Suppr超能文献

比较静脉探测技术与传统静脉穿刺对早产儿疼痛及行为状态的影响:一项准实验研究。

Comparing the effects of vein finder technology and traditional venipuncture on pain and behavioural states in preterm infants: a quasi-experimental study.

作者信息

Sayed Salwa, Abdel Sadek Basma Rabea, El Said Rasha Rady

机构信息

PhD(c), Pediatric Nursing department, Faculty of Nursing, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Pediatric Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Benha university, Benha, Egypt.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jun 3;9(1):e003425. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003425.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preterm infants frequently undergo venipuncture, causing pain and distress. Traditional methods rely on clinical expertise, often leading to multiple attempts and prolonged procedures. Vein finder technology aims to improve success rates and reduce discomfort, yet its effects on pain perception and behavioural states in preterm infants remain underexplored.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the effects of using a vein finder versus the traditional venipuncture method on pain perception and behavioural responses among preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in two governmental hospitals in Egypt, involving 124 preterm infants (62 in the vein finder group and 62 in the traditional method group). A pre-designed questionnaire was used to collect demographic and clinical data. Pain and behavioural responses were assessed using two validated tools: the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) and the Neonatal Behavioural State Scale. Data were collected over a 6-month period from March 2024 to August 2024.

RESULTS

The vein finder group had significantly lower pain scores (mean NIPS score: 5.75±1.11 vs 6.83±1.35; mean difference: -1.08, p<0.01) and shorter crying durations (mean: 2.94±0.25 min vs 5.61±1.10 min; p<0.01). Behavioural states improved, with longer durations in deep sleep (15.36±3.12 min vs 4.57±1.65 min) and reduced active alert states (4.30±1.74 min vs 10.95±3.28 min; p<0.01). First-attempt success rates were higher (87.1% vs 46.8%), and fewer complications (eg, phlebitis, infiltration) were reported in the vein finder group.

CONCLUSION

The use of vein finder technology may significantly reduce pain, improve behavioural states and enhance procedural success in preterm infants compared with traditional venipuncture methods. These findings suggest that incorporating this technology into NICUs practice might benefit patient comfort and clinical efficiency.

摘要

引言

早产儿经常需要进行静脉穿刺,这会带来疼痛和痛苦。传统方法依赖临床经验,常常导致多次尝试和操作时间延长。静脉探测仪技术旨在提高成功率并减轻不适感,但其对早产儿疼痛感知和行为状态的影响仍未得到充分研究。

目的

本研究旨在比较在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中,使用静脉探测仪与传统静脉穿刺方法对早产儿疼痛感知和行为反应的影响。

方法

在埃及的两家公立医院进行了一项准实验研究,涉及124名早产儿(静脉探测仪组62名,传统方法组62名)。使用预先设计的问卷收集人口统计学和临床数据。使用两种经过验证的工具评估疼痛和行为反应:新生儿疼痛量表(NIPS)和新生儿行为状态量表。数据收集时间为2024年3月至2024年8月的6个月期间。

结果

静脉探测仪组的疼痛评分显著更低(平均NIPS评分:5.75±1.11 vs 6.83±1.35;平均差异:-1.08,p<0.01),哭闹持续时间更短(平均:2.94±0.25分钟 vs 5.61±1.10分钟;p<0.01)。行为状态得到改善,深睡眠持续时间更长(15.36±3.12分钟 vs 4.57±1.65分钟),活跃警觉状态减少(4.30±1.74分钟 vs 10.95±3.28分钟;p<0.01)。首次尝试成功率更高(87.1% vs 46.8%),静脉探测仪组报告的并发症(如静脉炎、渗漏)更少。

结论

与传统静脉穿刺方法相比,使用静脉探测仪技术可能显著减轻早产儿的疼痛,改善行为状态并提高操作成功率。这些发现表明,将该技术纳入NICU的实践可能有益于患者舒适度和临床效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ae/12142009/a4d5038605c8/bmjpo-9-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验