Suppr超能文献

浸泡性低温后无线电波区域热疗与腹腔灌洗复温的对照比较。

Controlled comparison of radio wave regional hyperthermia and peritoneal lavage rewarming after immersion hypothermia.

作者信息

White J D, Butterfield A B, Greer K A, Schoem S, Johnson C, Holloway R R

出版信息

J Trauma. 1985 Oct;25(10):989-93. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198510000-00011.

Abstract

Anesthetized random source dogs were cooled by ice-water immersion to a stable core temperature of 25 degrees C and subsequently rewarmed with normal saline peritoneal lavage (43 degrees C, 175 ml/kg/hr) or radio frequency electromagnetic-induced regional hyperthermia (4-6 watts/kg). The mean time required for core rewarming to 30 degrees C was 183 +/- 79 minutes for lavage and 58 +/- 13 minutes for radio wave therapy (p less than 0.01). There was no evidence of tissue damage with either modality. These data suggest radio wave regional hyperthermia is superior to peritoneal lavage for core rewarming of rapidly induced immersion hypothermia.

摘要

将麻醉后的随机来源犬只通过冰水浸泡冷却至稳定的核心体温25摄氏度,随后用生理盐水腹腔灌洗(43摄氏度,175毫升/千克/小时)或射频电磁诱导局部热疗(4 - 6瓦/千克)进行复温。腹腔灌洗使核心体温复温至30摄氏度所需的平均时间为183 ± 79分钟,射频波治疗为58 ± 13分钟(p < 0.01)。两种方式均未出现组织损伤的迹象。这些数据表明,对于快速诱导的浸泡性低温,射频波局部热疗在核心体温复温方面优于腹腔灌洗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验