• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索激光参数对铥光纤激光碎石术中反冲力和消融率的影响:一项体外研究。

Exploring the influence of laser parameters on retropulsion and ablation rate in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Liao Yunzhou, Zha Rongwei, Mei Xuehan, Wang Chenyang, Li Zhilong, Wang Huaixiong, Lei Cheng, Li Sheng, Wang Du, Wang Xinghuan

机构信息

The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04584-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04584-1
PMID:40473876
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to explore the influence of different laser parameters on stone retropulsion and ablation rate during thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy, and to evaluate its dusting effect.

METHODS

An experimental setup was designed to simultaneously measure the displacement and mass loss of stones. Ex vivo lithotripsy experiments were performed using a self-designed TFL system with average power ranging from 10 to 30 W, frequency from 10 to 1000 Hz and pulse energy from 25 to 3000 mJ. Stone retropulsion and ablation rates were systematically evaluated across various parameter configurations. Additionally, the size distribution of particles generated during lithotripsy was comprehensively assessed.

RESULTS

A higher average power resulted in a more intense stone retropulsion and a higher ablation rate. With a constant average power, both decreased as the frequency increased and the pulse energy decreased. The trend of mass loss was similar to that of the ablation rate. When the frequency was fixed, an increase in pulse energy significantly enhanced the retropulsion, whereas an increase in frequency at fixed pulse energy had a smaller impact on retropulsion. When the frequency reached 250 Hz and the pulse energy was reduced to 120 mJ, the stone retropulsion essentially disappeared. The maximum ablation rate (112.247 mg/min) was achieved at 10 Hz × 3000 mJ. For average powers fixed at 20 W and 10 W, the optimal parameters for the highest ablation rates were identified as 20 Hz × 1000 mJ and 20 Hz × 500 mJ, resulting in ablation rates of 65.451 mg/min and 40.742 mg/min, respectively. Under several representative configurations, all generated particles had diameters less than 600 μm.

CONCLUSION

Compared with frequency, pulse energy has a greater impact on both retropulsion and ablation rate. For non-fixed stones, increasing the pulse energy enhances the ablation rate but also intensifies the retropulsion effect, which can partially offset the increase in ablation rate. The TFL exhibits an excellent dusting effect. A conservative setting of 10 W, frequency below 50 Hz and pulse energy above 200 mJ can be referenced for clinical application.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨不同激光参数对铥光纤激光(TFL)碎石术中结石回退和消融率的影响,并评估其粉末化效果。

方法

设计了一个实验装置来同时测量结石的位移和质量损失。使用自行设计的TFL系统进行体外碎石实验,平均功率范围为10至30 W,频率为10至1000 Hz,脉冲能量为25至3000 mJ。系统评估了各种参数配置下的结石回退和消融率。此外,还全面评估了碎石过程中产生的颗粒的尺寸分布。

结果

较高的平均功率导致更强的结石回退和更高的消融率。在平均功率恒定的情况下,随着频率增加和脉冲能量降低,两者均下降。质量损失趋势与消融率相似。当频率固定时,脉冲能量增加会显著增强回退,而在固定脉冲能量下频率增加对回退的影响较小。当频率达到250 Hz且脉冲能量降至120 mJ时,结石回退基本消失。在10 Hz×3000 mJ时达到最大消融率(112.247 mg/min)。对于固定在20 W和10 W的平均功率,最高消融率的最佳参数分别确定为20 Hz×1000 mJ和20 Hz×500 mJ,消融率分别为65.451 mg/min和40.742 mg/min。在几种代表性配置下,所有产生的颗粒直径均小于600μm。

结论

与频率相比,脉冲能量对回退和消融率的影响更大。对于非固定结石,增加脉冲能量可提高消融率,但也会增强回退效应,这可能会部分抵消消融率的增加。TFL表现出出色的粉末化效果。临床应用可参考保守设置10 W、频率低于50 Hz和脉冲能量高于200 mJ。

相似文献

1
Exploring the influence of laser parameters on retropulsion and ablation rate in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro study.探索激光参数对铥光纤激光碎石术中反冲力和消融率的影响:一项体外研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04584-1.
2
Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.钬:YAG 和铥光纤激光碎石术的比较:消融阈值、消融速率和后向推力效应。
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):071403. doi: 10.1117/1.3564884.
3
Optimal parameter settings of thulium fiber laser for ureteral stone lithotripsy: a comparative study in two different testing environments.钬光纤激光治疗输尿管结石的最佳参数设置:两种不同测试环境的对比研究。
Urolithiasis. 2024 May 27;52(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01585-0.
4
High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.高功率钬激光与铥光纤激光在粉末化模式下治疗肾结石的对比:消融率及碎片大小研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2019 Aug;51(6):522-530. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23057. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.超脉冲铥光纤激光与钬:YAG 激光碎石术的临床前比较。
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
6
Enhanced thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using micro-pulse train modulation.采用微脉冲串调制增强铥光纤激光碎石术。
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Feb;17(2):028002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.2.028002.
7
Comparative Analyses and Ablation Efficiency of Thulium Fiber Laser by Stone Composition.基于结石成分的比较分析和铥光纤激光的消融效率。
J Urol. 2024 Mar;211(3):445-454. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003833. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
8
A historical comparison of thulium fiber laser systems for stone lithotripsy: navigating toward safe and effective parameters.钬光纤激光系统在结石碎石术中的历史比较:探索安全有效的参数。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04789-6.
9
Superpulse thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro comparison of 200 μm and 150 μm laser fibers.超脉冲铥光纤激光碎石术:200μm 和 150μm 激光光纤的体外比较。
World J Urol. 2021 Dec;39(12):4459-4464. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03800-8. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
10
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An Assessment.追求铥光纤激光的最佳粉尘设置:评估。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):914-920. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel preoperative evaluation technique for partial nephrectomy: three-dimensional extended renal tumor plane.一种用于部分肾切除术的新型术前评估技术:三维扩展肾肿瘤平面
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 23;43(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05395-2.
2
Does coiling of the proximal end of the ureteral stent affect stent-related symptoms?输尿管支架近端卷曲是否会影响与支架相关的症状?
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 6;43(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05345-y.
3
Comparison of Pulsed-Thulium:YAG, Holmium:YAG, and Thulium Fiber Laser.脉冲铥激光、钬激光和铥光纤激光的比较
J Endourol. 2024 Dec;38(12):1427-1435. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0424. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
In vitro investigation of stone ablation efficiency, char formation, spark generation, and damage mechanism produced by thulium fiber laser.体外研究钬光纤激光碎石效率、炭化形成、火花产生和损伤机制。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 2;51(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01501-y.
5
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An Assessment.追求铥光纤激光的最佳粉尘设置:评估。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):914-920. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.了解钬:YAG 和掺铥光纤激光器的消融率。一项体外研究的观点。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jan 17;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6.
7
Stone ablation efficacy: a comparison of a thulium fibre laser and two pulse-modulated holmium:YAG lasers.结石消融效果:铥光纤激光与两种脉冲调制钬:YAG 激光的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jan 12;51(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01393-4.
8
Comparison of stone retropulsion between Moses mode and virtual basket mode: an in vitro study using artificial stones.Moses 模式与虚拟篮筐模式下结石后向运动的比较:应用人工结石的体外研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01335-0. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
9
Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter's experts' recommendations.输尿管镜检查时钬光纤激光的预设:推特专家的建议。
World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1529-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03966-9. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
10
Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.铥光纤激光和钬激光碎石术中激光光纤的位移速度:引入最佳位移速度的概念
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 29;11(1):181. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010181.