Comparative Effectiveness of Rivastigmine and Donepezil in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness of rivastigmine and donepezil in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Of the 250 subjects, 127 (50.8%) were men, while 123 (49.2%) were women. Baseline cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog). The results showed that 83 (33.2%) patients improved, 84 (33.6%) remained stable, and 83 (33.2%) experienced cognitive decline. The difference between the two groups was not significant with respect to cognitive outcomes (Chi-square = 0.08, df = 2, N = 250, p = 0.96). However, rivastigmine was associated with a higher rate of side effects (65, or 52%), which could hinder adherence. Both groups had an average of 1.48 hospitalization episodes per patient. Biomarker analysis suggested that 144 (57.6%) of patients tested positive for amyloid on positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis data, illustrated through mean values, showed amyloid beta at 546.38 pg/mL and tau at 219.85 pg/mL - both linked to cognitive decline. Higher levels of tau were significantly correlated with greater cognitive decline. Statistically, there were significant differences between the treatment groups in terms of MMSE scores and CSF biomarkers (p < 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference in cognitive outcomes between the drugs, subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in baseline MMSE scores and CSF biomarker levels (p < 0.05), suggesting heterogeneity in disease severity. Therefore, personalized strategies for managing patients with AD should be constructed based on the drug's side effect profile, comorbidities, and biomarker status. Future studies should focus on biomarker-directed and combination therapies to improve treatment efficacy.