Haarms Ron, Jongsma Hannah E, Geraets Chris N W, Veling Wim
https://ror.org/03cv38k47University Centre for Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry Veldzicht, Balkbrug, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2025 Jun 4;55:e165. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725001230.
Insight in nonverbal correlates of paranoid ideation can potentially help improve diagnostic procedures and guide interventions. The aim was to systematically evaluate the scientific evidence investigating nonverbal correlates of paranoid ideation.
The review follows the PRISMA guidelines. Databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cinahl were searched for studies concerning the use of standardized instruments for both verbal and nonverbal measurements of paranoid ideation in adult participants. Quality of studies was evaluated using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. Data were systematically extracted and summarized thematically and narratively. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022288001).
The search strategy yielded 3962 results of which 22 papers met inclusion criteria. Half ( = 11) of the included articles included patients with a diagnosis on the psychosis spectrum, the other articles ( = 11) studied healthy populations. Identified nonverbal categories were ( = 6) ( = 5) ( = 5) ( = 4) ( = 3), and ( = 1). Some studies investigated multiple nonverbal categories.
Evidence was strongest for spatial behavior and brain region activity as nonverbal correlates of paranoid ideation. Evidence for stress physiology, information processing, and aggression as potential nonverbal correlates was less robust, due to inconsistent findings and small numbers of publications. Using nonverbal methods to assess paranoid ideation requires more investigation and evaluation. The integration of nonverbal assessments might offer new diagnostic possibilities that move beyond traditional verbal methods.
深入了解偏执观念的非语言关联可能有助于改进诊断程序并指导干预措施。本研究旨在系统评估调查偏执观念非语言关联的科学证据。
本综述遵循PRISMA指南。在PsycINFO、PubMed、Web of Science和Cinahl数据库中检索有关使用标准化工具对成年参与者偏执观念进行言语和非言语测量的研究。使用有效公共卫生实践项目工具评估研究质量。系统提取数据并进行主题和叙述性总结。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42022288001)注册。
检索策略产生了3962条结果,其中22篇论文符合纳入标准。纳入的文章中有一半(n = 11)纳入了患有精神病谱系诊断的患者,其他文章(n = 11)研究了健康人群。确定的非语言类别有眼神接触(n = 6)、身体动作(n = 5)、面部表情(n = 5)、声音特征(n = 4)、生理指标(n = 3)和空间行为(n = 1)。一些研究调查了多个非语言类别。
作为偏执观念的非语言关联,空间行为和脑区活动的证据最为充分。由于研究结果不一致且发表数量较少,压力生理学、信息处理和攻击行为作为潜在非语言关联的证据不太可靠。使用非语言方法评估偏执观念需要更多的研究和评估。非语言评估方法的整合可能会带来超越传统言语方法的新诊断可能性。