱可用于评估直肠腺癌的术前病理分类、TN 分期及结构侵犯,有潜力成为评估直肠腺癌高危组织病理学表型及 Ki-67 表达的影像学标志物。