• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资源损耗效应会降低情绪调节过程中对分心(而非重新评价)的偏好。

Depletion Effects Reduce the Preference for Distraction (but Not Reappraisal) During Emotion Regulation.

作者信息

Huang Ruiwen, Le Mei, Yuan JiaJin, Yang Jiemin

机构信息

Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

Sichuan Key Laboratory of Psychology and Behavior of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Psych J. 2025 Aug;14(4):583-590. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70021. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1002/pchj.70021
PMID:40467342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318586/
Abstract

Emotion regulation choice (ERC) requires cognitive control resources. However, it remains unknown whether and how individuals' internal resource levels may influence their ERC. To address this question, 51 participants first performed a depletion or non-depletion cognitive task. Then, they were presented with negative pictures of high and low intensity and were required to choose distraction or reappraisal, to regulate their emotion, or watch (no regulation) the negative stimulus. The results indicated that individuals showed a greater usage preference for distraction in high-intensity emotional situations. Besides, individuals' choice of reappraisal was not affected by emotional intensity. More importantly, the depletion effects led to a significant increase in the choice of watch and reduced the choice of distraction (but not reappraisal). These results suggest that cognitive depletion weakens emotion regulation willingness and has different effects on distraction and reappraisal.

摘要

情绪调节选择(ERC)需要认知控制资源。然而,个体的内部资源水平是否以及如何影响他们的ERC仍然未知。为了解决这个问题,51名参与者首先执行了一项耗竭或非耗竭认知任务。然后,他们观看了高强度和低强度的负面图片,并被要求选择分心或重新评价来调节情绪,或者观看(不调节)负面刺激。结果表明,在高强度情绪情境中,个体对分心的使用偏好更大。此外,个体对重新评价的选择不受情绪强度的影响。更重要的是,耗竭效应导致观看选择显著增加,分心选择减少(但重新评价选择未减少)。这些结果表明,认知耗竭会削弱情绪调节意愿,并且对分心和重新评价有不同的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc4/12318586/0a69f0134bad/PCHJ-14-583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc4/12318586/41765ea8ec8e/PCHJ-14-583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc4/12318586/0a69f0134bad/PCHJ-14-583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc4/12318586/41765ea8ec8e/PCHJ-14-583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc4/12318586/0a69f0134bad/PCHJ-14-583-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Depletion Effects Reduce the Preference for Distraction (but Not Reappraisal) During Emotion Regulation.资源损耗效应会降低情绪调节过程中对分心(而非重新评价)的偏好。
Psych J. 2025 Aug;14(4):583-590. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70021. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Effectiveness of cognitive reappraisal and distraction for induced acute pain: A laboratory study.认知重评和分心对诱导性急性疼痛的效果:一项实验室研究。
Health Psychol. 2024 Jul;43(7):500-514. doi: 10.1037/hea0001374. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Committing to emotion regulation: Factors impacting the choice to implement a reappraisal after its generation.致力于情绪调节:影响在重新评估产生后选择实施该策略的因素。
Emotion. 2025 Jun;25(4):787-801. doi: 10.1037/emo0001455. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
4
Weathering the storm of emotions: immediate and lasting effects of reinterpretation and distancing on event-related potentials and their association with habitual use of cognitive reappraisal.应对情绪的风暴:重新解释和距离对事件相关电位的即时和持久影响及其与习惯性使用认知重评的关系。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Aug;23(4):1113-1128. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01105-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
The role of the ventral striatum in the relationship between impulsive decision-making and emotional self-regulation by cognitive reappraisal.腹侧纹状体在冲动决策与通过认知重评进行情绪自我调节之间关系中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13599-8.
6
Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review.临床人群中的神经影像学认知重评,以确定增强情绪调节的神经靶点。一项系统综述。
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
The VLPFC-Engaged Voluntary Emotion Regulation: Combined TMS-fMRI Evidence for the Neural Circuit of Cognitive Reappraisal.背外侧前额叶皮层参与的自愿情绪调节:认知重评神经回路的 TMS-fMRI 联合证据。
J Neurosci. 2023 Aug 23;43(34):6046-6060. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
8
Training in Cognitive Reappraisal Normalizes Whole-Brain Indices of Emotion Regulation in Borderline Personality Disorder.认知重评训练可使边缘型人格障碍的全脑情绪调节指标正常化。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Aug;9(8):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
EEG-based emotion recognition using a temporal-difference minimizing neural network.基于脑电图,使用时间差最小化神经网络的情绪识别
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Apr;18(2):405-416. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-10004-w. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Focus on the sex-specific neural markers in the discrimination of various degrees of depression.关注性别特异性神经标志物在不同程度抑郁症鉴别中的作用。
Psychoradiology. 2024 Apr 9;4:kkae006. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkae006. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex differences of brain cortical structure in major depressive disorder.
重度抑郁症患者大脑皮质结构的性别差异。
Psychoradiology. 2023 Sep 8;3:kkad014. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad014. eCollection 2023.
4
When and How to Regulate: Everyday Emotion-Regulation Strategy Use and Stressor Intensity.何时以及如何调节:日常情绪调节策略的运用与压力源强度
Affect Sci. 2021 Dec 10;3(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00087-1. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
A Multilab Replication of the Ego Depletion Effect.自我损耗效应的多实验室重复验证
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/1948550619887702. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Strong Effort Manipulations Reduce Response Caution: A Preregistered Reinvention of the Ego-Depletion Paradigm.强烈的努力操作减少反应谨慎:自我损耗范式的预先注册再发明。
Psychol Sci. 2020 May;31(5):531-547. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904990. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
No Effect of Ego Depletion on Risk Taking.自我损耗对冒险行为没有影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46103-0.
8
Emotion regulation choice: a broad examination of external factors.情绪调节策略选择:外部因素的广泛考察。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):242-261. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1611544. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
Ego Depletion Reduces Attention Control: Evidence From Two High-Powered Preregistered Experiments.自我损耗降低注意力控制:来自两个高功率预先注册实验的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 May;45(5):728-739. doi: 10.1177/0146167218796473. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
The fit between emotion regulation choice and individual resources is associated with adaptive functioning among young children.情绪调节选择与个体资源之间的适配度与幼儿的适应性功能有关。
Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):597-605. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1470494. Epub 2018 May 7.