Guo Ziqi, Felag Jack, Rozum Jordan C, Correia Rion Brattig, Wang Xuan, Rocha Luis M
School of Systems Science & Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
School of Systems Science & Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA; School of Informatics, Computing & Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Aug;168:104847. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104847. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
Social media data allows researchers to construct large digital cohorts - groups of users who post health-related content - to study the interplay between human behavior and medical treatment. Identifying the users most relevant to a specific health problem is, however, a challenge in that social media sites vary in the generality of their discourse. While X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and Facebook cater to wide ranging topics, Reddit subgroups and dedicated patient advocacy forums trade in much more specific, biomedically-relevant discourse. To filter relevant users on any social media, we have developed a general method and tested it on epilepsy discourse. We analyzed the text from posts by users who mention epilepsy drugs at least once in the general-purpose social media sites X and Instagram, the epilepsy-focused Reddit subgroup (r/Epilepsy), and the Epilepsy Foundation of America (EFA) forums. We used a curated medical terminology dictionary to generate a knowledge graph (KG) from each social media site, whereby nodes represent terms, and edge weights denote the strength of association between pairs of terms in the collected text. Our method is based on computing the metric backbone of each KG, which yields the (sparsified) subgraph of edges that participate in shortest paths. By comparing the subset of users who contribute to the backbone to the subset who do not, we show that epilepsy-focused social media users contribute to the KG backbone in much higher proportion than do general-purpose social media users. Furthermore, using human annotation of Instagram posts, we demonstrate that users who do not contribute to the backbone are much more likely to use dictionary terms in a manner inconsistent with their biomedical meaning and are rightly excluded from the cohort of interest. Our metric backbone approach, thus, has several benefits: it yields focused user cohorts who engage in discourse relevant to a targeted biomedical problem; unlike engagement-based approaches, it can retain low-engagement users who nonetheless contribute meaningful biomedical insights and filter out very vocal users who contribute no relevant content, it is parameter-free, algebraically principled, does not require classifiers or human-curation, and is simple to compute with the open-source code we provide.
社交媒体数据使研究人员能够构建大型数字队列——即发布与健康相关内容的用户群体——以研究人类行为与医学治疗之间的相互作用。然而,识别与特定健康问题最相关的用户是一项挑战,因为社交媒体网站的讨论范围各不相同。虽然X(前身为推特)、照片墙和脸书涉及广泛的话题,但红迪网子版块和专门的患者宣传论坛的讨论则更具体,与生物医学相关。为了在任何社交媒体上筛选出相关用户,我们开发了一种通用方法,并在癫痫相关讨论中对其进行了测试。我们分析了在通用社交媒体网站X和照片墙、专注于癫痫的红迪网子版块(r/Epilepsy)以及美国癫痫基金会(EFA)论坛中至少提及一次癫痫药物的用户所发布帖子的文本。我们使用一个精心策划的医学术语词典从每个社交媒体网站生成一个知识图谱(KG),其中节点代表术语,边权重表示收集到的文本中术语对之间的关联强度。我们的方法基于计算每个知识图谱的度量骨干,它产生参与最短路径的边的(稀疏化)子图。通过比较对骨干有贡献的用户子集和没有贡献的用户子集,我们发现专注于癫痫的社交媒体用户对知识图谱骨干的贡献比例远高于通用社交媒体用户。此外,通过对照片墙帖子进行人工标注,我们证明了对骨干没有贡献的用户更有可能以与其生物医学意义不一致的方式使用词典术语,因此被正确地排除在感兴趣的队列之外。因此,我们的度量骨干方法有几个优点:它产生专注于与目标生物医学问题相关讨论的用户队列;与基于参与度的方法不同,它可以保留那些虽参与度低但仍能提供有意义生物医学见解的用户,并过滤掉那些不提供相关内容但非常活跃的用户,它是无参数的,有代数原理,不需要分类器或人工策划,并且使用我们提供的开源代码很容易计算。