• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统谷物饲养和草饲喂养系统对肉牛粪便微生物群和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的影响。

Effect of conventional grain-fed and grass-fed feeding systems on fecal microbiota and shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle.

作者信息

Talukder Sudipta, Yang Frederick, Klopatek Sarah, Oltjen James, Yang Xiang

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, 2237 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04073-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12866-025-04073-6
PMID:40474080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12142967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) remains a significant public health concern in beef production, regardless of feeding systems. While consumer interest in grass-fed beef has increased due to climate change concerns and social media trends, the safety implications of different feeding practices on STEC prevalence and populations are not fully understood. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of grain-fed and grass-fed feeding systems on STEC prevalence, population, and its interaction with the fecal microbiota in beef cattle. Post-weaning steers were assigned to four feeding systems: Conventional grain-fed (CON,  = 21), 20-month grass-fed (20GF,  = 18), 25-month grass-fed (25GF,  = 16), and 45-day grain-fed after 20-month grass-fed (GR45,  = 13). Rectal fecal samples were collected at 14 months of age as baseline and pre-harvest for STEC enumeration, prevalence, and microbial analysis. The microbial DNA was extracted and sequenced for 16 S rRNA gene for microbiota analysis.

RESULTS

Data demonstrated that cattle in grain-fed feeding system had a higher ( < 0.05) fecal STEC population than the grass-fed feeding system. However, the fecal prevalence of STEC was lower ( < 0.05) only in the GR45 compared to the grass-fed groups, while the CON group did not differ ( > 0.05) in STEC prevalence. In terms of STEC population, GR45 was more similar to the grain-fed group. Alpha diversity was greater ( < 0.05) in CON, followed by 25GF, with GR45 being the only system where alpha diversity decreased ( < 0.05) from baseline to harvest. Beta diversity showed a notable difference ( = 0.913,  = 0.001) in fecal microbial composition between CON and GR45. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla across all feeding systems. At harvest, GR45 had the highest ( < 0.0001) Firmicutes abundance, followed by 20GF, while the lowest levels were observed in 25GF and CON. Among bacterial families, was more abundant in grass-fed groups, whereas was more prevalent in the grain-fed CON group. Microbiota associated with lower STEC prevalence, such as Bacteroidetes, were more abundant in STEC-negative samples.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that feeding systems influence both STEC levels and gut microbial diversity, offering insights into managing microbiota to enhance food safety in beef production. Nonetheless, the results should be interpreted in the context of the study’s limited sample size and the inherent variability associated with intermittent STEC shedding and microbiota composition.

摘要

背景

无论饲养系统如何,产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)仍然是牛肉生产中一个重大的公共卫生问题。尽管由于气候变化担忧和社交媒体趋势,消费者对草饲牛肉的兴趣有所增加,但不同饲养方式对STEC流行率和数量的安全影响尚未完全了解。因此,本研究的目的是评估谷物饲养和草饲系统对肉牛STEC流行率、数量及其与粪便微生物群相互作用的影响。断奶后的阉牛被分配到四种饲养系统:传统谷物饲养(CON,n = 21)、20个月草饲(20GF,n = 18)、25个月草饲(25GF,n = 16)以及20个月草饲后45天谷物饲养(GR45,n = 13)。在14月龄时采集直肠粪便样本作为基线样本,并在收获前采集样本用于STEC计数、流行率和微生物分析。提取微生物DNA并对16S rRNA基因进行测序以进行微生物群分析。

结果

数据表明,谷物饲养系统中的牛粪便STEC数量高于草饲系统(P < 0.05)。然而,与草饲组相比,仅GR45组的STEC粪便流行率较低(P < 0.05),而CON组的STEC流行率无差异(P > 0.05)。在STEC数量方面,GR45与谷物饲养组更为相似。CON组的α多样性更大(P < 0.05),其次是25GF组,GR45是唯一从基线到收获α多样性降低(P < )的系统。β多样性显示CON组和GR45组之间粪便微生物组成存在显著差异(P = 0.913,P = 0.001)。厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门是所有饲养系统中的优势菌门。在收获时,GR45组的厚壁菌门丰度最高(P < 0.0001),其次是20GF组,而25GF组和CON组的水平最低。在细菌科中,草饲组中 更为丰富,而谷物饲养的CON组中 更为普遍。与较低STEC流行率相关的微生物群,如拟杆菌门,在STEC阴性样本中更为丰富。

结论

这些发现表明饲养系统会影响STEC水平和肠道微生物多样性,为通过管理微生物群来提高牛肉生产中的食品安全提供了见解。尽管如此,应结合本研究有限的样本量以及与STEC间歇性排出和微生物群组成相关的固有变异性来解释这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/ff94c796d1a0/12866_2025_4073_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/bf936f1df357/12866_2025_4073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/aafdcd5a9386/12866_2025_4073_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/b38044e56174/12866_2025_4073_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/760db298ed9b/12866_2025_4073_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/09f84e035f31/12866_2025_4073_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/62f3cd9d9099/12866_2025_4073_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/ff94c796d1a0/12866_2025_4073_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/bf936f1df357/12866_2025_4073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/aafdcd5a9386/12866_2025_4073_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/b38044e56174/12866_2025_4073_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/760db298ed9b/12866_2025_4073_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/09f84e035f31/12866_2025_4073_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/62f3cd9d9099/12866_2025_4073_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/12142967/ff94c796d1a0/12866_2025_4073_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of conventional grain-fed and grass-fed feeding systems on fecal microbiota and shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle.传统谷物饲养和草饲喂养系统对肉牛粪便微生物群和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的影响。
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04073-6.
2
Detection and Quantification of Seven Major Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli on Hides of Cull Dairy, Cull Beef, and Fed Beef Cattle at Slaughter.宰前淘汰奶牛、淘汰肉牛和育肥牛胴体牛皮中 7 种志贺毒素产生大肠埃希氏菌的检测与定量。
J Food Prot. 2018 Aug;81(8):1236-1244. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-497.
3
Fecal shedding of non-O157 serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feedlot cattle vaccinated with an Escherichia coli O157:H7 SRP vaccine or fed a Lactobacillus-based direct-fed microbial.肥育牛接种大肠杆菌 O157:H7 SRP 疫苗或饲喂基于乳酸菌的直接添加微生物后,非 O157 血清群的产志贺毒素大肠杆菌在粪便中的排泄。
J Food Prot. 2014 May;77(5):732-7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-358.
4
Genetic and Phenotypic Factors Associated with Persistent Shedding of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli by Beef Cattle.与肉牛持续排出产志贺毒素大肠杆菌相关的遗传和表型因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Oct 1;86(20). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01292-20.
5
High prevalence of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle detected by combining four selective agars.四种选择性琼脂联合检测牛肉中高流行率的非 O157 型产志贺毒素大肠杆菌。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1582-8.
6
Low Prevalence of Salmonella and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Lymph Nodes of Australian Beef Cattle.澳大利亚肉牛淋巴结中沙门氏菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的低流行率
J Food Prot. 2017 Dec;80(12):2105-2111. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-180.
7
Associations Between Season, Processing Plant, and Hide Cleanliness Scores with Prevalence and Concentration of Major Shiga Toxin-Producing on Beef Cattle Hides.季节、加工厂与牛皮清洁度评分与牛只带皮部位大肠埃希氏菌 O157:H7 带菌率和带菌量的关系。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2020 Oct;17(10):611-619. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2778. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
National Survey of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Serotypes O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157 in Australian Beef Cattle Feces.澳大利亚肉牛粪便中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌血清型O26、O45、O103、O111、O121、O145和O157的全国性调查。
J Food Prot. 2016 Nov;79(11):1868-1874. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-507.
9
Detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7, O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145, and Salmonella in retail raw ground beef using the DuPont™ BAX® system.使用杜邦™ BAX® 系统检测零售生绞碎牛肉中的产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)O157:H7、O26、O45、O103、O111、O121和O145以及沙门氏菌。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Jun 18;4:81. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00081. eCollection 2014.
10
Proportions and Serogroups of Enterohemorrhagic Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Feces of Fed and Cull Beef and Cull Dairy Cattle at Harvest.宰前肥育牛和淘汰奶牛粪便中肠出血性志贺样毒素产生大肠杆菌的比例和血清群。
J Food Prot. 2024 Jun;87(6):100273. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100273. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Rumen Microbial Predictors for Short-Chain Fatty Acid Levels and the Grass-Fed Regimen in Angus Cattle.安格斯牛瘤胃微生物对短链脂肪酸水平及草饲模式的预测指标
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;12(21):2995. doi: 10.3390/ani12212995.
2
Study of cattle microbiota in different regions of Kazakhstan using 16S metabarcoding analysis.利用16S宏条形码分析对哈萨克斯坦不同地区牛微生物群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 30;12(1):16410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20732-4.
3
Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.
草饲与谷饲牛肉生产系统:性能、经济和环境权衡。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Feb 1;100(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab374.
4
Composition of Fecal Microbiota in Grazing and Feedlot Angus Beef Cattle.放牧和饲养场安格斯肉牛粪便微生物群的组成
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 5;11(11):3167. doi: 10.3390/ani11113167.
5
Characterizing the Cattle Gut Microbiome in Farms with a High and Low Prevalence of Shiga Toxin Producing .对产志贺毒素患病率高和低的农场中的牛肠道微生物群进行特征分析
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 14;9(8):1737. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081737.
6
Diet-induced changes in bacterial communities in the jejunum and their associations with bile acids in Angus beef cattle.日粮诱导的安格斯肉牛空肠细菌群落变化及其与胆汁酸的关联
Anim Microbiome. 2020 Sep 16;2(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00051-7.
7
An Overview of the Elusive Passenger in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Cattle: The Shiga Toxin Producing .牛胃肠道中难以捉摸的过客概述:产志贺毒素的……
Microorganisms. 2020 Jun 10;8(6):877. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060877.
8
Enzymatically Digested Food Waste Altered Fecal Microbiota But Not Meat Quality and Carcass Characteristics of Growing-Finishing Pigs.酶解食物残渣改变了生长育肥猪的粪便微生物群,但未影响其肉质和胴体特性。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 14;9(11):970. doi: 10.3390/ani9110970.
9
Effect of different seasons (spring vs summer) on the microbiota diversity in the feces of dairy cows.不同季节(春季与夏季)对奶牛粪便中微生物多样性的影响。
Int J Biometeorol. 2020 Mar;64(3):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s00484-019-01812-z. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Microbiota of newborn calves and their mothers reveals possible transfer routes for newborn calves' gastrointestinal microbiota.新生犊牛及其母畜的微生物群系揭示了新生犊牛胃肠道微生物群系可能的转移途径。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220554. eCollection 2019.