Jansen Fleur A C, Rubert Josep, van Norren Klaske, Fogliano Vincenzo, Hoppenbrouwers Tamara
Department of Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University and Research, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University and Research, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG Wageningen, the Netherlands; Department of Nutritional Biology, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2025 Jul;318(Pt 1):144889. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144889. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
Advanced Glycation End products (AGEs) are covalent protein adducts formed through the Maillard reaction. High dietary intake might harm human health, however studies on their impact remain inconclusive. A proposed mechanism is that dietary AGEs trigger inflammation by interacting with the AGEs receptor (RAGE). However, in vitro studies on dietary AGE-RAGE signaling have reported inconsistent results, probably due to methodological issues. This study aimed to seek a standardized model of dietary AGE-RAGE signaling.
In vitro models were characterized for surface and total RAGE expression using flow cytometry. Both commercially available and in-house prepared dietary AGE preparations were analyzed for AGE levels, aggregation, and LPS content, then tested in the model with the highest surface RAGE expression.
All immortalized cell lines expressed intracellular RAGE, while its surface expression was marginal or even absent. Only M-CSF-differentiated M0 macrophages showed significant surface RAGE expression. Some glycated dietary proteins induced inflammation in this model, but not all. While these proteins showed RAGE affinity in a chemical assay, the inflammatory response could not be reduced by the RAGE antagonist FPS-ZM1. Interestingly, co-incubation with the LPS scavenger PMB reduced inflammation despite negligible LPS levels in the sample.
These results challenge the hypothesis that dietary AGEs cause inflammation via RAGE activation, as glycated dietary proteins alone do not seem to induce acute inflammation. To better understand the biological activity of dietary AGEs, future studies should confirm surface RAGE expression, detail glycation methods and glycated protein characteristics, and account for LPS interference.
晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)是通过美拉德反应形成的共价蛋白质加合物。高膳食摄入量可能会损害人体健康,然而关于其影响的研究尚无定论。一种提出的机制是膳食AGEs通过与AGEs受体(RAGE)相互作用引发炎症。然而,关于膳食AGE-RAGE信号传导的体外研究报告的结果并不一致,这可能是由于方法学问题。本研究旨在寻找一种标准化的膳食AGE-RAGE信号传导模型。
使用流式细胞术对体外模型的表面和总RAGE表达进行表征。对市售和自制的膳食AGE制剂进行AGE水平、聚集和LPS含量分析,然后在表面RAGE表达最高的模型中进行测试。
所有永生化细胞系均表达细胞内RAGE,但其表面表达微乎其微甚至不存在。只有M-CSF分化的M0巨噬细胞表现出显著的表面RAGE表达。一些糖化膳食蛋白在该模型中诱导炎症,但并非全部。虽然这些蛋白在化学分析中显示出RAGE亲和力,但RAGE拮抗剂FPS-ZM1并不能降低炎症反应。有趣的是,尽管样品中的LPS水平可忽略不计,但与LPS清除剂PMB共同孵育可减轻炎症。
这些结果对膳食AGEs通过RAGE激活引起炎症的假设提出了挑战,因为仅糖化膳食蛋白似乎不会诱导急性炎症。为了更好地理解膳食AGEs的生物活性,未来的研究应确认表面RAGE表达,详细说明糖化方法和糖化蛋白特征,并考虑LPS干扰。