• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分期双侧腕管松解术患者转移的预测因素

Predictors of Patient Migration for Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures.

作者信息

Liimakka Adriana P, Amen Troy B, Rudisill Samuel S, Fufa Duretti

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jul;50(7):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.017. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.017
PMID:40471759
Abstract

PURPOSE

Staged bilateral carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgical treatment for patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome refractory to nonsurgical measures. Factors influencing whether a patient undergoes surgery on both hands by the same or different surgeons are not well characterized. This study aimed to identify patient and clinical factors associated with patient migration during staged bilateral CTR within 90 days of the index procedure.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent CTR between 2015 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner Database. Differences in patient demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical technique, and postoperative course were assessed between patients who underwent contralateral CTR within 90 days with the same surgeon who performed the index procedure, and those with a different surgeon. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with patient migration while adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 213,676 patients underwent staged bilateral CTR within the study period, of which 182,008 (85.2%) had both procedures performed by the same surgeon and 31,668 (14.8%) had them performed by two different surgeons. Factors independently associated with greater odds of patient migration included utilization of endoscopic technique for the index procedure (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17-1.23), incidence of postoperative complications following the index procedure (1.22, 1.09-1.36), and being insured by Medicaid (1.29, 1.23-1.34) relative to commercial insurance. Those residing in rural regions were less likely to change surgeons than those living in urban areas (0.85, 0.82-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 15% of patients had their contralateral CTR procedure performed by a different surgeon within three months of their index CTR. Patient migration was associated with Medicaid insurance, use of endoscopic techniques, postoperative complication, and urban residence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results may inform the design of future prospective studies to better understand key factors contributing to patient migration.

摘要

目的

分期双侧腕管松解术(CTR)是一种常见的外科治疗方法,用于治疗非手术治疗无效的双侧腕管综合征患者。影响患者双手由同一位或不同外科医生进行手术的因素尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在确定与初次手术90天内分期双侧CTR期间患者更换医生相关的患者和临床因素。

方法

使用PearlDiver Mariner数据库识别2015年至2022年间接受CTR的成年患者。对在初次手术90天内由进行初次手术的同一位外科医生进行对侧CTR的患者与由不同外科医生进行手术的患者的人口统计学和临床特征、手术技术及术后病程差异进行评估。多变量逻辑回归在调整潜在混杂因素的同时确定与患者更换医生相关的因素。

结果

在研究期间,共有213,676例患者接受了分期双侧CTR,其中182,008例(85.2%)的双侧手术由同一位外科医生进行,31,668例(14.8%)由两位不同的外科医生进行。与患者更换医生几率增加独立相关的因素包括初次手术采用内镜技术(比值比1.20,95%可信区间1.17-1.23)、初次手术后术后并发症发生率(1.22,1.09-1.36)以及相对于商业保险由医疗补助保险承保(1.29,1.23-1.34)。与居住在城市地区的患者相比,居住在农村地区的患者更换外科医生的可能性较小(0.85,0.82-0.89)。

结论

近15%的患者在初次CTR术后三个月内由不同的外科医生进行对侧CTR手术。患者更换医生与医疗补助保险、内镜技术的使用、术后并发症及城市居住有关。

临床意义

这些结果可为未来前瞻性研究的设计提供参考,以更好地了解导致患者更换医生的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Patient Migration for Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures.分期双侧腕管松解术患者转移的预测因素
J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jul;50(7):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.017. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
3
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
6
Total Arthroplasty Versus Trapeziectomy With Ligamentoplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis: 5-year Outcomes.全关节置换术与韧带成形术联合大多角骨切除术治疗大多角骨-第一掌骨关节炎:5年随访结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003404.
7
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Occupational Therapy Referrals.开放式与内窥镜下腕管松解术:阿片类药物处方模式和职业治疗转介的比较。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jul;19(5):776-782. doi: 10.1177/15589447221130092. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression.一项比较内镜下与开放性腕管减压术有效性的综述的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110202.08818.c1.
10
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.