Azab Mohammed A, Sarhan Khalid, Hernández-Hernández Alan, Atallah Oday, Clervius Helene
Department of Neurosurgery, Cairo University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Jun 4:19714009251347828. doi: 10.1177/19714009251347828.
BackgroundMiddle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is an increasingly common procedure involved in the treatment of various vascular and neoplastic diseases. Understanding its anatomical nuances and clinical implications is fundamental in enhancing the safety of preoperative embolization.MethodsA systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to consolidate literature on the MMA anomalous variations. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched using our predefined criteria until 2025. Inclusion encompassed studies focusing on the clinical perspectives of MMA's anomalous anatomy and endovascular implications.ResultsTwelve articles met inclusion criteria, exploring the clinical significance of the MMA's anatomical variations in various clinical situations. We identified 11 case reports, and we also reported the clinical significance of the cases identified among different case series for the treatment of CSDH and other involved pathologies. Anomalous variations of the MMA involving either its origin, branching or connections were detected clinically in about 43 patients in the literature. We identified the basilar artery as an origin of the MMA in 9 case reports. The ophthalmic origin of the MMA was reported in about 12 patients, while an accessory meningeal artery arising from an ophthalmic artery was only reported in two cases.ConclusionProperly identifying the anomalous variants of the MMA is considerably valuable in preoperative planning and decision-making for the endovascular management of various pathologies involving the dura. To choose an appropriate tool and method of endovascular intervention, understanding the anatomical features and variability of the MMA is crucial.
背景
脑膜中动脉(MMA)栓塞术在各种血管性和肿瘤性疾病的治疗中应用日益普遍。了解其解剖学细微差别和临床意义对于提高术前栓塞的安全性至关重要。
方法
按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述,以整合有关MMA异常变异的文献。使用我们预先设定的标准对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行系统检索,直至2025年。纳入的研究包括关注MMA异常解剖结构的临床观点和血管内影响的研究。
结果
12篇文章符合纳入标准,探讨了MMA解剖变异在各种临床情况下的临床意义。我们确定了11篇病例报告,还报告了在不同病例系列中确定的病例对慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)及其他相关病变治疗的临床意义。文献中临床检测到约43例患者存在MMA起源、分支或连接方面的异常变异。我们在9篇病例报告中确定基底动脉为MMA的起源。约12例患者报告了MMA的眼动脉起源,而仅2例报告了眼动脉发出的脑膜副动脉。
结论
正确识别MMA的异常变异对于涉及硬脑膜的各种病变的血管内治疗术前规划和决策具有重要价值。了解MMA的解剖特征和变异性对于选择合适的血管内干预工具和方法至关重要。