Suppr超能文献

钬:YAG 和铥光纤激光碎石术的比较:消融阈值、消融速率和后向推力效应。

Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Physics and Optical Science, 9201 University City Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223-0001, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):071403. doi: 10.1117/1.3564884.

Abstract

The holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but efficient operation is limited to low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the thulium fiber laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate efficiently at high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion for the two different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ = 1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5 to 35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10 to 400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ = 2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30 to 550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and a pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through 200- and 270-μm-core optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 and 20.8 J∕cm(2), respectively. Stone retropulsion with the Ho:YAG laser linearly increased with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates less than 150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies less than 175 mJ at 10 Hz and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies of 100 to 200 mJ and high pulse rates of 100 to 150 Hz may also provide an alternative to the Ho:YAG laser for higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not a primary concern.

摘要

钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光碎石仪能够以高脉冲能量运行,但在碎石过程中,有效运行仅限于低脉冲率(约 10 Hz)。相反,掺铥光纤激光(TFL)的脉冲能量有限,但在高脉冲率(高达 1000 Hz)下可以高效运行。本研究比较了两种不同的 Ho:YAG 和 TFL 操作模式的结石消融阈值、消融率和后向力。TFL(λ = 1908nm)的操作脉冲能量为 5 至 35mJ,脉冲持续时间为 500-μs,脉冲率为 10 至 400Hz。Ho:YAG 激光(λ = 2120nm)的操作脉冲能量为 30 至 550mJ,脉冲持续时间为 350-μs,脉冲率为 10Hz。激光能量通过接触模式输送到 200-μm 和 270-μm 芯光纤,用于消融研究的人草酸钙一水合物(COM)结石和用于后向力研究的石膏模型结石。Ho:YAG 和 TFL 测量的 COM 结石消融阈值分别为 82.6 和 20.8J/cm2。Ho:YAG 激光的结石后向力随脉冲能量呈线性增加。TFL 的后向力在脉冲率小于 150Hz 时最小,然后在更高的脉冲率时迅速增加。为了最小化结石后向力,建议在 10Hz 时将 Ho:YAG 激光的脉冲能量降低至小于 175mJ,在 100Hz 时将 TFL 激光的脉冲能量降低至 35mJ,这两种激光的消融率相当。进一步开发一种 TFL,使其能够在 100 至 200mJ 的高脉冲能量和 100 至 150Hz 的高脉冲率下运行,当后向力不是主要关注点时,也可为更高的消融率提供一种替代 Ho:YAG 激光的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验