Zhang Xu, Hancock Roeland, Santaniello Sabato
Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2025 Jun 25;22(3). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ade18b.
To develop a coil placement optimization pipeline for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that improves over existing solutions by guaranteeing the feasibility of the solution when double-cone coils are used and/or targets are placed over nonconvex scalp areas like the occipital region.Our proposed pipeline estimates feasible candidate coil locations by projecting the coil's geometry over the scalp around the target site and optimizing the coil's orientation to maximize scalp exposure to coil while avoiding coil-scalp collision. Then, the reciprocity principle is used to select the best position/orientation among candidates and maximize the average electric field (E-field) intensity at the target site. Our pipeline was tested on five magnetic resonance imaging-derived human head models for three different targets (motor cortex, lateral cerebellum, and cerebellar inion) and four coil models (planar coil: MagStim D70; double-cone coils: MagStim DCC, MagVenture Cool-D-B80, and Deymed 120BFV).Our pipeline returned several feasible solutions for any combination of anatomical target and coil, calculated and screened over 2000 candidates in minutes, and resulted in optimal locations that satisfy the minimum coil-scalp distance, whereas the direct method returned feasible candidates for just one combination of target and coil, i.e. planar coil and convex target over the motor cortex. We also found that, when the objective is to maximize the E-field magnitude, the target-to-scalp extension line is a better axis for coil translation compared to the normal vector at the scalp's surface, which is commonly used in existing approaches.We expand the use of numerical optimization for coil placement to double-cone coils, which are rapidly diffusing in research and clinical settings, and novel application domains, e.g. cerebellar TMS and ataxia treatment.
开发一种用于经颅磁刺激(TMS)的线圈放置优化流程,该流程通过在使用双锥线圈和/或目标位于枕部等非凸头皮区域时保证解决方案的可行性,从而优于现有解决方案。我们提出的流程通过将线圈几何形状投影到目标部位周围的头皮上,并优化线圈方向以最大化头皮对线圈的暴露同时避免线圈与头皮碰撞,来估计可行的候选线圈位置。然后,利用互易原理在候选位置中选择最佳位置/方向,并最大化目标部位的平均电场(E场)强度。我们的流程在五个磁共振成像衍生的人体头部模型上针对三个不同目标(运动皮层、外侧小脑和小脑枕外隆凸)和四种线圈模型(平面线圈:MagStim D70;双锥线圈:MagStim DCC、MagVenture Cool-D-B80和Deymed 120BFV)进行了测试。对于解剖目标和线圈的任何组合,我们的流程都返回了多个可行解决方案,在几分钟内计算并筛选了2000多个候选方案,并得出了满足最小线圈与头皮距离要求的最佳位置,而直接方法仅针对目标和线圈的一种组合(即平面线圈和运动皮层上的凸目标)返回了可行候选方案。我们还发现,当目标是最大化E场强度时,与现有方法中常用的头皮表面法向量相比,目标到头皮的延长线是更好的线圈平移轴。我们将线圈放置的数值优化应用扩展到双锥线圈,双锥线圈正在研究和临床环境以及新的应用领域(如小脑TMS和共济失调治疗)中迅速普及。