Suppr超能文献

学科壁垒需要沟通:一项基于舱室设计的群体决策范式转变下的行为和功能性近红外光谱研究

Disciplinary barriers need communication: a behavioral and fNIRS study under group decision-making paradigm shift based on cabin design.

作者信息

Yang Jiapeng, Jiang Zuhua, Cheng Kexin, Wu Lebao

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2025 May 20;19:1594111. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1594111. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

In the field of interdisciplinary engineering design, the terminology used by decision-makers from different disciplinary backgrounds often exhibits significant disciplinary heterogeneity, resulting in misunderstandings or communication barriers for decision-making teams. Due to the ambiguity of cognitive structures, the impact of interdisciplinary knowledge on decision-making quality and cognitive load was poorly answered. This study, grounded in utility theory and multi-criteria decision theory, introduced an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making task (MADM-LGD) to research the behavioral characteristics of decision-making groups and the cognitive shifts that occur during interdisciplinary decision-making paradigm transitions. An experiment utilizing Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was conducted based on a ship cabin design task, aiming to explore the neural mechanisms underlying interdisciplinary group decision-making. The analysis of experiment revealed several key findings: (1) Prior cognitive level does not significantly affect decision quality during the individual decision-making phase, but it positively influences decision quality during the group decision-making phase. (2) Interdisciplinary communication ability positively impacts decision quality. Hence, teams which exhibit stronger interdisciplinary communication achieve superior decision performance; (3) The task-oriented phase imposes a higher cognitive load compared to the non-task-oriented phase, while interdisciplinary communication helps alleviate this cognitive load, reducing the cognitive pressures associated with heterogeneous engineering semantics, promoting mutual understanding across disciplines, and ultimately enhancing decision quality. This study offers valuable guidance for advancing the empirical theories and practices of interdisciplinary group decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence (HI).

摘要

在跨学科工程设计领域,来自不同学科背景的决策者所使用的术语往往表现出显著的学科异质性,这给决策团队带来了误解或沟通障碍。由于认知结构的模糊性,跨学科知识对决策质量和认知负荷的影响一直未得到充分解答。本研究以效用理论和多准则决策理论为基础,引入了一种增强型多属性决策任务(MADM-LGD),以研究决策群体的行为特征以及跨学科决策范式转变过程中发生的认知变化。基于船舶舱室设计任务,利用功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)进行了一项实验,旨在探索跨学科群体决策背后的神经机制。实验分析得出了几个关键发现:(1)个体决策阶段的先前认知水平对决策质量没有显著影响,但在群体决策阶段对决策质量有积极影响。(2)跨学科沟通能力对决策质量有积极影响。因此,跨学科沟通能力较强的团队能取得更好的决策绩效;(3)与非任务导向阶段相比,任务导向阶段的认知负荷更高,而跨学科沟通有助于减轻这种认知负荷,降低与异构工程语义相关的认知压力,促进跨学科的相互理解,最终提高决策质量。本研究为推进人工智能(AI)和人类智能(HI)中跨学科群体决策的实证理论和实践提供了有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4207/12129914/3b471e78bb88/fnins-19-1594111-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验