Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jan 17;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6.
This study sought to analyze the ablation rates of Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) under different settings combinations. Lasering was carried out by a computed spiral pattern through a stepper motor bearing a laser fiber. BegoStones were placed inside a water container and lasered therein and the ablation rate was calculated. Different combinations were tested for ~12 Watts (W) for Ho:YAG and TFL lasers. Further 25 W combination for TFL were conducted testing higher frequencies. One-hundred-one experiments were conducted. Under ~12 W, the highest ablation rate for Ho:YAG was obtained with 40 Hz/0.3 J, and Virtual Basket™ (VB) emission mode [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40) mg/min] whereas for TFL, using 40 Hz/0.3 J, and long pulse [143.40 (137.40 - 146) mg/min]. A matched-comparison for 12 Hz/1 J settings showed that TFL outperformed Ho:YAG using medium pulse [63.30 (55.30 - 81.30) vs 132.00 (115.70 - 228.60) mg/min, p=0.016] and long pulse [62.90 (51.60 - 78.90) vs 134.70 (110.60 - 149.30) mg/min, p=0.016]. In the 40 Hz/0.3 J settings, TFL outperformed Ho:YAG (p=0.034). Nonetheless, Ho:YAG with VB's ablation rate increased [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40)], being comparable to that of TFL with medium pulse [127.5 (88.90 - 141.70)] (p=0.400). In TFL 25 W experiments, the ablation rate of 500 Hz / 0.05 J, was higher than those of 1000 Hz / 0.025 J (p=0.049). TFL ablation rate is higher than that of Ho:YAG. Moreover, the Virtual Basket™ emission mode, increased Ho:YAG ablation rates, resulting reaching similar to that of TFL in certain modalities.
钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)和掺铥光纤激光(TFL)在不同设定组合下的消融率。激光通过带有激光光纤的步进电机以计算出的螺旋图案进行照射。BegoStones 被放置在一个盛水的容器中进行激光照射,并计算消融率。对 Ho:YAG 和 TFL 激光器进行了12 瓦(W)的不同组合测试。对 TFL 进行了进一步的 25 W 组合测试,以测试更高的频率。共进行了 101 次实验。在12 W 下,Ho:YAG 的最高消融率是在 40 Hz/0.3 J 和 Virtual Basket™(VB)发射模式下获得的[114.35(88.30-126.40)mg/min],而对于 TFL,使用 40 Hz/0.3 J 和长脉冲[143.40(137.40-146)mg/min]。在 12 Hz/1 J 设置下进行的匹配比较表明,TFL 在使用中脉冲时优于 Ho:YAG[63.30(55.30-81.30)vs 132.00(115.70-228.60)mg/min,p=0.016]和长脉冲[62.90(51.60-78.90)vs 134.70(110.60-149.30)mg/min,p=0.016]。在 40 Hz/0.3 J 设置下,TFL 优于 Ho:YAG(p=0.034)。尽管如此,Ho:YAG 与 VB 的消融率增加[114.35(88.30-126.40)],与 TFL 中脉冲的消融率相当[127.5(88.90-141.70)](p=0.400)。在 TFL 25 W 实验中,500 Hz/0.05 J 的消融率高于 1000 Hz/0.025 J(p=0.049)。TFL 的消融率高于 Ho:YAG。此外,Virtual Basket™ 发射模式增加了 Ho:YAG 的消融率,导致在某些模式下达到与 TFL 相似的水平。