van Ginkel Charlotte, Groenewoud J M M, Hoogeboom Thomas J, Heesakkers John, Martens Frank, Janssen Dick
Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e092757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092757.
The double blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled GAG-therapy Efficacy Trial Solution for Bladder pain syndrome/Interstitial cystitis (GETSBI) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravesical glycosaminoglycans therapy with hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate in symptomatic bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) patients with Hunner lesions. This trial encompasses multiple methodologies, including a standard randomised controlled trial (RCT), a cross-over trial and an N-of-1 trial. An N-of-1 trial is a multiple crossover trial, usually randomised and often blinded, conducted in a single patient (1). The N-of-1 methodology is, however, only valid under the condition that there is no carry-over effect, meaning a carry-over of effect from an a-priori intervention period into the placebo period. Therefore, it is important to examine any potential carry-over effects to determine the validity of the study protocol concerning the N-of-1 trial part and thereby justifying recruitment.
Interim analysis for potential carry-over effects.
Secondary care, 21 participants.
21 participants, participants concluded part one from the GETSBI study at time of this analysis (October 2023).
The primary outcome of the study is the change from baseline in pain intensity, measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain. To assess for carry-over effects, the placebo responses on VAS pain were compared between groups with (n=10) and without (n=11) potential carry-over effects. The threshold for a clinically relevant carry-over effect was set at a difference on VAS pain >0.50 points. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, T-tests, effect sizes and 95% CI. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05.
The mean baseline VAS pain did not differ (p=0.12) between group A (n=10, VAS 7.52, SD=0.52) and group B (n=11, VAS 6.02, SD=2.47). The mean placebo responses on VAS pain for groups A and B were 0.97 (SD=1.85) and 1.47 (SD=1.81), respectively. The mean carry-over effect was 0.50 (SD=1.83), which was not statistically significant with a 95% CI of -1.17 to 2.17 and p=0.5369.
This interim analysis shows that an N-of-1 trial probably will be feasible for evaluating non-curative treatment efficacy in chronic disease using only half the patients as are required for a classic RCT. Future analysis will provide a direct comparison of outcomes between the RCT, crossover and the N-of-1 part for a complete evaluation.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05518864 (GETSBI study).
双盲、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的膀胱疼痛综合征/间质性膀胱炎糖胺聚糖治疗疗效试验(GETSBI)旨在评估透明质酸和硫酸软骨素膀胱内注射糖胺聚糖疗法对有Hunner病变的有症状膀胱疼痛综合征/间质性膀胱炎(BPS/IC)患者的疗效。该试验涵盖多种方法,包括标准随机对照试验(RCT)、交叉试验和单病例试验。单病例试验是在单个患者中进行的多次交叉试验,通常是随机的且常常是盲法的(1)。然而,单病例方法仅在不存在残留效应的情况下才有效,即效应从先验干预期延续到安慰剂期。因此,检查任何潜在的残留效应对于确定关于单病例试验部分的研究方案的有效性并从而证明招募的合理性很重要。
对潜在残留效应进行中期分析。
二级医疗保健机构,21名参与者。
21名参与者,在本次分析(2023年10月)时完成了GETSBI研究第一部分的参与者。
该研究的主要结局是疼痛强度相对于基线的变化,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分来衡量。为了评估残留效应,比较了有潜在残留效应组(n = 10)和无潜在残留效应组(n = 11)在VAS疼痛评分上的安慰剂反应。临床相关残留效应的阈值设定为VAS疼痛评分差异>0.50分。使用描述性统计、t检验、效应量和95%置信区间对数据进行分析。设定统计学显著性水平为α = 0.05。
A组(n = 10,VAS 7.52,标准差 = 0.52)和B组(n = 11,VAS 6.02,标准差 = 2.47)之间的平均基线VAS疼痛评分无差异(p = 0.12)。A组和B组在VAS疼痛评分上的平均安慰剂反应分别为0.97(标准差 = 1.85)和1.47(标准差 = 1.81)。平均残留效应为0.50(标准差 = 1.83),95%置信区间为 -1.17至2.17,p = 0.5369,无统计学显著性。
这项中期分析表明,单病例试验可能仅使用经典RCT所需患者数量的一半,就可用于评估慢性病的非治愈性治疗疗效。未来的分析将对RCT、交叉试验和单病例试验部分的结局进行直接比较,以进行全面评估。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05518864(GETSBI研究)