Suppr超能文献

用于预防非组胺能性正常C1抑制剂性血管性水肿发作的拉那度单抗:随机、双盲CASPIAN研究及CASPIAN开放标签扩展研究的结果

Lanadelumab for prevention of attacks of non-histaminergic normal C1 inhibitor angioedema: results from the randomized, double-blind CASPIAN Study and CASPIAN open-label extension.

作者信息

Riedl Marc A, Staubach Petra, Farkas Henriette, Zanichelli Andrea, Ren Hong, Nurse Christina, Andresen Irmgard, Juethner Salomé, Yu Ming, Zhang Jingmei

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 May 21;16:1502325. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1502325. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trial data for non-histaminergic normal C1 inhibitor (nC1INH) angioedema prevention are lacking.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥12 years with investigator-confirmed non-histaminergic nC1INH angioedema were enrolled in phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind CASPIAN Study (NCT04206605). Patients with ≥1 investigator-confirmed angioedema attack/4 weeks during observation period were randomized 2:1 to lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo. Primary efficacy outcome was investigator-confirmed angioedema attack number during the 26-week treatment period. Safety was analyzed as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). After completing the treatment period, patients could roll over to CASPIAN open-label extension (CASPIAN OLE; NCT04444895) for an additional 26-week lanadelumab treatment to assess long-term safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients (mean ± SD age of 42.8 ± 12.9 years, 80.5% women, 88.3% White) were enrolled (lanadelumab, 50; placebo, 27). Primary efficacy outcome was not different with lanadelumab versus placebo (1.82 vs. 1.78 attacks/month; rate ratio, 1.02; p=0.90), with attack rate reduction from baseline in both groups. Subgroups meeting a clinical definition of HAE [known mutations (n=5) or family history and unknown mutations (n=13)] showed positive attack rate reduction trend with lanadelumab versus placebo. Angioedema attack rate reduction with lanadelumab was observed in CASPIAN OLE. In both studies, all treatment-related TEAEs were non-serious, and most were non-severe; most frequent treatment-related TEAEs were similar to those previously reported in lanadelumab clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-histaminergic nC1INH angioedema, lanadelumab safety was consistent with previous studies; efficacy remained inconclusive due to unmet CASPIAN primary endpoint. Overall results suggest potential clinical benefit in symptom control.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifiers NCT04206605, NCT04444895.

摘要

背景

缺乏关于非组胺能正常C1抑制剂(nC1INH)预防血管性水肿的随机对照试验数据。

方法

年龄≥12岁、经研究者确认患有非组胺能nC1INH血管性水肿的患者被纳入III期、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲的里海研究(NCT04206605)。在观察期内每4周有≥1次经研究者确认的血管性水肿发作的患者按2:1随机分组,每2周接受300mg拉那鲁单抗或安慰剂治疗。主要疗效指标是26周治疗期内经研究者确认的血管性水肿发作次数。安全性分析为治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)。完成治疗期后,患者可转入里海开放标签扩展研究(里海OLE;NCT04444895),接受额外26周的拉那鲁单抗治疗,以评估长期安全性和疗效。

结果

共纳入77例患者(平均±标准差年龄为42.8±12.9岁,80.5%为女性, 88.3%为白人)(拉那鲁单抗组50例,安慰剂组27例)。拉那鲁单抗组与安慰剂组的主要疗效指标无差异(分别为每月1.82次发作和1.78次发作;率比为1.02;p=0.90),两组的发作率均较基线下降。符合遗传性血管性水肿临床定义的亚组[已知突变(n=5)或有家族史且突变未知(n=13)]显示,与安慰剂相比,拉那鲁单抗组的发作率有下降趋势。在里海OLE研究中观察到拉那鲁单抗可降低血管性水肿发作率。在两项研究中,所有与治疗相关的TEAE均不严重,且大多数为非重度;最常见的与治疗相关的TEAE与拉那鲁单抗既往临床试验中报告的相似。

结论

在非组胺能nC1INH血管性水肿患者中,拉那鲁单抗的安全性与既往研究一致;由于未达到里海研究的主要终点,其疗效仍无定论。总体结果提示在症状控制方面可能具有临床益处。

临床试验注册

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/,标识符NCT04206605、NCT04444895。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ce/12135624/f697f641605c/fimmu-16-1502325-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验