• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Central Nervous System Polypharmacy Among People Living With Dementia.痴呆症患者的中枢神经系统多重用药情况
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Aug;26(8):105708. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105708. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Impact of eliciting treatment priorities on analgesic prescribing in older patients with high levels of polypharmacy.引出治疗优先级对多重用药老年患者镇痛药物处方的影响。
Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf056.
4
Pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing for people living with dementia and polypharmacy in primary care: A pilot study.药剂师主导的远程医疗减药用于初级保健中患有痴呆症和多种药物治疗的人群:一项试点研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):1973-1984. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18867. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
6
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.
7
Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial.哌甲酯与安慰剂治疗晚期癌症患者疲劳的疗效比较:MePFAC随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(36):1-47. doi: 10.3310/GJPS6321.
8
Folic acid with or without vitamin B12 for cognition and dementia.叶酸联合或不联合维生素B12对认知及痴呆的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD004514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004514.
9
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
10
Pharmacist-led deprescribing to improve medication safety in older patients with hip fractures.由药剂师主导的减药方案以提高老年髋部骨折患者的用药安全性。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06250-8.

本文引用的文献

1
American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.美国老年医学学会 2023 年更新了老年人潜在不适当药物使用的 AGS Beers 标准®。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2052-2081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18372. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Efficacy of interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施减少慢性非癌痛长期阿片类药物治疗的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 4;377:e066375. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066375.
3
Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians: The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.认知障碍患者和初级保健临床医生的减药教育与常规护理的比较:OPTIMIZE 实用聚类随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 May 1;182(5):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0502.
4
Prevalence of Central Nervous System-Active Polypharmacy Among Older Adults With Dementia in the US.美国老年痴呆症患者中枢神经系统活性药物联合使用的流行率。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):952-961. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1195.
5
Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.针对社区居住老年人的减药治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3323-3332. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06089-2. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
The OPTIMIZE patient- and family-centered, primary care-based deprescribing intervention for older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.OPTIMIZE 患者和家属为中心、基于初级保健的老年痴呆或轻度认知障碍和多种慢性病患者药物减量干预方案:一项实用型群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 18;21(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04482-0.
7
Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.阿片类药物长期用于慢性非癌性疼痛的相关不良事件:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2.
8
Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.加巴喷丁类药物用于慢性下腰痛的获益与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Deprescribing: A narrative review of the evidence and practical recommendations for recognizing opportunities and taking action.减药:关于识别机会并采取行动的证据及实用建议的叙述性综述
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Mar;38:3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.美国老年医学会2015年更新的《老年人潜在不适当用药的Beers标准》
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

痴呆症患者的中枢神经系统多重用药情况

Central Nervous System Polypharmacy Among People Living With Dementia.

作者信息

Bayliss Elizabeth A, Powers J David, Weffald Linda A, Rasmussen Jon R, Pieper Lisa E, Maiyani Mahesh, Norton Jonathan, Green Ariel R, Sheehan Orla C, Boyd Cynthia M

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Aug;26(8):105708. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105708. Epub 2025 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105708
PMID:40460892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12312378/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Polypharmacy-CNS (Poly-CNS) quality metric identifies individuals taking multiple medications with central nervous system side effects. The Poly-CNS measure may reduce risky prescribing for persons living with dementia (PLWD).

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the Optimize cluster randomized pragmatic trial of deprescribing education in primary care conducted between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Two overlapping cohorts of PLWD taking 5+ chronic medications. The "full intervention" cohort was randomized at the clinic level to receive patient and clinician deprescribing education materials. The "clinician education cohort" included additional individuals whose clinicians received educational materials but who did not receive patient materials.

METHODS

Description of individuals meeting Poly-CNS criteria based on pharmacy dispensing records and their highest frequency combinations of medications. Generalized linear mixed models compared the odds of meeting Poly-CNS criteria by intervention or control group and modeled associations between patient characteristics and CNS polypharmacy at any time. Longitudinal analysis using generalized linear mixed models assessed trends of meeting Poly-CNS criteria over time.

RESULTS

The proportion meeting Poly-CNS criteria at any time during the observation period in the full intervention cohort (N = 2908) was 12.3% and 10.8% in the clinician education cohort (N = 5226). Adjusted P value for trend over time in the combined full intervention cohort was .0587, and <.0001 in the clinician education cohort. There was no effect of the intervention on odds of meeting Poly-CNS criteria in either cohort. Characteristics in both cohorts independently associated with meeting Poly-CNS criteria were younger age, greater morbidity burden, and female sex plus hospice use at baseline in the full intervention cohort. The most commonly combined medications were opioids plus antidepressants plus gabapentin.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Individuals with cognitive limitations and multimorbidity pharmacologically treated for mood and/or pain symptoms may be at risk for CNS polypharmacy.

摘要

目的

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的多重用药 - 中枢神经系统(Poly - CNS)质量指标用于识别服用多种具有中枢神经系统副作用药物的个体。Poly - CNS指标可能会减少对痴呆症患者(PLWD)的高风险处方。

设计

对2019年4月1日至2020年3月31日期间在初级保健中进行的撤药教育优化整群随机实用试验进行二次分析。

设置与参与者

两个重叠的服用5种及以上慢性药物的PLWD队列。“全面干预”队列在诊所层面随机分组,以接受患者和临床医生的撤药教育材料。“临床医生教育队列”包括另外一些个体,他们的临床医生收到了教育材料,但他们自己没有收到患者材料。

方法

根据药房配药记录描述符合Poly - CNS标准的个体及其最高频率的药物组合。广义线性混合模型比较了干预组或对照组符合Poly - CNS标准的几率,并对患者特征与任何时候的中枢神经系统多重用药之间的关联进行建模。使用广义线性混合模型的纵向分析评估了随时间符合Poly - CNS标准的趋势。

结果

在全面干预队列(N = 2908)中,观察期内任何时间符合Poly - CNS标准的比例为12.3%,在临床医生教育队列(N = 5226)中为10.8%。在合并的全面干预队列中,随时间变化趋势的调整P值为0.0587,在临床医生教育队列中为<0.0001。干预对两个队列中符合Poly - CNS标准的几率均无影响。两个队列中与符合Poly - CNS标准独立相关的特征包括年龄较小、发病率负担较重,以及在全面干预队列中基线时为女性且使用临终关怀服务。最常联合使用的药物是阿片类药物加抗抑郁药加加巴喷丁。

结论与启示

因情绪和/或疼痛症状接受药物治疗的认知受限和患有多种疾病的个体可能存在中枢神经系统多重用药风险。