Suppr超能文献

共同决策与透析选择:一项观察性纵向队列研究。

Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study.

作者信息

de-la-Motte Pernille, Jensen Victoria Baekager Just, Bergum Maria Højer, Mose Frank Holden, Khatir Dinah Sherzad, Finderup Jeanette

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jun 5;26(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04220-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'Shared decision making and dialysis choice' intervention has been part of usual care at two hospitals in Denmark since 2018. The objective was to describe dialysis modality choice and outcomes for patients with kidney failure who received a shared decision making intervention.

METHODS

Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study design was used. Data were collected from 2018 to 2023 on 484 patients with kidney failure from one regional and one university hospital. The exposure was a shared decision making intervention for dialysis choice. The predictors were frailty, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), comorbidity, Body Mass Index (BMI), ethnicity, marital status and smoking. The outcomes were home-based dialysis, time, concordance, and death. Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed whether choice of dialysis modality differed significantly. Aalen-Johansen estimation assessed time from the shared decision making intervention to treatment initiation, concordance between chosen and initiated treatment, and mortality before treatment initiation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards evaluated the patient characteristics predicting these three outcomes.

RESULTS

After the intervention, 68% chose home-based dialysis, while 32% chose center-based dialysis. With significant differences, more patients aged ≤ 70 years, at the university hospital, and living with a partner chose home-based dialysis. Half of the patients initiated treatment within 11 months, and predictors for initiating dialysis later than 11 months were age ≥ 70 years and eGFR > 15 ml/min/1.73 m². 83% of the patients received the treatment chosen, and predictors for concordance were center-based dialysis, regional hospital, and very mild to mild frailty. 12% of the patients died before treatment initiation, predicted by very mild to severe frailty and BMI < 25 kg/m².

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients chose a home-based treatment after receiving the intervention and initiated their preferred dialysis choice. 50% of patients received the intervention 11 months before initiating dialysis, and few patients died before initiating dialysis. Routinely assessing frailty and BMI prior to intervention could possibly improve patient pathways. Complete follow-up for all patients was not ensured.

摘要

背景

自2018年以来,“共同决策与透析选择”干预措施一直是丹麦两家医院常规护理的一部分。目的是描述接受共同决策干预的肾衰竭患者的透析方式选择及结果。

方法

采用回顾性观察性纵向队列研究设计。收集了2018年至2023年来自一家地区医院和一家大学医院的484例肾衰竭患者的数据。暴露因素为透析选择的共同决策干预。预测因素为虚弱、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、合并症、体重指数(BMI)、种族、婚姻状况和吸烟情况。结果指标为居家透析、时间、一致性和死亡情况。Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验评估透析方式的选择是否存在显著差异。Aalen-Johansen估计法评估从共同决策干预到开始治疗的时间、所选治疗与开始治疗之间的一致性以及开始治疗前的死亡率。逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型评估预测这三个结果的患者特征。

结果

干预后,68%的患者选择居家透析,而32%的患者选择中心透析。存在显著差异的是,更多年龄≤70岁、在大学医院且有伴侣陪伴的患者选择居家透析。一半的患者在11个月内开始治疗,而开始透析时间晚于11个月的预测因素为年龄≥70岁和eGFR>15 ml/min/1.73 m²。83%的患者接受了所选治疗,一致性的预测因素为中心透析、地区医院以及非常轻度至轻度虚弱。12%的患者在开始治疗前死亡,预测因素为非常轻度至重度虚弱和BMI<25 kg/m²。

结论

接受干预后,很大比例的患者选择了居家治疗并开始了他们首选的透析方式。50%的患者在开始透析前11个月接受了干预,很少有患者在开始透析前死亡。在干预前常规评估虚弱和BMI可能会改善患者就医流程。未确保对所有患者进行完整随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecb/12142963/264e1aab135a/12882_2025_4220_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared decision making and dialysis choice: an observational longitudinal cohort study.
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jun 5;26(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04220-1.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD007693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007693.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Kidney disease pathways, options and decisions: an environmental scan of international patient decision aids.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Dec 4;35(12):2072-2082. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa102.
3
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in CKD: 2020 Update.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Sep;76(3 Suppl 1):S1-S107. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.006.
5
Exploring the choices and outcomes of older patients with advanced kidney disease.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 10;15(6):e0234309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234309. eCollection 2020.
7
Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 27;10(2):e034142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034142.
9
Frailty and chronic kidney disease: current evidence and continuing uncertainties.
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Apr;11(2):236-245. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx134. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
10
The impact of frailty on outcomes in dialysis.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2017 Nov;26(6):537-542. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000364.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验