Suppr超能文献

射频区域热疗与温热湿化吸入复温的比较。

Comparison of rewarming by radio wave regional hyperthermia and warm humidified inhalation.

作者信息

White J D, Butterfield A B, Greer K A, Schoem S, Johnson C, Holloway R R

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 Dec;55(12):1103-6.

PMID:6517815
Abstract

Anesthetized random source dogs were cooled by ice water immersion to a stable core temperature of 25 degrees C and subsequently rewarmed with warm humidified inhalation (43 degrees C, 450 cc of min ventilation X kg-1) or radio-frequency induction hyperthermia (4-6 watts X kg-1). The mean time required for core rewarming to 30 degrees C was 280 +/- 114 min for ventilation and 58 +/- 13 min for radio wave therapy (p less than 0.001). There was no evidence of tissue damage with either modality. These data suggest radio wave heating is superior to warm humidified inhalation therapy for core rewarming of rapidly induced immersion hypothermia.

摘要

将麻醉后的随机来源犬只通过冰水浸泡冷却至稳定的核心体温25摄氏度,随后用温热湿化吸入(43摄氏度,每分钟通气量450毫升×千克-1)或射频感应热疗(4 - 6瓦×千克-1)进行复温。核心体温复温至30摄氏度所需的平均时间,通气复温为280±114分钟,射频波治疗为58±13分钟(p<0.001)。两种方式均未发现组织损伤迹象。这些数据表明,对于快速诱导的浸泡性低温的核心复温,射频波加热优于温热湿化吸入疗法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验