• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生选拔面试:对非言语可观察交流的见解:一项横断面研究。

Medical student selection interviews: insights into nonverbal observable communications: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Huang Pin-Hsiang, Fan Kang-Chen, Waits Alexander, Shulruf Boaz, Chuang Yi-Fang

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities and Medical Education, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Office of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Jun;37(2):153-161. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.332. Epub 2025 May 29.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2025.332
PMID:40468493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12149746/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Interviews play a crucial role in the medical school selection process, although little is known about interviewers' non-verbal observable communications (NoVOC) during the interviews. This study investigates how interviewers perceive NoVOC exhibited by interviewees in two medical schools, one in Taiwan and the other in Australia. The study also explores potential cross-cultural differences in these perceptions.

METHODS

A 26-item questionnaire was developed using a Delphi-like method to identify NoVOC. Interviewers from the University of New South Wales, Australia, and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan (n=47 and N=78, respectively) rated these NoVOC between 2018 and 2021. Factor analyses identified and validated underlying factors. Measurement invariance across countries and genders was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 125 interviewers completed the questionnaire, including 78 from Taiwan and 47 from Australia. Using exploratory factor analysis, 14 items yielded reliable three factors "charming," "disengaged," and "anxious" (Cronbach's α=0.853, 0.714, and 0.628, respectively). The measurement invariance analysis indicated that the factor models were invariant across genders but significantly different between the two countries. Further analysis revealed inconsistencies in interpreting the "anxious" factor between Taiwan and Australia.

CONCLUSION

The three distinct factors revealed in this study provide valuable insights into the NoVOC that interviewers perceive and evaluate during the interview process. The findings highlight the importance of considering non-verbal communication in selecting medical students and emphasize the need for training and awareness among interviewers. Understanding the impact of non-verbal behaviors can improve selection processes to mitigate bias and enhance the fairness and reliability of medical student selection.

摘要

目的

面试在医学院校选拔过程中起着至关重要的作用,然而对于面试过程中面试官的非语言可观察交流(NoVOC)却知之甚少。本研究调查了两所医学院校(一所位于台湾,另一所位于澳大利亚)的面试官如何看待受访者表现出的NoVOC。该研究还探讨了这些看法中潜在的跨文化差异。

方法

采用类似德尔菲法开发了一份包含26个条目的问卷,以确定NoVOC。来自澳大利亚新南威尔士大学和台湾国立阳明交通大学的面试官(分别为n = 47和N = 78)在2018年至2021年期间对这些NoVOC进行了评分。因子分析识别并验证了潜在因子。检验了不同国家和性别的测量不变性。

结果

共有125名面试官完成了问卷,其中78名来自台湾,47名来自澳大利亚。通过探索性因子分析,14个条目产生了可靠的三个因子“有魅力的”、“不投入的”和“焦虑的”(克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.853、0.714和0.628)。测量不变性分析表明,因子模型在不同性别间具有不变性,但在两个国家之间存在显著差异。进一步分析发现,台湾和澳大利亚在解释“焦虑的”因子方面存在不一致。

结论

本研究揭示的三个不同因子为面试官在面试过程中所感知和评估的NoVOC提供了有价值的见解。研究结果凸显了在选拔医学生时考虑非语言交流的重要性,并强调了面试官进行培训和提高意识的必要性。了解非语言行为的影响可以改进选拔过程,以减少偏见,提高医学生选拔的公平性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db9/12149746/e76e9f8a5096/kjme-2025-332f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db9/12149746/e76e9f8a5096/kjme-2025-332f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db9/12149746/e76e9f8a5096/kjme-2025-332f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Medical student selection interviews: insights into nonverbal observable communications: a cross-sectional study.医学生选拔面试:对非言语可观察交流的见解:一项横断面研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Jun;37(2):153-161. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.332. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Influence of medical school applicants' demographic and cognitive characteristics on interviewers' ratings of noncognitive traits.医学院申请者的人口统计学和认知特征对面试官非认知特质评分的影响。
Acad Med. 1995 Jun;70(6):532-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199506000-00015.
3
Medical student selection process enhanced by improving selection algorithms and changing the focus of interviews in Australia: a descriptive study.澳大利亚通过改进选拔算法和改变面试重点来加强医学生选拔过程:一项描述性研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:31. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.31. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Multiple mini interview (MMI) for general practice training selection in Australia: interviewers' motivation.澳大利亚全科医学培训选拔中的多站式面试(MMI):面试官的动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1128-z.
5
A longitudinal study of the impact of interviews on medical school admissions in Taiwan.一项关于面试对台湾医学院招生影响的纵向研究。
Eval Health Prof. 2010 Jun;33(2):140-63. doi: 10.1177/0163278710361920. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
6
The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores.MCAT 和 GPA 入学前学术指标对面试成绩的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9779-9. Epub 2017 May 13.
7
Equity in interviews: do personal characteristics impact on admission interview scores?面试中的公平性:个人特征是否会影响录取面试成绩?
Med Educ. 2010 Nov;44(11):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03771.x.
8
Effectiveness of Multiple Mini Interviews in medical school admissions: assessment using The Big Five Personality framework.多重迷你面试在医学院招生中的有效性:基于大五人格框架的评估
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1352. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1352. eCollection 2025.
9
Current medical student interviewers add data to the evaluation of medical school applicants.当前的医学生面试官会在对医学院申请者的评估中添加数据。
Med Educ Online. 2010 Jun 9;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5245.
10
Interviewer bias in medical student selection.医学生选拔中的面试官偏见。
Med J Aust. 2010 Sep 20;193(6):343-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04015.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Popularity at first sight: Dominant behaviours mediate the link between extraversion and popularity in face-to-face and virtual group interactions.一见钟情:在面对面和虚拟群体互动中,外向性格和受欢迎程度之间的联系由主导行为介导。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Jul;63(3):1226-1253. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12720. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Medical student selection process enhanced by improving selection algorithms and changing the focus of interviews in Australia: a descriptive study.澳大利亚通过改进选拔算法和改变面试重点来加强医学生选拔过程:一项描述性研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:31. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.31. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Narcissism and Popularity Over Time: How Agentic and Antagonistic Aspects of Narcissism Shape the Development of Peer Relationships.
自恋与受欢迎程度的纵向研究:自恋的意志和对抗方面如何塑造同伴关系的发展。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):643-659. doi: 10.1177/0146167219872477. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
Retest effects in medical selection interviews.医学选拔面试中的重测效应。
Med Educ. 2019 Feb;53(2):175-183. doi: 10.1111/medu.13759. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
5
A meta-analytic perspective on the valid use of subjective human judgement to make medical school admission decisions.从荟萃分析的角度看主观人类判断在医学院录取决策中的有效应用。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1522225. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1522225.
6
The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.客观结构化临床考试中考官的观察与见解。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec 27;14:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.34. eCollection 2017.
7
Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Samples and Missing Data.小样本与缺失数据的探索性因子分析
J Pers Assess. 2017 Nov-Dec;99(6):637-652. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1252382. Epub 2016 Dec 8.