Matkar Abhay
District Mental Health Program, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Dept. of Psychiatry, SSIMS and RC, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 May;47(3):238-245. doi: 10.1177/02537176241240096. Epub 2024 May 5.
Suicide is a significant public health issue, yet it can be avoided with prompt, evidence-based, and frequently inexpensive interventions. There are distinctions between the profiles of impulsive suicide attempters (ISA) and non-impulsive suicide attempters (NISA), and a significant number of suicide attempts are impulsive. A thorough multisectoral suicide prevention strategy is necessary for an effective national response.
This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare center in Karnataka. Sixty inpatients above the age of 18 years with an alleged history of suicide attempts were enrolled in the study. Their stressful life events in the past year were assessed using the Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES). Impulsive and non-impulsive attempters were considered based on the time gap between the suicidal ideation and the suicidal attempt with the presence or absence of plans regarding the act. They were compared using appropriate inferential statistical tests.
The majority of the suicide attempts were impulsive (63.3%). The ISA and NISA did not differ in socio-demographic characteristics except for age and family type, with impulsive attempters being more common at younger ages than the non-impulsive attempters ( = .02). The majority of ISA were from joint families (44.7%), while 72.7% of NISA were from nuclear households ( = .04). Compared to ISA, NISA recollected a higher number of stressors.
The ISA and NISA differ in aspects of age, family type, and stressors. Characteristic distinctions between ISA and NISA should be recognized and understood in order to design policies for suicide prevention and minimize morbidity and mortality. Exploring and addressing the stressors and helping patients to overcome them through better coping skills helps in suicide prevention.
自杀是一个重大的公共卫生问题,但通过及时、基于证据且通常成本低廉的干预措施可以避免。冲动性自杀未遂者(ISA)和非冲动性自杀未遂者(NISA)的特征存在差异,且大量自杀未遂行为是冲动性的。全面的多部门自杀预防策略对于有效的国家应对措施至关重要。
这项观察性横断面研究在卡纳塔克邦的一家三级医疗中心进行。60名年龄在18岁以上且有自杀未遂史的住院患者被纳入研究。使用推定应激性生活事件量表(PSLES)评估他们在过去一年中的应激性生活事件。根据自杀意念与自杀未遂之间的时间间隔以及是否存在关于该行为的计划来区分冲动性和非冲动性未遂者。使用适当的推断性统计检验对他们进行比较。
大多数自杀未遂行为是冲动性的(63.3%)。ISA和NISA在社会人口统计学特征方面除年龄和家庭类型外没有差异,冲动性未遂者在较年轻年龄段比非冲动性未遂者更常见(P = 0.02)。大多数ISA来自大家庭(44.7%),而72.7%的NISA来自核心家庭(P = 0.04)。与ISA相比,NISA回忆起的应激源数量更多。
ISA和NISA在年龄、家庭类型和应激源方面存在差异。应认识和理解ISA和NISA之间的特征差异,以便制定自杀预防政策并将发病率和死亡率降至最低。探索并解决应激源,通过更好的应对技巧帮助患者克服这些应激源,有助于预防自杀。