Enger Martine, Schmidt Malte, Nordsletten Lars, Moosmayer Stefan, Pripp Are Hugo, Melhuus Knut, Brox Jens Ivar
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4959 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 3;26(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08754-1.
Rotator cuff tears may easily be missed in patients with acute shoulder trauma. The evidence in support of shoulder physical examination tests has been considered insufficient in reviews and meta-analyses. The purpose of this study was to explore whether physical examination tests can effectively predict or rule out acute full-thickness rotator cuff tears in soft tissue shoulder injuries in emergency departments and primary health care.
In a combined primary care walk-in clinic and secondary care orthopaedic emergency department, 120 consecutive patients aged ≥ 40 years with acute shoulder injury without fracture on plain x-rays were enrolled prospectively at the first follow-up within three weeks of the injury. Thirteen physical examination tests and ultrasound screening as reference standard, were performed blinded to each other.
The median age was 55 years, 51% were female. The prevalence of the target condition rotator cuff full-thickness tear and/or occult fracture of the insertion was 38% (n = 46; 38 tears and 8 occult avulsion fractures). Almost all tears involved the supraspinatus tendon (n = 36). The highest test accuracy was observed for the inability to abduct above 90°, resisted abduction pain and external rotation strength. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of the inability to abduct the arm above 90 ° was 84% (95% CI 69-93), 71% (95% CI 59-82) and 12.9 (95% CI 4.8-34.2), respectively, and 66% (51-80), 86% (77-93) and 12.4 (5.0-30.8) for external rotation strength assessed by the small finger test. Combining the inability to abduct above 90° and weakness in external rotation improved the sensitivity to above 90% and the diagnostic odds ratio to above 22, but specificity decreased.
The present study suggests that two simple tests, the inability to abduct above 90° and weakness in external rotation may effectively predict full-thickness tears of the supra- and infraspinatus and/or occult fracture at their insertion in the acute phase of soft tissue shoulder injuries. The test combination may be useful for selecting patients for advanced imaging and for diagnostic purposes when such imaging is not available.
The Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee South East (2015/195) on 24th March 2015, and retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02644564) on 31st December 2015.
急性肩部创伤患者的肩袖撕裂很容易被漏诊。在综述和荟萃分析中,支持肩部体格检查的证据被认为不足。本研究的目的是探讨体格检查能否有效预测或排除急诊科和基层医疗中软组织肩部损伤的急性全层肩袖撕裂。
在一家基层医疗随诊诊所和一家二级医疗骨科急诊科联合进行的研究中,前瞻性纳入了120例年龄≥40岁、急性肩部损伤且X线平片无骨折的患者,在受伤后三周内的首次随访时进行研究。13项体格检查和超声筛查作为参考标准相互独立进行。
中位年龄为55岁,51%为女性。目标疾病肩袖全层撕裂和/或止点隐匿性骨折的患病率为38%(n = 46;38例撕裂和8例隐匿性撕脱骨折)。几乎所有撕裂都累及冈上肌腱(n = 36)。外展不能超过90°、抗阻外展疼痛和外旋力量测试的准确性最高。外展手臂不能超过90°的敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比分别为84%(95%CI 69 - 93)、71%(95%CI 59 - 82)和12.9(95%CI 4.8 - 34.2),用小指试验评估外旋力量时分别为66%(51 - 80)、86%(77 - 93)和12.4(5.0 - 30.8)。将外展不能超过90°和外旋无力相结合可将敏感性提高到90%以上,诊断比值比提高到22以上,但特异性降低。
本研究表明,外展不能超过90°和外旋无力这两项简单检查可有效预测肩部软组织损伤急性期冈上肌和冈下肌的全层撕裂和/或其止点的隐匿性骨折。该检查组合对于选择进行高级影像学检查的患者以及在无法进行此类影像学检查时用于诊断目的可能有用。
挪威东南部地区伦理委员会(2015/195)于2015年3月24日批准,于2015年12月31日在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行回顾性注册(NCT02644564)。