• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于脊髓损伤(单发性脊髓损伤)分类的神经学检查中运动和感觉成分的访谈版与在线自我报告版的有效性和可靠性

Validity and Reliability of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).

作者信息

Bryce Thomas N, Afzal Laiba, Burns Stephen P, Dijkers Marcel P, Kirshblum Steven, Marino Ralph J, O'Connor Jayme, Ramirez Arianny, Snider Brittany, Spielman Lisa, Tsai Chung-Ying

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.016
PMID:40466968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility, validity, and reliability of the Online Neurological Exam for Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI), a patient-reported outcome measure of the motor and sensory components needed for classifying spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI).

DESIGN

Repeat administration (1wk interval) of either an online self-administered or an interviewer-administered survey (both supported by extensive computer-provided illustrations and animations) followed by an in-person ISNCSCI examination after an additional week.

SETTING

Academic free standing rehabilitation center and medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 67 individuals (N=67) with chronic SCI with complete or incomplete injuries representing 6 groups based upon neurologic level of injury (C1-4, C5-6, C7-T1, T2-T6, T7-T12, and L1-S5) who were English-speaking and aged ≥18 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ISNCSCI neurologic levels and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade.

RESULTS

Overall test-retest agreement was substantial, with kappas ranging from 0.69 to 0.84 for all the neurologic levels and AIS grades. Overall agreement between the neurologic levels and AIS grades derived from the first administration of One-SCI (participant survey responses) and the ISNCSCI examinations was moderate to substantial, with kappas ranging from 0.55 to 0.71. The median time needed to complete the interview and online versions of One-SCI the first time was 51 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings generally support the reliability and validity of both interview and online versions of One-SCI. One-SCI does take nearly 1 hour to complete, which possibly will limit its widespread use. The results should be replicated in larger samples.

摘要

目的

检验脊髓损伤在线神经学检查(One-SCI)的可行性、有效性和可靠性。One-SCI是一种患者报告的结局指标,用于根据脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)对脊髓损伤(SCI)进行分类所需的运动和感觉成分的测量。

设计

重复进行(间隔1周)在线自我管理或访谈员管理的调查(均由大量计算机提供的插图和动画支持),再过一周后进行面对面的ISNCSCI检查。

地点

学术独立康复中心和医疗中心。

参与者

共有67名慢性SCI患者(N = 67),损伤程度为完全或不完全损伤,根据损伤的神经学水平分为6组(C1-4、C5-6、C7-T1、T2-T6、T7-T12和L1-S5),均为英语使用者且年龄≥18岁。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

ISNCSCI神经学水平和美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级(AIS)。

结果

总体重测一致性较高,所有神经学水平和AIS分级的kappa值范围为0.69至0.84。首次进行One-SCI(参与者调查回复)得出的神经学水平和AIS分级与ISNCSCI检查之间的总体一致性为中等至较高,kappa值范围为0.55至0.71。首次完成访谈版和在线版One-SCI所需的中位时间为51分钟。

结论

研究结果总体上支持访谈版和在线版One-SCI的可靠性和有效性。One-SCI完成时间将近1小时,这可能会限制其广泛应用。结果应在更大样本中重复验证。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).用于脊髓损伤(单发性脊髓损伤)分类的神经学检查中运动和感觉成分的访谈版与在线自我报告版的有效性和可靠性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.016.
2
Development of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021.
3
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acute hospital-based spinal cord injuries services: systematic review.急性医院脊髓损伤服务的有效性和成本效益:系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(19):iii, 1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta7190.
5
Early repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the spinal cord region for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A case report.脊髓区域早期重复经颅磁刺激治疗脊髓损伤:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42948. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042948.
6
Acute assessment of spinal cord injury in New South Wales: A retrospective study of current practice in two spinal cord injury referral centers.新南威尔士州脊髓损伤的急性评估:对两个脊髓损伤转诊中心当前实践的回顾性研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Jan;48(1):46-53. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2247625. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Synergistic integration of epidural spinal cord stimulation with robotic therapy and neurorehabilitation to facilitate functional recovery in chronic sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury: A case series.硬膜外脊髓刺激与机器人疗法及神经康复的协同整合以促进慢性感觉运动完全性脊髓损伤的功能恢复:病例系列
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jun 24;14:27536351251343738. doi: 10.1177/27536351251343738. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Motor and sensory assessment of patients in clinical trials for pharmacological therapy of acute spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the ASIA Standards.急性脊髓损伤药物治疗临床试验中患者的运动和感觉评估:ASIA标准的心理测量特性
J Neurotrauma. 2008 Nov;25(11):1273-301. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0617.
10
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人慢性疼痛的体力活动与锻炼:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 14;1(1):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub2.