van de Wetering Gijs, Kim Hyunchung, Roberts David, Hikichi Yusuke, Smith Martina, Tada Yayoi
Executive Director, Modelling & Meta-Analysis, OPEN Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Economics Outcomes Research (HEOR), Market Access & Government Affairs (MAx & GA), Bristol Myers Squibb, Tokyo, Japan.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):922-933. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib apremilast as a treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients from a Japan healthcare system perspective.
A Markov sequence model was developed, consisting of an induction phase, maintenance phase, best supportive care and death. Clinical inputs were predominantly derived from the POETYK-PSO-1 and -2 trials (NCT03624127 and NCT03611751), and cost and resource use inputs were derived from several Japanese sources, including Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHLW) data and the outputs of a Delphi survey with Japanese clinical experts. Health-related quality of life inputs were based on the change in utility associated with different levels of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty around the base case and several scenario analyses were performed to explore structural uncertainty related to assumptions and methodological choices.
In the base case, treatment with deucravacitinib results in a discounted QALY gain of 0.30 and discounted incremental costs of ¥459,771 compared to apremilast, resulting in an ICUR of ¥1,546,713 per QALY which is below the Japanese willingness to pay threshold of ¥5,000,000 per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the results of the base case. The latter shows that deucravacitinib has a 97.8% probability of being cost-effective compared to apremilast at the ¥5,000,000 per QALY threshold. The outcomes of all scenarios confirmed the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib compared to apremilast, with deucravacitinib being dominant in one scenario.
Deucravacitinib is cost-effective compared to apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Japan, primarily driven by improvements in health-related quality of life associated with a more favorable PASI response. This conclusion is supported by extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.
本研究旨在从日本医疗保健系统的角度评估度普利尤单抗与阿普米司特治疗中重度银屑病患者的成本效益。
开发了一个马尔可夫序列模型,包括诱导期、维持期、最佳支持治疗和死亡。临床数据主要来源于POETYK-PSO-1和-2试验(NCT03624127和NCT03611751),成本和资源使用数据来源于日本的多个来源,包括厚生省的数据以及与日本临床专家进行的德尔菲调查的结果。与健康相关的生活质量数据基于与不同程度的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)反应相关的效用变化。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析,以考虑基础病例周围的不确定性,并进行了几种情景分析,以探索与假设和方法选择相关的结构不确定性。
在基础病例中,与阿普米司特相比,度普利尤单抗治疗导致贴现质量调整生命年(QALY)增益为0.30,贴现增量成本为459,771日元,导致每QALY的增量成本效果比(ICUR)为1,546,713日元,低于日本每QALY 5,000,000日元的支付意愿阈值。确定性和概率敏感性分析支持基础病例的结果。后者表明,在每QALY 5,000,000日元的阈值下,与阿普米司特相比,度普利尤单抗具有成本效益的概率为97.8%。所有情景的结果均证实了度普利尤单抗与阿普米司特相比的成本效益,度普利尤单抗在一种情景中占主导地位。
在日本中重度斑块状银屑病患者中,度普利尤单抗与阿普米司特相比具有成本效益,这主要是由于与更有利的PASI反应相关的健康相关生活质量的改善。这一结论得到了广泛的敏感性和情景分析的支持。