Tzanetakos Charalampos, Kokkinaki Ioanna, Barmpouni Myrto, Kossyvaki Vasiliki, Psarra Marina, Perdrizet Johnna, Gourzoulidis George
HTA, Value & Evidence, Health Through Evidence, Athens, Greece.
Access and Value, Pfizer Hellas, Athens, Greece.
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2025 Dec;24(1):486-498. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2515596. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) compared to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) for prevention of pneumococcal disease in the pediatric population in Greece.
A published decision-analytic Markov model was adapted from payer perspective, to compare PCV20 (under a 3 + 1 dosing schedule per EMA approval) with PCV13 and PCV15 (both under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule) over a 10-year time horizon. Inputs for epidemiology, serotype coverage, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (€2024) were sourced from published literature and official data. Model outcomes included number of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), noninvasive hospitalized pneumonia, non-hospitalized pneumonia and otitis media (OM) cases, attributable deaths, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each vaccination strategy and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each comparison. Scenario analyses assessed PCV20 in a 2 + 1 schedule per recent national recommendations.
The analysis indicated that, vaccination with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15 prevents an additional 1,953 and 1,514 cases of IPD 54,956 and 42,069 noninvasive hospitalized and non-hospitalized pneumonia cases, 343,353 and 271,864 OM cases and 1,377 and 987 deaths respectively, resulting in incremental gain of 23,065 (vs PCV13) and 17,118 (vs PCV15) QALYs respectively. The lower number of pneumococcal disease cases with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15, translated to a reduction in total medical care cost of €249 M vs PCV13 and €192 M vs PCV15 over the modeled time horizon. Scenario analyses showed that PCV20 remained dominant under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule.
Vaccination with PCV20, whether in a 2 + 1 or a 3 + 1 schedule, was estimated to be a dominant vaccination strategy over PCV15 or PCV13 for the prevention of pneumococcal disease in Greek infants, as expansion of serotype coverage prevents additional morbidity and costs.
本研究旨在评估20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20)与13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13)和15价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV15)相比,在希腊儿童人群中预防肺炎球菌疾病的成本效益。
从支付方角度对已发表的决策分析马尔可夫模型进行调整,以比较PCV20(根据欧洲药品管理局批准采用3+1接种程序)与PCV13和PCV15(均采用2+1接种程序)在10年时间范围内的情况。流行病学、血清型覆盖率、疫苗效力、效用和直接医疗成本(2024欧元)的输入数据来自已发表的文献和官方数据。模型结果包括侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病(IPD)病例数、非侵袭性住院肺炎病例数、非住院肺炎病例数和中耳炎(OM)病例数、归因死亡数、成本、每种疫苗接种策略的质量调整生命年(QALY)以及每次比较的增量成本效益比。情景分析评估了根据近期国家建议采用2+1接种程序的PCV20。
分析表明,与PCV13和PCV15相比,接种PCV20分别可额外预防1953例和1514例IPD、54956例和42069例非侵袭性住院和非住院肺炎病例、343353例和271864例OM病例以及1377例和987例死亡,分别导致QALY增量23065(与PCV13相比)和17118(与PCV15相比)。与PCV13和PCV15相比,PCV20导致的肺炎球菌疾病病例数更少,在模拟的时间范围内,与PCV13相比,总医疗费用降低了2.49亿欧元,与PCV15相比降低了1.92亿欧元。情景分析表明,在2+1接种程序下,PCV20仍然占主导地位。
无论是采用2+1还是3+1接种程序,接种PCV20被估计是希腊婴儿预防肺炎球菌疾病优于PCV15或PCV13的主导疫苗接种策略,因为血清型覆盖率的扩大可预防更多的发病情况并降低成本。