Suppr超能文献

心肌对压力超负荷与容量超负荷损伤反应的差异。

Discrepancy in Myocardial Responses to Pressure Overload versus Volume Load Lesions.

作者信息

AbdelMassih Antoine Fakhry, Gomaa Fatma AlZahraa Mostafa, Mouhareb Nermin, Diab Nourine, Helmy Rasha

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Cardiac Sciences, Pediatric Cardiology Division, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025 Jan-Mar;35(1):50-54. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_72_24. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure and volume loads are vital components of every congenital heart disease. Numerous studies have concentrated on investigating myocardial remodeling under varying loading conditions in animal models. The objective of this study was to compare myocardial responses in lesions with volume overload, specifically ventricular septal defects (VSD), and lesions with pressure overload, such as coarctation.

METHODOLOGY

For this purpose, three study groups have been involved: a VSD group ( = 19), a coarctation (CoA) group ( = 20), and healthy age- and sex-matched controls ( = 21). The severity of VSD has been measured by its size. In contrast, the severity of discrete CoA was quantified by the pressure gradient across the coarcted segment. The parasternal long axis assessed septal hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dilatation-systolic myocardial LV velocities using tissue Doppler imaging. The global longitudinal strain was performed to assess LV function accurately.

RESULTS

The CoA groups displayed significant septal hypertrophy compared to the other two study groups: IVSd (CoA: 8 ± 1.6 vs. VSD 5.7 ± 0.9). LV dilatation was more marked in the VSD group: LV end-diastolic dimension (CoA: 30 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 1.7). Systolic septal and mitral annular velocities were reduced in the CoA group and intriguingly exaggerated in the VSD group: Septal basal systolic myocardial velocity: (VSD: 9 ± 2 vs. CoA: 5 ± 1 vs. Controls: 7 ± 0.8). Myocardial GLS was markedly reduced in the CoA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the well-known eccentric-concentric hypertrophy paradigm in volume-pressure loading of the myocardium, pressure load seems to reduce myocardial velocities and LV function to a greater extent than volume loading. This is putatively mediated via myosin class switching, reduced myofilament sensitivity to calcium, and disrupted mechanical-electrical synchrony.

摘要

背景

压力和容量负荷是每种先天性心脏病的重要组成部分。众多研究集中于在动物模型中研究不同负荷条件下的心肌重塑。本研究的目的是比较容量超负荷病变(特别是室间隔缺损,VSD)和压力超负荷病变(如主动脉缩窄)中的心肌反应。

方法

为此,纳入了三个研究组:VSD组(n = 19)、主动脉缩窄(CoA)组(n = 20)以及年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(n = 21)。VSD的严重程度通过其大小来衡量。相比之下,离散型CoA的严重程度通过缩窄段两端的压力梯度来量化。采用组织多普勒成像,通过胸骨旁长轴评估室间隔肥厚以及左心室(LV)舒张期扩大时的收缩期心肌LV速度。进行整体纵向应变以准确评估LV功能。

结果

与其他两个研究组相比,CoA组显示出明显的室间隔肥厚:室间隔舒张末期厚度(CoA组:8 ± 1.6 vs. VSD组5.7 ± 0.9)。VSD组的LV扩张更为明显:LV舒张末期内径(CoA组:30 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 1.7)。CoA组的收缩期室间隔和二尖瓣环速度降低,而有趣的是VSD组则升高:室间隔基底部收缩期心肌速度:(VSD组:9 ± 2 vs. CoA组:5 ± 1 vs. 对照组:7 ± 0.8)。CoA组的心肌整体纵向应变明显降低。

结论

除了心肌容量 - 压力负荷中众所周知的离心性 - 向心性肥厚模式外,压力负荷似乎比容量负荷在更大程度上降低心肌速度和LV功能。这可能是通过肌球蛋白类别转换、肌丝对钙的敏感性降低以及机械 - 电同步性破坏介导的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验